Cases

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201700034 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. ANDRES A. MAGANA Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

MEMORANDUM ** Aureliano Arroyo Magana appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 240-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 886 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), appellant’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as couns

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Leonel Magana appeals from the 27-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Magana contends that the district court failed to consider certain evidence of his drug abuse problems in its analysis under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

544 F.Supp.2d 560 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Hermerejildo MAGANA, Jr., Defendant. No. SA-07-CR-470-RF. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division. March 13, 2008. *561 Charlie Strauss, Assistant United States Attorney, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff. R. Clark Adams, Federal Public De

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Leonel Magana appeals from the 27-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Magana contends that the district court failed to consider certain evidence of his drug abuse problems in its analysis under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the *201district court be AFFIRMED as to the convictions and the case is REMANDED for sentencing proceedings consistent with United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), and United States v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103 (2d Cir.

546 F.3d 957 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Juan MAGANA-AGUIRRE, Appellant. No. 08-1985. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: October 13, 2008. Filed: November 24, 2008. *958 Angela L. Pitts, FPD, Little Rock, Arkansas, for appellant. Christopher D. Plumlee, AUSA, Forth

MEMORANDUM2 On Remand from the United States Supreme Court Defendants Magana and Alcantar were indicted for conspiracy to manufacture, *4distribute, and possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute; they were also indicted for aiding and abetting the manufacture of methamphetamine and the possession of methamphetamine with the in

MEMORANDUM ** Rafael Magana-Valencia, Jr. appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea for possession with intent to distribute and distribution of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). As part of his plea agreement, MaganaValencia waived his right to appeal his conviction or sentence. Relying on the Supreme Court’s holding in the subsequently decided United States

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM * Having heard oral argument on the petition for rehearing in this case, we grant the petition and remand for re-sentencing in accord with United States v. Ameline, 376 F.3d 967 (9th Cir.2004). Because the parties are familiar with the facts and history of this ease we will not recount it here. In the initial appeal before this panel, Magana’s attorney filed a

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge. Defendant Antonio Rodriguez Magana was indicted for one count of knowingly “attempting to possess, obtain, and receive ... [counterfeit] alien registration receipts cards, commonly called ‘green cards,” ’ in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 1546(a) and for two counts of knowingly and willfully making materially false statements and representations to both a United States Post Office clerk and posta

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ Nos. 06-3350 & 06-3351 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VERNON BONNER AND MARIA MAGANA-BONNER, Defendants-Appellants. ____________ Appeals from the United States Distr

MEMORANDUM ** Petitioner-Appellant Luis Alberto Magana-Ayala (“Ayala”) pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. After the District Court sentenced him, Ayala filed a motion to extend time to file a notice of appeal. He now appeals the District Court’s denial of that motion, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4), for failure to show good cause or excusable neglect. We review a district c

O’TOOLE, District Judge. Adolfo Magana was convicted by a jury of entering into a sham marriage to evade the immigration laws, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1325(b). His codefendant Ana Maria Meda-Santos was convicted of aiding and abetting Magana’s crime. 18 U.S.C. § 2. Both defendants were also convicted of conspiracy to defraud the United States. 18 U.S.C. § 371.

MEMORANDUM2 Rafael Magana-Ojeda appeals his conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, and sentence for being an alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Relying on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), Magana-Ojeda contends that the district court erred when it increased his base offense level by 16 points, because the

MEMORANDUM2 Zeferino Magana-Urbanes appeals his 57-month sentence imposed following conviction by guilty plea to a single count of being found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S .C. § 3742(a). We review de novo, United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411, 412-13 (9th Cir.2000), and affirm.

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge. The principal question in these appeals is when lying to a pretrial services officer amounts to an obstruction of justice under the Sentencing Guidelines. I The man known to us as Antonio Magana-Guerrero1 had nine prior convictions when he was arrested in connection with this ease: three for selling narcotics, one for possessing nar

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Case below, 553 Fed.Appx. 699.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.