Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. McMillan”
United States v. McMillanpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) ) Criminal No. 19-0082 (PLF) DEMETRIUS MCMILLAN, ) ) Defendant. ) ___
United States v. McMillanpublic domain
OPINION Mark R. Hornak, United "States District Judge Pending before this Court is Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence, ECF No. 21. For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s Motion is. denied in part and granted in part. L BACKGROUND On March 8, 2016, the Defendant was charged with possession of a firearm and/or ammunition by a convicted felon, possession with in
United States v. McMillanpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Richard Tyrone McMillan seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006).
United States v. McMillanpublic domain
600 F.3d 434 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. Robert McMILLAN; Barry S. Scheur, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. No. 08-31148. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. March 11, 2010. *440 Gaven Dall Kammer, Asst. U.S. Atty., New Orleans, LA, Vijay Shanker (argued), Dept. of Just
United States v. McMillanpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Quintín O’Dell McMillan seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir.2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a c
United States v. McMillanpublic domain
DORMAN, Chief Judge: The appellant was tried before a special court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members. Contrary to his pleas, the members convicted the appellant of conspiracy to use methylenedioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy), making a false official statement, the divers use of ecstasy, and wrongfully appropriating 18 rounds of rifle ammunition. The appellant stands convicted of violating Articles 81,107,112a,
United States v. McMillanpublic domain
MEMORANDUM * McMillan appeals from his sentence. The district court had jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3231. We have jurisdiction of this timely filed appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. McMillan argues that his sentence must be vacated because neither he nor his counsel received an addendum to the presentence report prior to sentenci
United States v. McMillanpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER WINGATE, District Judge. This case is before the court pursuant to the motion of the United States to find the defendant Charles Roy McMillan (hereinafter “McMillan”) in contempt of a Consent Decree dated June 27, 1996, wherein McMillan agreed to refrain from “[u]sing force or threats of force to interfere with or intimidate employees or patients of the Jackson Women’
United States v. McMillanpublic domain
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge. Robert W. McMillan appeals from the denial of the government’s Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) 1 motion to reduce his fines in two cases. McMillan was charged in the Eastern District of Louisiana (Case No. 92-CR-154) with one count of engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise in violation of 21
United States v. McMillanpublic domain
914 F.Supp. 1387 (1996) UNITED STATES of America v. Kenneth McMILLAN. Criminal A. No. CR 95-090. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. February 15, 1996. *1388 Birch Pedigo McDonough, Ronald Tanet, Esq., New Orleans, LA, for Kenneth J. McMillan. Bernard E. Burk, Bernard E. Burk, New Orleans, LA, for John B. McMilla
United States v. McMillanpublic domain
92 F.3d 1199 U.S.v.McMillan* NO. 95-4698 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. July 18, 1996 1 Appeal From: S.D.Fla., No. 94-06188-CR-KLR 2
United States v. McMillanpublic domain
946 F.Supp. 1254 (1995) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Charles Roy McMILLAN and John Doe, Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:95-cv-633WS. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. November 22, 1995. *1255 *1256 Mitzi Dease Paige, U.S. Attorney's Office, Jackson, MS
United States v. McMillanpublic domain
2 F.3d 405 U.S.v.McMillan* NO. 92-6719 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Aug 20, 1993 1 Appeal From: S.D.Ala. 2
United States v. McMillanpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM:* In accordance with his plea, the appellant was found guilty by a military judge sitting as a special court-martial of wrongful use of “crack” cocaine in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 912a (Supp. IV 1986). He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for two months, forfeiture of $350.00 pa
United States v. McMillanpublic domain
900 F.2d 265 U.S.v.McMillan* NO. 89-3657 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. MAR 14, 1990 1 Appeal From: M.D.Fla. 2
McMillan v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
United States v. Ryan William McMillanpublic domain
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Ryan William McMillan pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court sentenced him to 84 months imprisonment based in part on its determination that his prior conviction for third degree riot was a crime of violence under the sentencing guidelines. McMillan appeals, and we vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing.
United States v. McMillanpublic domain
716 F.2d 898 13 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1953 U. S.v.McMillan 82-5349 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fourth Circuit 8/10/83 1 W.D.N.C. AFFIRMED
McMillan v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Same case below, 421 Fed. Appx. 361.
McMillan v. United Statespublic domain
'§§rz UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FoR THE Drsrmcr oF CoLUMBIA \QV 1 b 'Zl)ll gm u.-§¢ 91 ° 3 James F. Mcl\/Iillan, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. g C1v1l Act1on No. »` y ; United States of America, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM OPH\IION This action, brought pro se, is before the Court on the petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, accompanied by an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss the case