Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. McGillis”
In Re McGillispublic domain
370 B.R. 720 (2007) In re Mark Ervin McGILLIS and Donna Mae McGillis, Debtors. No. HG 06 02982. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan. May 15, 2007. *721 *722 Rebecca L. Johnson, Esq., Grand Rapids, for Debtors. Carol S. Chase, Esq., Kalamazoo, for the Chapter 13 Trustee. Donald
Tolliver v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT RONALD B. LEIGHTON, District Judge. On March 17, 2007, a group of teenagers spent an evening drinking and socializing at a home on the Lower Elwha Indian Reservation. In the early morning hours, seven of the revelers piled into a car to head home. Two — Ronald Scroggins and Vanna Francis — would never arrive. Plaintiffs are the parents and estates of the two deceased teenagers
United States v. Garcia-Cruzpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Tereso Garcia-Cruz appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 68-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Garcia-Cruz’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to
United States v. Diaz-Hernandezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM *** *706Jose Diaz-Hernandez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Diaz-Hernandez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, al
United States v. Hoffmanpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Jeremy Wayne Hoffman appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and sentence of life imprisonment for second-degree murder in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1111 and 1153. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Hoffman’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel
United States v. Hoffmanpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Jeremy Wayne Hoffman appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and sentence of life imprisonment for second-degree murder in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1111 and 1153. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Hoffman’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel
United States Capitol Police v. Office of Compliancepublic domain
CHEN, Circuit Judge. The United States Capitol Police (USCP) petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Directors of the Office of Compliance (Board) affirming the Hearing Officer’s finding that the USCP engaged in unfair labor practices when it issued Officer James Konczos a Command Discipline Warning in response to Officer Konczos’s protec
United States v. Gonzalez-Moralespublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Ricardo Gonzalez-Morales appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 38-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 *478S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Gonzalez-Morales’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, a
Opinion by JUDGE GRAHAM T1 Defendants, First Interstate Financial Utah LLC, First Interstate Financial LLP, and Paul Thurston (collectively, FIF), appeal the judgment entered on a jury verdict awarding plaintiff, McCillis Investment Company, LLP (MIC), $1,300,625 and fee simple ownership. of sixty-three acres of property located in Kersey, Colorado. We affi
Colorado Court of Appeals Opinions || August 13, 2015 Colorado Court of Appeals -- August 13, 2015 2015 COA 116. No. 14CA1568. McGillis Investment Company, LLP v. First Interstate Financial Utah LLC. Â COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2015 COA 116
Roney v. United Statespublic domain
790 F.Supp. 23 (1992) Wallace RONEY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 90-2813-LFO. United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 15, 1992. *24 Thomas A. Woodley, Gregory K. McGillivary, Mulholland & Hickey, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. Charles Flynn, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washi
United States v. Mahlerpublic domain
ROLPH, Judge: A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted the appellant, contrary to Ms pleas, of assault consummated by a battery upon Kade MaMer, Ms 17-day-old son by burning him on the back with a hot object, and of murdering Ms son by engaging in inherently dangerous acts (forcefully shaking and strikmg Ms son with Ms hands), in violation of Articles 128 and
United States v. Islippublic domain
18 F.Supp.2d 1047 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. David ISLIP; Gerald Brown; Streamflo Strainers, Inc.; Great Lakes Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.; Washington International Insurance Company; and International Cargo and Surety Insurance Company, Defendants. Slip Op. 98-125. Court No. 97-02-00357. United States Court of International Trade. August 26, 1998.
United States v. Hughespublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT GAMBOA, Judge: The appellant was convicted by a general court-martial consisting of members, contrary to his pleas, of committing indecent acts on two females under the age of 16 by *707fondling them and placing his hands on their private parts with intent to gratify his sexual desires. Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1994)
United States v. Ginnpublic domain
Opinion of the Court . SULLIVAN, Judge: On February 3, 1993, appellant was tried by a military judge sitting alone as a general court-martial at Fort Clayton, Panama. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of wrongful disposition of military property, sodomy, committing indecent acts with children (3 specifications), and taking indecent liberties with a child, in violation of Articles 108,
Western Air Line Construction Co. v. McGillispublic domain
127 U.S. 776 (1888) WESTERN AIR LINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. McGILLIS. No. 1283. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted April 9, 1888. Decided April 16, 1888. ORIGINAL MOTION IN A CAUSE BROUGHT HERE BY WRIT OF ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. *777 Mr. Jo
United States v. Johnsonpublic domain
Opinion of the Court COX, Judge: 1. Appellant was tried by a special courts martial, military judge sitting alone. He was charged with failing to obey a general order by possessing a pistol and ammunition, as well as a knife, in the barracks; and by allowing his wife to stay in the barracks with him, in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 892. At arraignment, he
United States v. Lewispublic domain
Opinion of the Court GIERKE, Judge: 1. A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of conspiracy to distribute cocaine and wrongfully distributing cocaine (2 specifications), in violation of Articles 81 and 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 881 and 912a, respectively. The approved sentence provides for a bad-conduct discharge, con
United States v. Inghampublic domain
Opinion of the Court COX, Judge: 1. Appellant was tried by general court-martial composed of officer members in Kaiserslautern, Federal Republic of Germany. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of willfully disobeying an order from a superior commissioned officer and breaking arrest (2 specifications), in violation of Articles 90 and 95, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 890 and 89
United States v. Jonespublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT RUSSELL, Judge: A military judge, sitting as a general court-martial, convicted the appellant, contrary to his pleas, of three specifications of violating a lawful general regulation and one specification of obstructing justice, in violation of Articles 92 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 892 and 934 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The appellant was sentenced to a