Cases

9 F.3d 761 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Leticia CASTANEDA, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Ismael BARRON, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Maria MERAS, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Uriel CASTANEDA, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Terezo

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

OPINION D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judge: OVERVIEW This consolidated appeal is brought by eleven individuals involved in an extensive conspiracy to distribute cocaine and heroin. Appellants raise a multitude of issues, the majority of which are considered in a separate, unpublished disposition. Our concern here is with appellants’ appeals from their jury convictions for use of a weapon in re

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0247p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-Appellee,

OPINION WARDLAW, Circuit Judge: Every day along the southwest border, previously deported aliens lacking entry documents are arrested, detained, and charged with illegal reentry. Once convicted, they serve a term of imprisonment, and then are again deported. The numbers are so great that federal prosecutors in these border states began to resort to an ef

BERZON, Circuit Judge: ORDER The opinion filed February 20, 2014, and published at 743 F.3d 666, is withdrawn. The superseding opinion shall be filed concurrently with this order. Further petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc shall be allowed in the above-captioned matter. See G.O. 5.3(a).

*670 OPINION BERZON, Circuit Judge: The government appeals the dismissal of Xóchitl Garcia-Santana’s indictment for unlawful reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The district court determined that Garcia’s prior removal order was constitutionally inadequate because Garcia was d

Opinion by Judge PAEZ; Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI. PAEZ, Circuit Judge: Following Juan Jose Vidal’s plea of guilty to a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, the district court imposed an eight-level sentence enhancement, pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines” or “U.S.S.G.”) § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C) (2002),1 based on Vidal’s 1994 conviction

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 04-50185 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-03-01178-1- JUAN JOSE VIDAL, JTM Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Distric

326 F.Supp.2d 243 (2004) UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff v. Juan Carlos MENDOZA ROLON, Jose O. Ramos Berrios, German Ayala Ramos, Sealed Defendant Defendants No. CR. 04-194(SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. July 12, 2004. *244 *245 Antonio R. Bazán-González, AUSA, United S

FISHER, Circuit Judge. Miguel Arellano-Torres challenges his sentence for illegal reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. His appeal presents the question of whether his 1999 Nevada conviction for simple drug possession is an aggravated felony as defined by 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43). We hold that it is and affirm the sentence. We also reject Arellano’s con

THOMAS, Circuit Judge: We considered this appeal en banc to determine whether a violation of California Health and Safety Code § 11360(a) constitutes an aggravated felony for the purposes of sentencing pursuant to United *907 States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) § 2L1.2(b)(l

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 23, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D18-742 Lower Tribunal No. 17-6368 ________________ People’s Trust Insurance Company,

Opinion by Judge GRABER; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge B. FLETCHER. Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge IKUTA. OPINION GRABER, Circuit Judge: Petitioner Joseph Young petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming a final order of removability. The BIA held that Petitioner is ineligible for cancellation of removal bec

Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Judicial Branch’s homepage at http://www.courts.state.co.us. Opinions are also posted on the Colorado Bar Association’s homepage at http://www.cobar.org. ADVANCE SHEET HEADNOTE April 17, 2017

457 F.Supp.2d 898 (2006) Jocelyn Isada BOLANTE, Petitioner, v. Deborah ACHIM, et al., Respondents. No. 06C0907. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. October 18, 2006. *899 Stanley J. Horn, Christian Schmidt, Linda M. Stojkovich, Yehuda J. Azulay, Azulay Horn & Seiden LLC, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner. Lisa T. W

Lenk, J. After a jury trial in the Superior Court, the defendants, Isaiah Monteiro and Esau DePina, were each found guilty of murder in the first degree on a theory of deliberate premeditation, as well as of related offenses, in the shooting death of the victim, Anthony Hamilton, on November 16, 2009. 1 In this direct appe

508 F.3d 899 (2007) Ruben Fernando BARRAGAN-LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY,[*] Attorney General, Respondent. No. 05-73883. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 19, 2007. Filed November 21, 2007. *901 Tarik H. Sultan (argued), Wolf & Sultan P.C., Tucs

2009 ND 84 Candace E. Luger, Joan M. Netterville, Mary P. Swallow, Lisa S. Kampeska, and Jeffrey Kurt Luger, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. Robert Luger and Raymond Luger, Defendants and Appellants. No. 20080194. Supreme Court of North Dakota. Decided May 14, 2009. Steven L. Latham (appeared) and James W. Martens (argued), Larson Latham Bliss Huettl, LLP, 521 East Mai

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RUBEN FERNANDO BARRAGAN-LOPEZ,  Petitioner, No. 05-73883 v.  Agency No. A78-683-478 MICHAEL B. MUKASEY,* Attorney General, OPINION Respondent.