Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Levesque”
United States v. Levesquepublic domain
546 F.3d 78 (2008) UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Tammy LEVESQUE, Defendant, Appellant. No. 08-1344. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard October 7, 2008. Decided October 30, 2008. *79 Virginia G. Villa, Assistant Federal Defender, for appellant. Renee M. Bunker, Assistant United States Attorn
United States v. Levesquepublic domain
USCA1 Opinion [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit ____________________ No. 96-1910 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Appellee,
United States v. Levesque (Jonathan)public domain
879 F.2d 853 U.S.v.Levesque (Jonathan) NO. 88-1831 United States Court of Appeals,First Circuit. MAY 23, 1989 Appeal From: D.N.H., 625 F.Supp. 428 1 AFFIRMED.
United States v. Levesquepublic domain
625 F.Supp. 428 (1985) UNITED STATES of America v. Jonathan S. LEVESQUE; Michael Blais; Stanley J. Fortier; Stephen C. Milton, a/k/a Steve Miller. Crim. Nos. 85-00020-01-D, 85-0020-02-D, 85-0020-04-D and 85-0020-06-D. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. December 13, 1985. *429 *430
Levesque v. Holderpublic domain
HOWARD, Chief Judge. At issue in this immigration case is whether an individual must serve a “term of imprisonment” to have committed an “aggravated felony” as that term is defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43). Relying on the plain language of the statute, we hold that a federal or state conviction can constitute an “aggravated felony” under this law even if the petitioner served no
Levesque v. United Statespublic domain
366 F.Supp.2d 89 (2005) Lora LEVESQUE, Plaintiff v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. CIV. 4-19-B-K. United States District Court, D. Maine. February 3, 2005. *90 Daniel G. Kagan, Berman & Simmons, P.A., Benjamin R. Gideon, Berman & Simmons, P.A., Lewiston, ME, for Plaintiff. Evan J. Roth, Office of the U.S.
Levesque v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
In re: Frank J. Levesque and Bonnie R. Levesquepublic domain
OPINION DUNN, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtor appellants Frank and Bonnie Levesque (the “Levesques”) filed motions (collectively, “Motions”) to reopen their chapter 7 1 bankruptcy case and convert it to chapter 11. The bankruptcy court granted their motion to reopen but denied their motion to conve
Levesque v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Levesque v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Torres v. Levesquepublic domain
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Levesque v. Levesquepublic domain
Sup. Ct. N. H. Certiorari denied.
Torres v. Levesquepublic domain
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Torres v. Levesquepublic domain
538 U.S. 1018 TORRESv.LEVESQUE ET AL. No. 02-9631. Supreme Court of United States. May 5, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. 2 C. A. 2
Levesque v. Levesquepublic domain
510 U.S. 1115 Levesquev.Levesque. No. 93-965. Supreme Court of United States. February 22, 1994. 1 Appeal from the Sup. Ct. N. H. 2 Certiorari denied. Reported below: 137 N. H. 638
Levesque v. Yamaguchipublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Levesque v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge. The appellants, Leonard and Raynard Levesque, are Passamaquoddy Indians. Because of their participation in certain violent events arising from a drunken brawl, they were prosecuted and convicted after a jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of Maine of having assaulted one A
Levesque v. United Statespublic domain
Levesque v . United States CV-95-560-M 06/03/96 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Jonathan Levesque, Plaintiff, v. Civil N o . 95-560-M United States of America, Defendant. O R D E R Plaintiff, Jonathan Levesque, brings this civil rights action against defendant, the United States, seeking to remedy an alleged violation of t
HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge. Petitioner-appellant Wayne Levesque seeks by writ of habeas corpus to challenge the refusal of the Parole Commission to grant him parole. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner alleges that the Commission unlawfully ignored the findings of the sentencing court in determining the date of his parole. The district court dismissed the