Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
6 opinions for “United States v. Marcial-Mora”
United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.public domain
MILLS, C. J. The bill of complaint in this suit was originally filed on May 24, 1897, on .behalf of the United States, by their attorney-general, in the district court of the Third Judicial District of New Mexico, against the Rio Grande Dam and Irrigation Company, the purpose of which was to restrain the defendant from constructing a dam across the Rio Grande, in the Territory of New Mexico, and appropriat
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO EN EL TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL IV JUAN VIERA BATISTA Apelación procedente del Apelado Tribunal de Primera Instancia v. TA2026AP00109 Sala Superior de San Juan LUIS MÁRQUEZ SÁNCHEZ Civil N
Edumoz, LLC v. Republic of Mozambiquepublic domain
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge. On October 5, 2012, EduMoz, LLC filed this action against the Republic of Mozambique and the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Mozambique (“the government defendants”), Celio Mondlane, Joaquim Chissano Foundation, and Joaquim Chissano (“the Foundation defendants”), and Zeferino Martins.1 On
453 F.Supp. 22 (1978) SIDERIUS, INC., Plaintiff, v. COMPANIA de ACERO del PACIFICO, S. A., Defendant. No. 78 Civ. 281 (VLB). United States District Court, S. D. New York. April 25, 1978. *23 Vincent, Berg, Russo, Marcigliano & Zawacki, New York City, for plaintiff. Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, New York City,
In re Empresas Omajede Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER Enrique S. Lamoutte, United States Bankruptcy Judge This case is before the court upon Empresas Omajede, Inc.’s (hereinafter referred to as the “Debtor”) Objection to Proof of Claim Number 5 Filed by Banco Popular de Puerto Rico. The objection hinges on the interpretation of certain contractual clauses regarding the late fees and default rate (or additional late fees) wh
Board of County Com'rs v. New Mexico & S. P. R.public domain
Bristol, J. Each of the above entitled causes was instituted in 'the district court for the First judicial district and county of Santa Fe, by the defendant in error, the New Mexico & Southern Pacific Bailroad Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the territory, against the board of county commissioners of said county of Santa Fe, by filing a verified petition alleging the exi