Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Karnes”
United States v. Karnespublic domain
559 F.2d 1222 U. S.v.Karnes No. 77-5022 United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit 6/27/77 1 W.D.Ky. AFFIRMED
United States v. Karnespublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Pee Curiam: Contrary to his pleas the appellant was convicted by general court-martial of two specifications of violating a general order by possessing and selling marihuana in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §892. We granted review to determine whether the military judge erroneously denied a defense challenge for cause against a court member.
Kafele v. Karnespublic domain
Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.
Karnes v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Kafele v. Karnespublic domain
Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.
Kafele v. Karnespublic domain
Sup. Ct. Ohio. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until May 12, 2008, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 88(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Kafele v. Karnespublic domain
539 U.S. 904 Kafelev.Karnes et al. No. 02-9054. Supreme Court of United States. June 2, 2003. 1 Appeal from the Sup. Ct. Ohio. 2 Certiorari denied. Reported below: 97 Ohio St. 3d 1
Karnes v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Guess v. Karnespublic domain
C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. Petitioner is allowed until March 25, 1996, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
McLenagan v. Karnespublic domain
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United Technologies Corporation v. Janet Karnespublic domain
FILED STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA June 23, 2021 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
McLenagan v. Karnespublic domain
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Karnes v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Karnes v. Runyonpublic domain
912 F.Supp. 280 (1995) Patricia A. KARNES, Plaintiff, v. Marvin RUNYON, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant. No. C-1-94-426. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. December 27, 1995. *281 *282 Susan Sauter, Cincinnati, OH, for plaintiff. Jan M
Karnes v. Marrowpublic domain
Newbern, J., not participating. Brown, J., concurring in part; dissenting in part. Robert L. Brown, Justice. I would affirm the chancellor’s decision across the board. The majority second guesses the chancellor’s finding óf fact that a separate agreement to apply farm income to not
Boersma v. Karnespublic domain
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Neb. dismissed for want of substantial federal question. Justice White and Justice Blackmun would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.
Karnes v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Aimee Karnes v. Department of Justicepublic domain
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD 2023 MSPB 12 Docket No. DA-1221-21-0009-W-1 Aimee Karnes, Appellant, v. Department of Justice, Agency.
Boersma v. Karnespublic domain
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Neb.; and C. A. 2d Cir. The Solicitor General is invited to file briefs in these cases expressing the views of the United States.
Boersma v. Karnespublic domain
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Neb. dismissed for want of substantial federal question. Justice White and Justice Blackmun would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.