Cases

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. This appeal is part of a complex dispute over costs that resulted from contractor defaults in completing a federal government construction project. After partial summary judgment rulings and a bench trial, the district court1 entered judgment against a subcontractor's surety, International Fidelity Insurance Co. ("Fidelity"), and in favor of the general contractor's surety, Liberty

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alexander W. Hunter, Jr., J.), entered on or about January 6, 2015, which granted the petition to permanently stay arbitration pursuant to CPLR 7503, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and the petition granted to the extent of temporarily staying the arbitration sought by respondent Phillip Robles, and remanding the matter to allow for the addition of proposed additi

532 F.Supp.2d 248 (2008) LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and Subsidiaries, Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civil Action No. 05-11048-RCL. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 23, 2008. *249 Paul F. Lynch, Latronico, John A. La: mire, Black & Whitestone, Boston, MA, Samuel A. Mitchell, Gr

DENNIS JACOBS, Circuit Judge: Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. operates a self-insured employee health plan. A Vermont statute requires all “health insurers” (including self-insured plans) to file with the State reports containing claims data and other “information relating to health care.” A State regulation specifies how such information must be recorded and transmitted. When Vermont subpoenaed claims data

Opinion and Order BLOCK, Judge. This case involves the intricacies of surety-ship law. In particular, the primary (and seemingly simple) issue is one that has bedeviled this court since its founding in the mid-Nineteenth Century: under what circumstances may a surety sue the United States? Correspondingly, since all federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, what exactly is the jurisdictional predicate fo

MEMORANDUM OPINION Keith L. Phillips, United States Bankruptcy Judge This matter comes before the Court on the Complaint for Determination of Non-dischargeability of Debt filed by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (“Liberty’ or the “Plaintiff’) seeking to have debts owed by Timothy Allen Ward, Sr. (the “Debtor” or “Defendant”) excepted from discharge. Trial of the matter

ORDER After sustaining an on-the-job injury and accepting a workers’ compensation settlement for that injury, Orlando Coryell sued his employer, its insurance carrier, and the United States Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), claiming that all involved had violated the Medical Secondary Payer Act. At the defendants’ urging, the district court dismissed the complaint. Coryell appeals, but we dismiss the case as moot. <

ORDER After sustaining an on-the-job injury and accepting a workers’ compensation settlement for that injury, Orlando Coryell sued his employer, its insurance carrier, and the United States Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), claiming that all involved had violated the Medical Secondary Payer Act. At the defendants’ urging, the district court dismissed the complaint. Coryell appeals, but we dismiss the case as moot. <

Petition for rehearing denied. Former decision, 559 U.S. 1096, 130 S. Ct. 2377, 176 L. Ed. 2d 774, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 3612.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the Appeals Court of Massachusetts denied. Same case below, 74 Mass. App. 1125, 909 N.E.2d 558.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.

Petition for rehearing denied. Former decision, 559 U.S. 1078, 130 S. Ct. 2120, 176 L. Ed. 2d 741, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 3411.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE GLENN CARPENTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) C.A. No.: N23C-06-081 FJJ v. ) LIBERTY MUTUAL ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Defendants.

Page 50 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL July 7, 2020 110 JULY, 2020 335 Conn. 110 Vera v. Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co. STEVEN L. VERA ET AL. v. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY (SC 20178) Robinson, C. J., and Palmer, McDonald, D’Auria, Mul

KING, Circuit Judge. In 2009, the United States by Lamesa National Bank filed suit against Liberty *500 Mutual Insurance Company, asserting that Liberty Mutual was liable under a federally-required surety bond for the alleged misconduct of its principal, a trustee in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceed

Sup. Ct. N. Y., Erie County; and Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until December 6, 2004, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Rife & Hall Coal Company seek review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of living miner benefits to former employee Greley Justus and survivor’s benefits to J

453 B.R. 815 (2011) In re Robert Dean SCHOOLER and Tina Marie Schooler, Debtors. United States of America by Lamesa National Bank, Plaintiff v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 01-51003-RLJ-7. Adversary No. 09-05011. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas, Lubbock Division. March 31, 2011. *816

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PHANTA U. DARAMY-ANDREWS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 22-1694 (TJK) LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In April 2019, Plaintiff’s home and personal property were damaged by flooding caused by a burst pipe in her basement. De

433 B.R. 62 (2010) In re Lynn CITRON and Jeffrey Citron, Debtors. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, as Fiduciary for the Bankruptcy Estate of Lynn Citron and Jeffrey Citron, Plaintiff, v. The State of New York, Bing Li and the Law Offices of Bing Li, LLC, and Frank Paone, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 08-71442-ast. Adversary No. 09-08126-ast. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York.