Cases

PER CURIAM: Rohan St. Joseph Keating appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Keating, No. 2:93-cr-00066-HCM-2 (E.D. Va. filed May 5, 2008; entered May 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

579 F.3d 891 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Paul KEATING, Appellant. No. 09-1126. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: June 8, 2009. Filed: September 1, 2009. *892 John C. Vanderslice, AFPC, Lincoln, NE, for appellant. Steven A. Russell, AUSA, Lincoln, NE, for appellee.

740 F.2d 964 U.S.v.Keating 84-6183 United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. 7/18/84 1 E.D.Va. AFFIRMED

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 09-1126 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.1.

The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in the above-entitled case was dismissed today pursuant to Rule 46.1 of the Rules of this Court. Same case below, 598 F.3d 753.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied. Same case below, 389 U.S. App. D.C. 424, 599 F.3d 686.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

45 F.3d 443NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. James L. KEATING, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.The

C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ante, p. 969] denied.

C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ante, p. 969] denied.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 10th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Breyer, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. "See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any farther petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Col

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. "See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any farther petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Col

C. A. 10th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Breyer, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.