Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. McCampbell”
United States v. McCAMPBELLpublic domain
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before STEPHENS, STARITA, and DEERWESTER Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Tyler G. M C CAMPBELL Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: Before 1963, there was no Padre Island National Park off the coast of the State of Texas. It took a lot of maneuvering between the State of Texas and the United States to create the national park out of these coastal island lands, much belonging to the State of Texas, some belonging to private parties. The Texas Consent Statute, the deeds of conveyance, the federal Enabling Act of 1962, and the
McCampbell v. Grimespublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Blackpublic domain
POOLER, Circuit Judge: The case before us treads on familiar ground-the fundamental protections for criminal defendants that are enshrined in the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution. Defendants-Appellees Rodshaun Black, Daniel Rodriguez, and Ernest Green (collectively, "Defendants-Appellees") were indicted on March 6, 2012, and charged with one count of Hobbs Act conspiracy. On March 7, 2012, prosecutors informed the district cour
United States v. Laceypublic domain
Honorable Susan M. Brnovich, United States District Judge There are seven defendants in this matter. Of which, six have joined the motion before the Court. Defendants Joye Vaught and Andrew Padilla filed a motion to dismiss the indictment against them or, in the alternative, a motion to allow their counsel to withdraw. (Doc. 456). Defendants James Larkin (Doc. 463), Scott Spear (Doc. 464), Michael Lacey (Doc. 465), and John Brunst (
25 F.3d 1057NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Mary K. HUDSON, Plaintiff-Ap
Estate of McCampbell v. Commissionerpublic domain
OPINION GERBER, Judge: Petitioner, by means of a motion to correct transcript filed August 25, 1989, attempts to correct the transcript of the trial conducted at San Antonio, Texas, on March 14, 1989. Petitioner references five places in the transcript where it is contended that the transcript is incorrect. Three of the requested changes concern situations whe
United States v. Kingpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: FORFEITURE STEPHEN P. FRIOT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Table of Contents I. Introduction... 881 A. The Criminal Charges.. .882 B. The Trials and Convictions... 883 C. The Moving Papers and Evidentiary Hearing.. .884 II. Authority for Forfeiture... 886 A
United States v. Kingpublic domain
ORDER STEPHEN P. FRIOT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Defendant Bartiee King’s “Second Motion To Suppress Illegally Obtained Evidence” is before the court. Doc. no. 982. The government has responded, doc. no. *11151031, and Mr. King filed a reply brief. Doc. no. 1070. An evidentiary hearing was held on January 13, 2015.1
112 F.3d 1283 27 Envtl. L. Rep. 21,149 DUNN-McCAMPBELL ROYALTY INTEREST, INC., a Texas Corporation;Dunn-Padre Corporation, a Texas Corporation;McCampbell Minerals, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, an Agency of the United StatesDepartment of Interior; Butch Farabee, in hisofficial capacity as Superintendent forthe Padre Island NationalSeashore,Defendants-Appelle
EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge, dissenting: With due respect to my colleagues, I am not convinced that the statute of limitations has run against Dunn-McCampbell in this case. I would reverse and remand for further proceedings that would elicit when Dunn-McCampbell first began to be injured by the cost of compliance with the regulations. It is important to clarify, as the majority has not d
Corvette McCampbell v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Nov 09 2016, 6:40 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK court except for the purpose of establishing Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals the de
964 F.Supp. 1125 (1995) DUNN McCAMPBELL ROYALTY INTEREST, INC., a Texas Corporation, Dunn-Padre Corporation, a Texas Corporation and McCampbell Minerals, Inc., a Texas Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, an agency of the United States Department of Interior and Butch Farabee, in his official capacity as Superintendent for the Padre Island National Seashore, Defendants. Civ.A.No. C-94-105. <
THIRD DIVISION DOYLE, P. J., GOBEIL, J., and SENIOR JUDGE FULLER NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules March 12
United States v. McConnelpublic domain
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Joseph Edward McConnel was convicted by a jury of four counts arising from his sales of firearms. The indictment alleged these offenses: Count 1, dealing in firearms without a license in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(1)(A); Counts 2 and 3, selling firearms to a person previously convicted of a felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 92
United States v. Cordovapublic domain
TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge. On March 9, 2005, Defendant-Appellant Armando Cordova, II, stipulated to allegations by his probation officer that he failed to comply with the terms of his supervised release. Based on the stipulation, the District Court revoked Mr. Cordova’s supervised release and sentenced him to 36 months’ incarceration. On appeal, Mr. Cordova argues that the revo
Dolenz v. United Statespublic domain
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs Jerome and Lupe Dolenz brought this action against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680, for injuries sustained by Mr. Dolenz in an automobile accident with a government vehicle driven by a Department of Agriculture employee. Following a bench trial, the district court found in favor of plaintiffs o
United States v. Leonardpublic domain
McCONNELL, Circuit Judge. On June 14, 2003, David Leonard, an unlicensed driver, collided head-on with a vehicle driven by Gail Sankadota. Ms. Sankadota’s pregnant daughter was killed in the accident and Ms. Sankadota was seriously injured. Mr. Leonard was charged with two counts of second degree murder and one count of assault resulting in serious bodily injury, in violation of
United States v. Waldrooppublic domain
LUCERO, Circuit Judge. Garland Lee Waldroop II, having been convicted of bank fraud and conspiracy to commit bank fraud, appeals his convictions on the basis of insufficient evidence. He also argues that his sentence was imper-missibly enhanced based on judge-found facts in violation of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005
United States v. Lottpublic domain
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. I. Introduction Defendant-Appellant Johnny Lott was convicted in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma of offenses involving the manufacture and distribution of methamphetamine and sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment. Lott filed several motions to substitute counsel during the sentencing phase of