Cases

LOKEN, Circuit Judge. The United States appeals the sixteen-month sentence Santiago Maul-Valverde received after he pleaded guilty to a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b), which prohibits previously deported aliens from illegally reentering the United States. The district court departed downward from Maul-Valverde’s Guidelines range of 37-46 months on the ground that application of U.S.S.G

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Geoffrey D. Wright, J.), entered May 21, 2013, which denied without prejudice defendant Commissioner’s (ACS) motion for partial summary judgment and to decertify or modify the class, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order, same court, Justice, and entry date, which denied plaintiffs-intervenors’ motion to compel discovery, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, and the motion granted, insofar as plaintif

PER CURIAM. Maul Brothers, Inc. (hereinafter Maul) appeals from the denial of its motion to intervene in this antitrust action as a party defendant pursuant to Rule 24(a)(2) Fed.R. Civ.P. The United States filed the underlying action in this case in 1939 to break up an alleged conspiracy by defendants to divide markets in the glass container and glass making machinery industries,

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Geoffrey D. Wright, J.), entered May 21, 2013, which denied without prejudice defendant Commissioner’s (ACS) motion for partial summary judgment and to decertify or modify the class, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order, same court, Justice, and entry date, which denied plaintiffs-intervenors’ motion to compel discovery, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, and the motion granted, insofar as plaintif

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered May 1, 2008, which granted plaintiffs-intervenors’ motion for class certification, and denied the motion of defendant-appellant New York City Administration for Children’s Services for partial summary judgment, affirmed, without costs. Plaintiffs-intervenors are mentally retarded and developmentally disabled individuals. All of them are, or were, in the foster care syst

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered May 1, 2008, which granted plaintiffs-intervenors’ motion for class certification, and denied the motion of defendant-appellant New York City Administration for Children’s Services for partial summary judgment, affirmed, without costs. Plaintiffs-intervenors are mentally retarded and developmentally disabled individuals. All of them are, or were, in the foster care system

*349OPINION OF THE COURT David Demarest, J. In this proceeding under Civil Practice Law and Rules § 7801, Bruce Dix, Esq., Director of the Mental Hygiene Legal Service (MHLS), petitions for an order requiring Thomas Maul, Commissioner of the New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities (OMRDD), and Joseph Colarusso, Direc

CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Roy McGhie, having been found incompetent to stand trial on a misdemeanor charge, was remanded to a New York state psychiatric center for a brief period, to evaluate whether he presented a danger to himself or others warranting invocation of New York’s civil commitment law. His confinement there prompted his suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in which he claims defendants Joel Dvoskin and Lucy Rae

255 F.Supp.2d 73 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. State of NEW YORK, George E. Pataki, Governor of the State of New York, Brian J. Wing, Acting New York State Commissioner of Social Services, Barbara A. DeBuono, New York State Commissioner of Public Health, James L. Stone, New York State Commissioner of Mental Health, Thomas A. Maul, New York State Commissioner of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, Richard P. Mills,

ORDER Joyce Maul, an Indianapolis resident proceeding pro se, sued her local telephone service provider, Indiana Bell, alleging that it failed to address her repeated complaints that it crossed another telephone line with her private line, and that as a result unknown persons answer, eavesdrop on, and interrupt her calls. When the district court directed Maul to identify the basis for the court’s jurisdiction, she alleged tha

979 F.2d 627 61 USLW 2322 John P. LANNAN, as Conservator for the Estate of AshleyJoAnne Brewer, a Minor, Appellant,v.Thomas M. MAUL, as Personal Representative of the Estate ofThomas Eugene Brewer; Wayne Grachek, as Trusteeof the Thomas Eugene Brewer TestamentaryTrust, Appellees. No. 91-3249. United States Court of Appeals,

Walter Maul was indicted for the offenses of rape in the first degree, in violation of § 13A-6-61, Code of Alabama 1975, and sodomy in the first degree, in violation of § 13A-6-63, Code of Alabama 1975. The trial court granted the State's motion to consolidate Maul's cases with those of two of his codefendants: 1) Larry Williams, who was indicted for the offenses of rape in the first degree and sodomy in the first d

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-435 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 8:20-cr-00171- v. JVS-FWS-5 JESUS RAMIRO GOMEZ, AKA Hunter, OPINION Defendant

214 F.3d 350 (2nd Cir. 2000) CHARLES W., ANTHONY L., GEORGE K., on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated individuals, and MENTAL DISABILITY LAW CLINIC, TOURO LAW CENTER, Plaintiffs,ROY MCGHIE, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.THOMAS MAUL, in his official capacity of Commissioner of the New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, ROSALYN RICHTER, in her official capacity of New York City Criminal Court Jud

. McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. John P. Lannan, as the conservator for the Estate of Ashley JoAnne Brewer, a minor, appeals from a final order entered in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska dismissing his breach of contract action for lack of jurisdiction. The district court held that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the case fell within the “domestic relations exception” to diversity juris

270 N.J. Super. 596 (1994) 637 A.2d 928 BILLIE JANE MAUL, LIDA M. STELLA, ELAINE B. ZARYCRANSKI, DOROTHY B. KAUFMANN, HARRIET OSTERWEIS, THEODORE E. LAPRES, JR., AND FIRST FIDELITY BANK, N.A., AS CO-TRUSTEES UNDER THE WILLS OF THEODORE E. LAPRES AND MARIE T. LAPRES, AND THOMAS L. GLENN, JR., AND FIRST FIDELITY BANK, N.A., AS CO-TRUSTEES UNDER THE WILL OF THOMAS L. GLENN, SR., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS/CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. ELW

PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from an order of the District Court granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the petition filed by appellant, Maul Brothers, Inc., for determination of a reasonable royalty for a license which Maul was desirous of acquiring, under two of Emhart Corporation’s patents. In 1939 an antitrust suit was filed against Emhart, then known as Hartford-Empire, charging violation of Section

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-55685 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-01134- v. WQH-BLM YOUNES NASRI, OPINION Claimant-Appellant, v. $1,152,366.18 IN FUNDS FROM BENDURA BANK AG, PORTFOLIO NUMBER XX5.280, Hel

Mr. Justice Van Devanter delivered the opinion of the Court. This is a libel .of information for the forfeiture of the Underwriter, an American vessel enrolled and licensed for the coastwise trade. Five causes of forfeiture are set *503forth. One is that, in violation of § 4377 of the Revised Statutes, the vessel was employed in a trade other

Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted.