⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Leventhal”

District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012-10-09 · Published · cited 0× · 481 B.R. 409
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUZANNE B. CONLON, District Judge. On April 13, 2012, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois entered a judgment order declaring Howard Leventhal’s debt to Gene Schenberg non-dischargeable pursuant to § 523(a)(3)(B) of title 11 of the United States Code. Schenberg v. Leventhal et al., 11-ap-1467, 2012 WL 1067568
Supreme Court of the United States · 2012-01-17 · Published · cited 0× · 565 U.S. 1160
Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2012-01-17 · Published · cited 0× · 181 L. Ed. 2d 984; 2012 U.S. LEXIS 747; 132 S. Ct. 1095; 565 U.S. 1160; 80 U.S.L.W. 3425; 2012 WL 117610
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 588.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2011-11-28 · Published · cited 0× · 181 L. Ed. 2d 479; 2011 U.S. LEXIS 8476; 132 S. Ct. 797; 565 U.S. 1056; 80 U.S.L.W. 3317
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied. Petitioner is allowed until December 19, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court. Same case below, 418 Fed. Appx. 588.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1997-10-14 · Published · cited 0× · 522 U.S. 925; 118 S. Ct. 322
Ct. App. Ga. Certiorari denied.
Leventhal v. Bauerpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1999-01-11 · Published · cited 0× · 525 U.S. 1069
Gt. App. Ga. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1998-10-05 · Published · cited 0× · 525 U.S. 832
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1998-10-05 · Published · cited 0× · 525 U.S. 832; 119 S. Ct. 86
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Leventhal v. Bauerpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1999-01-11 · Published · cited 0× · 525 U.S. 1069; 119 S. Ct. 799
Gt. App. Ga. Certiorari denied.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1996-03-25 · Published · cited 27× · 194 B.R. 26; 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 333; 1996 WL 159472
194 B.R. 26 (1996) In re Marc LEVENTHAL, Debtor. COLONIAL NATIONAL BANK USA, Plaintiff, v. Marc LEVENTHAL, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 94 B 22218 (ASH). Adv. No. 95-5067A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. March 25, 1996. *27 Seth J. Farber, Robert Barsch, by Seth J. Farber, New York City, for Debtor. Sharin
Supreme Court of the United States · 1986-02-24 · Published · cited 0× · 475 U.S. 1024; 106 S. Ct. 1217; 54 U.S.L.W. 3563; 89 L. Ed. 2d 328; 1986 U.S. LEXIS 405
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1983-05-16 · Published · cited 0× · 461 U.S. 935; 103 S. Ct. 2103; 51 U.S.L.W. 3826; 77 L. Ed. 2d 309; 1983 U.S. LEXIS 4673
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012-11-16 · Published · cited 0× · 484 B.R. 731; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168411; 2012 WL 5878864
STATEMENT SUZANNE B. CONLON, District Judge. Gene Schenberg sued Howard Leven-thal in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois seeking a determination that a judgment debt Leventhal owed him was nondis-chargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(3)(B). Judgment was entered for Schenberg following a trial on the merits. The bankruptcy court denied Leventhal’s motion for a new
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018-07-05 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 NY Slip Op 4977
Leventhal v Bayside Cemetery (2018 NY Slip Op 04977) Leventhal v Bayside Cemetery 2018 NY Slip Op 04977 Decided on July 5, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursu
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992-05-27 · Published · cited 27× · 961 F.2d 936; 70 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5001; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 11500; 1992 WL 93115
PER CURIAM: The Government appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida instructing Robert A. Leventhal, an attorney, to provide the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) with some, but not all, of the information specified in an IRS summons. The IRS had issued the summons to obtain certain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016-11-23 · Published · cited 0× · 666 F. App'x 730
*732ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Carlos F. Lucero, Circuit Judge Dalip Basanti appeals from district court orders excluding proposed expert testimony and entering final judgment in favor of the United States. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm. I On October 28, 2009, Bas
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016-08-18 · Published · cited 55× · 833 F.3d 1366; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 15151; 2016 WL 4394602
Dyk, Circuit Judge. Mr. Anthony Piszel appeals from a judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“the Claims Court”) dismissing his complaint against the United States for failure to state a claim. That complaint alleged a taking and illegal exaction resulting from a statute and regulations barring the payment of so-called “golden parachute” compensation upon his ter
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016-05-23 · Published · cited 78× · 823 F.3d 970; 2016 WL 2957156
*971 BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Leonard Lopez appeals following a bench trial on his medical negligence claims. Lopez underwent lower back surgery at the Veterans Administration Medical Center of Denver, Colorado (VA Hospital), in order to alleviate longstanding sciatic pain. Immediately following
District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2013-01-17 · Published · cited 7× · 917 F. Supp. 2d 837; 2013 WL 203311
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES F. HOLDERMAN, Chief Judge: In his Second Amended Complaint, plaintiff Howard Leventhal (“Leventhal”) alleges that defendants Gene Byron Schenberg (“Schenberg”), Richard F. Huck, III (“Huck”); Michael J. McKitrick (“McKitrick”), and Danna McKitrick PC (“Danna McKitrick”) are liable for malicious prosecution (First Cause of Action) and abuse of process (Second C
Leventhal v. Reiserpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1983-10-03 · Published · cited 0× · 464 U.S. 845; 104 S. Ct. 147; 52 U.S.L.W. 3264; 78 L. Ed. 2d 138; 1983 U.S. LEXIS 1459
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.