Cases

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before DALY, KISOR, and BROWN Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Elijah T. MAY Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before WOODARD, HITESMAN, and CRISFIELD, Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. William J. MAY Private First Class (E-2), U.S. Marine Corps

hearing, the Court meets with the probation officer assigned to the case to discuss his or her sentencing recommendation and ask relevant questions, akin to the Com1's meetings with its law clerks in preparation for hearings. If probation officers' written recommendations are shared with the parties, should discussions in chambers about those recommendations be made on the record and shared as well? This level of disclosure would inhibit the Court's efforts to arrive at an appropriate sen

MARTHA CRAIG DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge. Defendant James May pleaded guilty to a charge of being a felon in possession of both ammunition and a firearm and was sentenced as an armed career criminal to 200 months in prison. On appeal, May contends that the district court erroneously determined that he previously had been convicted of the three predicate offenses necessary to justify enhanced sentencing under the Armed Career Crim

OPINION OF THE COURT RENDELL, Circuit Judge. This appeal raises a single issue: whether a district court may reduce a defendant’s sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(e)(2), the statutory provision allowing a court to reduce a sentence which is “based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission,” when that sentence is imposed pursuant to a binding plea agreement. The D

568 F.3d 597 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark W. MAY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-3465. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: January 20, 2009. Decided and Filed: June 9, 2009. *600 ARGUED: Kevin M. Schad, Schad & Schad, Lebanon, Ohio, for Appellant. S. Robert Lyon

OPINION OF THE COURT RENDELL, Circuit Judge. This appeal raises a single issue: whether a district court may reduce a defendant’s sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(e)(2), the statutory provision allowing a court to reduce a sentence which is “based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission,” when that sentence is imposed pursuant to a binding plea agreement. The D

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 09a0206p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

535 F.3d 912 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. David Louis MAY, Appellant. No. 07-3515. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: May 13, 2008. Filed: July 31, 2008. *914 James F. Whalen, AFPD, argued, Des Moines, IA, for appellant. Andrew H. Kahl, AUSA, argued, Shannon Olson,

475 F.Supp.2d 1102 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Billie Eugene MAY, Defendant. No. 06-40005-01-JAR. United States District Court, D. Kansas. February 26, 2007. *1103 Jason R. Coody, Office of United States Attorney, Topeka, KS, for Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION ROBINSON, D

MEMORANDUM ** David May appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for bringing in illegal aliens without presentation and aiding and abetting, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(iii) and 18 U.S.C. § 2, respectively. May contends that the government breached the plea agreement during sentencing by failing to recommend the low end of the Sentenc

440 F.Supp.2d 1016 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Chad Michael MAY (06), and Christian Darryl Veith (07), Defendants. Criminal No. 06-08 (06), (07) (RHK/RLE). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. July 10, 2006. *1017 *1018 *1019

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 05a0089p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, - UNIT

493 F.Supp.2d 942 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Mark MAY, et al., Defendant. No. CR-3-03-094. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. February 25, 2004. *943 Gregory Von Schaumburg, Richard J. Gorman, Securities and Exchange Commission, Midwest Regional Office, Chicago, IL, J. Richard Chema, As

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellant, v.  No. 03-4589 ROBERT NELSON MAY, Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen,

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Defendant Barry S. May was charged with two conspiracy counts: involvement in a conspiracy to distribute cocaine and involvement in a conspiracy to distribute marijuana. May pled guilty to the marijuana count and as part of his plea agreement the cocaine count was dismissed. Now May appeals, arguing that the district court erroneously augmented his senten

199 F.Supp.2d 536 (2002) UNITED STATES of America v. Alexander Frederick MAY a/k/a Fred May; Joseph P. Mortimer; Rod Jenkins; James Larry Favre a/k/a Larry Favre; and Robbie Holden No. CRIM.1:01CR70GR-01. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division. February 22, 2002. *537 Thomas E. Royals, Thomas E. Royals

145 F.Supp.2d 57 (2001) UNITED STATES of America v. Reggie Eugene MAY. Criminal No. 92-93 SSH. United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 24, 2001. AUSA Robert D. Okun, Chief, Special Proceedings Section, Office of the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, Washington, DC, for plaintiff. A.J. Kramer, Federal Public Defender, Washing

Opinion of the Court GIERKE, Judge: A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of carnal knowledge, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 920. The adjudged and approved sentence provides for a bad-conduct discharge and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the f

211 B.R. 991 (1997) UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Lester Houston MAY, Jr., and Margaret Ann May, Appellees (Two Cases). Nos. 95-24-CIV-ORL-18, 95-75-CIV-ORL-18. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. August 21, 1997. *992 Bruce T. Russell, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for U.S., I.R.S.