Cases

PER CURIAM.* Concepcion Lopez-Mejia appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Lopez-Mejia contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offe

114 F.3d 1202 U.S.v.Lopez-Mejia* NO. 96-5128 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. May 08, 1997 Appeal From: S.D.Fla. ,No.9500898CRUUB 1 Affirmed.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mario Humberto Mejia-Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mejia-Lopez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and

EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge: Guillermo Mejia, Jorge Ortega and Ramon Lopez appeal drug convictions. We affirm. Jose Benitez, a confidential informant working under the supervision of Special Agent Paul Grimal, was placed on a boat going from Miami to Columbia, South America. Benitez was to gather intelligence on the Columbian drug trade and (if contacted

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-3651 ___________________________ Mario Mejia-Lopez; Silvia Lorena Rodas-Ordonez; Erick Fernando Mejia-Rodas; Meylin Lorena Mejia-Rodas; Luis Mario Mejia-Rodas lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioners v.

Per Curiam: Defendant-Appellant Fabio Porfirio Lobo ("Lobo") appeals from a sentence imposed pursuant to a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Schofield, J .). Lobo pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to manufacture and distribute, and to import into the United States, five or more kilograms of cocaine, in violation of

SUMMARY ORDER Co-defendants-appellants Manuel Geral-do, Hargelis Vargas, and Jugo Cespedes (collectively, “defendants”) appeal from sentences and final judgments of conviction entered on October 30, 2015, November 25, 2015, and December 3, 2015, respectively, each by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Engelmayer, J.). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, procedural history,

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

628 F.3d 93 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jose Lopez AREVALO, also known as Payaso, Javier Irheta, also known as Juan Campos, also known as Speedy, Hector Portillo, also known as Chucky, also known as Angel, Luis Bonilla, also known as Chofre, Luis Valle Blanco, also known as Anvil, Francisco Valle Blanco, also known as Warden Hunter, also known as Silent, Nelson Mauricio Portillo Alas, also known as Snack, Wilmer Vindell Betanco,

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 16-1339 _____________ ROSA ELIDA CASTRO; A.A.G.C.; LAURA LISSETH FLORES-PICHINTE; E.S.U.F.; KAREN MARGARITA ZELAYA ALBERTO; S.E.A.Z; KELLY GUTIERREZ RUBIO; G.J.S.G.; GLADIS CARRASCO GOMEZ; B.J.R.C.; WENDY AMPARO OSORIO MARTINEZ; D.S.R.O.; CARMEN LEIVA-MENJIVAR; E.A.M.L.; A.M.M.L.; DINA ISAB

63 F.3d 1468 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6319, 95 Daily JournalD.A.R. 10,779UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose LOPEZ-FLORES; Jose Eduardo Hernandez; JosePerez-Garcia; and Jaime Ortiz-Mejia, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 93-50206, 93-50208, 93-50211 and 93-50216. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. No. 93-50206 was Submitted on

*1180C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 100 Fed. Appx. 524; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 247; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 104 Fed. Appx. 436; C. A. 8th Cir. Reported below: 367 F. 3d 805; *1181No. 04-7844. No

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED. Defendant Tranquilinia LeguizamonDiaz (“Defendant”), a Paraguayan national, was convicted after a jury trial of bribery of a public official and conspiracy to bribe a public official, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 201(b)(1)(A), 2, 371. The district court (McAvoy, J.) sentenced Def

SUMMARY ORDER ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and hereby is AFFIRMED. Defendant-appellant Maria Rosalba Guevara appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (McAvoy, /.), convicting her, following a jury trial, of, inter alia, conspiring to distribute and possess with inte

535 F.3d 1021 (2008) Guillermo GARCIA-AGUILAR, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR The SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent, United States of America, Real Party in Interest. In re Erick Manjarrez-Cervantez, Petitioner, Erick Manjarrez-Cervantez, Petitioner, v. United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Respondent, United States of America, Real Party in Interest. In re Fre

(Reported below: 101 Fed. Appx. 516); (101 Fed. Appx. 466); (101 Fed. Appx. 513); (101 Fed. Appx. 458); (101 Fed. Appx. 511); (101 Fed. Appx. 451); (101 Fed. Appx. 541); (101 Fed. Appx. 520); (101 Fed. Appx. 496); (101 Fed. Appx. 463); (101 Fed. Appx. 489); (101 Fed. Appx. 4

*982(Reported below: 87 Fed. Appx. 930); (85 Fed. Appx. 363); (83 Fed. Appx. 620); (85 Fed. Appx. 367); (82 Fed. Appx. 901); (83 Fed. Appx. 622); (82 Fed. Appx. 902); (83 Fed. Appx. 623); (82 Fed. Appx. 908); (82 Fed. Appx. 904); (83 F

(Reported below: 72 Fed. Appx. 219); (71 Fed. Appx. 428); (72 Fed. Appx. 984); (72 Fed. Appx. 995); (71 Fed. Appx. 433); (73 Fed. Appx. 694); (73 Fed. Appx. 72); (72 Fed. Appx. 991); (71 Fed. Appx. 418); (71 Fed. Appx. 430); (72 Fed. Appx. 982); (72 Fed. Appx. 225);

MEMORANDUM ** Lucio Mejia-Leal appeals the 77-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry following removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a), and we vacate and remand. Mejia-Leal contends, among other things, that the government failed to provide the sentencing court with sufficient document

(Reported below: 72 Fed. Appx. 219); (71 Fed. Appx. 428); (72 Fed. Appx. 984); (72 Fed. Appx. 995); (71 Fed. Appx. 433); (73 Fed. Appx. 694); (73 Fed. Appx. 72); (72 Fed. Appx. 991); (71 Fed. Appx. 418); (71 Fed. Appx. 430); (72 Fed. Appx. 982); (72 Fed. Appx. 225);