⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Levesque”

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008-10-30 · Published · cited 47× · 546 F.3d 78; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 23075; 2008 WL 4742389
546 F.3d 78 (2008) UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Tammy LEVESQUE, Defendant, Appellant. No. 08-1344. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard October 7, 2008. Decided October 30, 2008. *79 Virginia G. Villa, Assistant Federal Defender, for appellant. Renee M. Bunker, Assistant United States Attorn
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997-04-03 · Published · cited 0×
USCA1 Opinion [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit ____________________ No. 96-1910 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Appellee,
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989-05-23 · Published · cited 0× · 879 F.2d 853; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 10582; 1989 WL 77104
879 F.2d 853 U.S.v.Levesque (Jonathan) NO. 88-1831 United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. MAY 23, 1989 Appeal From: D.N.H., 625 F.Supp. 428 1 AFFIRMED.
District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1985-12-13 · Published · cited 8× · 625 F. Supp. 428; 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12806
625 F.Supp. 428 (1985) UNITED STATES of America v. Jonathan S. LEVESQUE; Michael Blais; Stanley J. Fortier; Stephen C. Milton, a/k/a Steve Miller. Crim. Nos. 85-00020-01-D, 85-0020-02-D, 85-0020-04-D and 85-0020-06-D. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. December 13, 1985. *429 *430
Levesque v. Holderpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015-09-18 · Published · cited 0× · 802 F.3d 152; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 16659; 2015 WL 5474308
HOWARD, Chief Judge. At issue in this immigration case is whether an individual must serve a “term of imprisonment” to have committed an “aggravated felony” as that term is defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43). Relying on the plain language of the statute, we hold that a federal or state conviction can constitute an “aggravated felony” under this law even if the petitioner served no
District Court, D. Maine · 2005-02-03 · Published · cited 1× · 366 F. Supp. 2d 89; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2337; 2005 WL 757376
366 F.Supp.2d 89 (2005) Lora LEVESQUE, Plaintiff v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. CIV. 4-19-B-K. United States District Court, D. Maine. February 3, 2005. *90 Daniel G. Kagan, Berman & Simmons, P.A., Benjamin R. Gideon, Berman & Simmons, P.A., Lewiston, ME, for Plaintiff. Evan J. Roth, Office of the U.S.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1999-11-01 · Published · cited 0× · 528 U.S. 979; 120 S. Ct. 433
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012-06-25 · Published · cited 3× · 473 B.R. 331
OPINION DUNN, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtor appellants Frank and Bonnie Levesque (the “Levesques”) filed motions (collectively, “Motions”) to reopen their chapter 7 1 bankruptcy case and convert it to chapter 11. The bankruptcy court granted their motion to reopen but denied their motion to conve
Supreme Court of the United States · 1997-06-16 · Published · cited 0× · 520 U.S. 1280; 117 S. Ct. 2466
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1997-06-16 · Published · cited 0× · 520 U.S. 1280
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Torres v. Levesquepublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-05-05 · Published · cited 0× · 538 U.S. 1018
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1994-02-22 · Published · cited 0× · 510 U.S. 1115
Sup. Ct. N. H. Certiorari denied.
Torres v. Levesquepublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-05-05 · Published · cited 0× · 538 U.S. 1018
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Torres v. Levesquepublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-05-05 · Published · cited 0× · 538 U.S. 1018; 123 S. Ct. 1941
538 U.S. 1018 TORRESv.LEVESQUE ET AL. No. 02-9631. Supreme Court of United States. May 5, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. 2 C. A. 2
Supreme Court of the United States · 1994-02-22 · Published · cited 0× · 510 U.S. 1115; 114 S. Ct. 1061
510 U.S. 1115 Levesquev.Levesque. No. 93-965. Supreme Court of United States. February 22, 1994. 1 Appeal from the Sup. Ct. N. H. 2 Certiorari denied. Reported below: 137 N. H. 638
Supreme Court of the United States · 1998-06-15 · Published · cited 0× · 524 U.S. 927; 118 S. Ct. 2322
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1982-12-13 · Published · cited 0× · 459 U.S. 1089; 103 S. Ct. 574; 51 U.S.L.W. 3460; 74 L. Ed. 2d 936; 1982 U.S. LEXIS 4736
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982-06-22 · Published · cited 52× · 681 F.2d 75; 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 18063; 10 Fed. R. Serv. 1159
LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge. The appellants, Leonard and Raynard Levesque, are Passamaquoddy Indians. Because of their participation in certain violent events arising from a drunken brawl, they were prosecuted and convicted after a jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of Maine of having assaulted one A
District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996-06-03 · Published · cited 0×
Levesque v . United States CV-95-560-M 06/03/96 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Jonathan Levesque, Plaintiff, v. Civil N o . 95-560-M United States of America, Defendant. O R D E R Plaintiff, Jonathan Levesque, brings this civil rights action against defendant, the United States, seeking to remedy an alleged violation of t
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988-12-19 · Published · cited 12× · 864 F.2d 515; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 18014; 1988 WL 142973
HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge. Petitioner-appellant Wayne Levesque seeks by writ of habeas corpus to challenge the refusal of the Parole Commission to grant him parole. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner alleges that the Commission unlawfully ignored the findings of the sentencing court in determining the date of his parole. The district court dismissed the