Cases

CCA 20160303 DAILY JOURNAL Interlocutory Orders Appellant’s motion to attach is granted.

CCA 20160303 DAILY JOURNAL Petitions for Grant of Review Denied

ORDER Thurman McClain was sentenced in 2003 to 192 months’ imprisonment as an Armed Career Criminal, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(e). He completed that prison term in 2012 and commenced what initially was a 5-year term of supervised release, but twice he has been sent back to prison after violating conditions of his release. McClain presently is serving a 4-year term of reimprisonment imposed in 2013, which is expected to end in Ma

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before F.D. MITCHELL, M.K. JAMISON, J.P. LISIECKI Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BRANDON M. MCCLAIN GAS TURBINE SYSTEMS TECHNICIAN FIREMAN RECRUIT (E-1), U.S. NAVY

CCA 20090446. On consideration of Appellee’s motion to request expedited oral argument, it is ordered that said motion is hereby granted, and that the above-entitled action be called for hearing on the 12th day of March, 2012.

CCA 20090446. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file a brief granted, up to and including January 27, 2012, and absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extension of time will be granted in this case.

PER CURIAM: Specialist Matthew J. McClain pleaded not guilty at a general court-martial to one specification of possessing child pornography and one specification of distributing child pornography, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 934 (2006). A military judge found McClain guilty of both specifications and sentenced him to reducti

CCA 20090446. Review granted on the following issue: WHETHER THE EVIDENCE IS LEGALLY SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT APPELLANT’S CONVICTION OF POSSESSING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY. Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

CCA 20090446. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to November 2, 2011.

*757ORDER David McClain was convicted of possession of a firearm by a felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and sentenced to 95 months’ imprisonment and three years’ supervised release. He was released from prison and commenced the term of supervised release in September 2007, but soon he was using cocaine and marijuana and in early 2008 his probation officer petitioned for revocation. A

*757ORDER David McClain was convicted of possession of a firearm by a felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and sentenced to 95 months’ imprisonment and three years’ supervised release. He was released from prison and commenced the term of supervised release in September 2007, but soon he was using cocaine and marijuana and in early 2008 his probation officer petitioned for revocation. A

PER CURIAM: Anthony McClain appeals the district court’s order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000), seeking a re*219duction to his sentence based on an amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See U

MEMORANDUM *** Willie R. McClain appeals the district court’s judgment on a jury verdict finding him guilty of knowingly and unlawfully possessing with the intent to distribute 50 grams or more of a substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine base, and of knowingly and intentionally possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 06a0115p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, - UNITED STATES OF

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 05a0463p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

PER CURIAM: Anthony McClain seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his motion as having been filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) and denying the motion as successive. We find the court correctly construed the motion as having been filed under § 2255. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c

SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Robert Martins and Antonio Guastella appeal from a judgment of conviction entered on February 11, 2002, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Scheindlin, J.), following a jury trial. Both defendants were convicted of money laundering, multiple counts of wire fraud, and interstate transportation of stolen property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§

Defendants-appellants Robert Martins and Antonio Guastella appeal from a judgment of conviction entered on February 11, 2002, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Scheindlin, J.), following a jury trial. Both defendants were convicted of money laundering, multiple counts of wire fraud, and interstate transportation of stolen property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1957, 1343, and 2314, respectively, as well as conspira

377 F.3d 219 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Michael McCLAIN, also known as "Michael MacClane"; Marianne Curtis; Louis Frechette; Roy Thornton, Defendants,Robert Martins, also known as "R. Martins", also known as "R Martin", Antonio Guastella, also known as Nino Anthony Guastella, also known as Anthony Costelli, Defendants-Appellants. No. 02-1093(L). No. 02-1122(CON).

PER CURIAM. Ernest Allen McClain seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken to this court from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a state court unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When,