Cases

715 F.Supp.2d 1165 (2010) Secundino BAEZ, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America; Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security of the United States; Alejandro Mayorkas, USCIS Director; Christina Poulos, Director, USCIS California Service Center; Eric Holder, United States Attorney General, Defendants. No. CV-09-662-HU. United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division.

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 United States v. Rodriguez-Suazo No. 01-2590 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2003 FED App. 0354P (6th Cir.) File Name: 03a0354p.06 _________________ OPINION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ___________

OPINION MOORE, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Alfredo Rodriguez-Suazo (“Rodriguez-Suazo”) appeals from the judgment entered against him after he entered a conditional guilty plea to the following offenses: reentry of deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents and information

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: Mario Prieto-Tejas appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. *1100 § 841(a)(1); conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846; and carrying a firearm unlawfully

BACHARACH, Circuit-Judge. This case involves the authority of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to issue nationwide permits under § 404(e) of the Clean Water Act. These permits authorize activities involving discharge of dredged or fill material in U.S. waters and wetlands. See 33 U.S.C. § 1344(e) (2012). Exercising this permitting authority, the Corps issued Nationwide Permit 12, which allows anyone to construct uti

BACHARACH, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I join virtually all of Chief Judge Bris-coe’s thorough, persuasive opinion. But, I respectfully dissent on Part IV(A)(2). There, the majority rejects the Petitioners’ challenge to the sufficiency of the budget for the Universal Service Fund. On this limited issue, I respectfully dissent. In my view, the FC

756 F.Supp. 1298 (1990) Yolanda GARZA, et al., Plaintiffs, United States of America, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, Los Angeles Board of Supervisors, et al., Defendants, Lawrence K. Irvin, et al., Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Nos. CV 88-5143 KN(Ex), CV 88-5435 KN(Ex). United States District Court, C.D. California. June 4, 1990. As Corrected

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit May 23, 2014 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court