Cases

Honorable Susan M. Brnovich, United States District Judge There are seven defendants in this matter. Of which, six have joined the motion before the Court. Defendants Joye Vaught and Andrew Padilla filed a motion to dismiss the indictment against them or, in the alternative, a motion to allow their counsel to withdraw. (Doc. 456). Defendants James Larkin (Doc. 463), Scott Spear (Doc. 464), Michael Lacey (Doc. 465), and John Brunst (

EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, with whom BAUER, Circuit Judge, joins, dissenting. Lacey Phillips and Erin Hall decided to buy a house together. After one bank *657turned them down because their income was inadequate, Brian Bowling, a loan broker, told them that they could get a loan by changing what they told the potential lender. B

ORDER Enoch Lacey pleaded guilty to possession with intent to deliver heroin, 18 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court sentenced Lacey to 166 months’ imprisonment. He appeals only his sentence, claiming that the district court failed to adequately weigh an argument that he raised in mitigation of the sentence. Because the court did consider the argument, we affirm.

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 December 7, 2012 By the Court: Nos. 11-3822 & 11-3824 Appeals from the United States District Court for UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, the Western District of Plaintiff-Appellee,

EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge. Lacey Phillips and Erin Hall decided to buy a house together. They asked Associated Bank for a mortgage loan. It said no, because Hall had a recent bankruptcy and the couple’s joint income (approximately $3,800 a month) was too low for the loan they needed (more than $200,000). Phillips and Hall next turned to Brian Bowling, a mortgage broker. Bowling told them that they could qualify under what he

GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge: Defendants-appellants Kirk Lacey and Omar Henry were convicted by jury in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Kimba M. Wood, J.) on charges stemming from their involvement in a fraudulent mortgage scheme. They appeal their sentences and restitution orders but not their convictions. We hold that U.S. Sentencing Guidelines § 2B 1.1(b)(2)(A)(ii), which

569 F.3d 319 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven LACEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-2515. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued February 20, 2009. Decided June 12, 2009. *321 Thomas Edward Leggans, Attorney (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Benton, IL, fo

ORDER Enoch Lacey pleaded guilty to possession with intent to deliver heroin, 18 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court sentenced Lacey to 166 months’ imprisonment. He appeals only his sentence, claiming that the district court failed to adequately weigh an argument that he raised in mitigation of the sentence. Because the court did consider the argument, we affirm.

MEMORANDUM * Daniel Lacey appeals the district court’s denial of his suppression motion. He claims that the court erred in admitting evidence seized pursuant to the consent of Carla Dozier, the girlfriend with whom he lived. Lacey claims that Dozier lacked either actual or apparent authority to consent to the seizure of his home computer and to the search and seizure of media files located in the garage of

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE. SENTELLE, Circuit Judge: Appellant Ricardo Lacey was indicted for several offenses including distribution of cocaine base and theft. During the trial proceedings he moved the court for judgment of acquittal on the theft charge. The court denied the motion. He was subsequently convicted of,

993 F.Supp. 831 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Richard R. LACEY Defendant/Movant. Nos. 89-10054-01-SAC, 97-3452-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. January 13, 1998. Richard Ray Lacey, El Reno, OK, pro se. James E. Flory, Office of U.S. Attorney, Topeka, KS, for U.S. *832

137 F.3d 1354 U.S.v.Lacey* NO. 96-3526 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. February 27, 1998 Appeal From: N.D.Fla. ,No.8801026crmmp 1 Affirmed.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CROW, District Judge. On July 27, 1989, Richard Lacey was indicted by a federal grand jury for conspiracy *600to distribute cocaine and distribution of cocaine. On February 6, 1990, Lacey failed to appear at trial as ordered; Lacey was tried in absentia. The jury returned a guilty verdict on March 26, 1990. Lacey remained a fugitiv

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CROW, District Judge. On July 27, 1989, Richard Lacey was indicted by a federal grand jury for conspiracy to distribute cocaine and distribution of cocaine. On February 6, 1990, Lacey failed to appear at trial as ordered; Lacey was tried in absentia. The jury returned a guilty verdict on March 26, 1990. Lacey remained a fugitive until February 1991, when he was apprehended by Federal

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CROW, District Judge. On July 27, 1989, Richard Lacey was indicted by a federal grand jury for conspiracy to distribute cocaine, distribution of cocaine and possession with intent to distribute cocaine and marijuana.1 Trial in this case commenced on the morning of May 16,1994. On May 26,1994, the parties rested. The defendant did not testify in his own

778 F.Supp. 1137 (1991) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Richard Ray LACEY, a/k/a Rick Ray Lacey, Defendant. No. 89-10054-01. United States District Court, D. Kansas. October 2, 1991. *1138 Emily Metzger, Asst. U.S. Atty., Wichita, Kan., for U.S. Stephen E. Robison, Wichita, Kan., for defendant. James L. Pink

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ZATKOFF, District Judge. I. This matter is before the Court on defendant Marcus Lacey’s motion to dismiss the charges against him on double jeopardy grounds. On December 10,1991, this Court held an evidentiary hearing to resolve the issues raised in defendant’s motion. Therein, two witnesses testified: DEA Agent Brian Hal-tom and FBI Age

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CROW, District Judge. This case comes before the court upon the motion of American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida (American Bankers) to set aside the judgment for bond forfeiture. The Government opposes American Bankers’ motion. FACTS On July 6, 1989, Richard Ray Lacey was charged by information with violations of federal drug laws. On July 12,

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CROW, District Judge. The defendant was indicted by the grand jury of one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine, a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, three counts of distribution of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2, one count of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) a