Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Mejia-Sanchez”
United States v. Mejia-Sanchezpublic domain
PER CURIAM.* Justo Mejia-Sanchez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Mejia-Sanchez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offen
Mejia-Sanchez v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan MEJIA-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellantpublic domain
MAGILL, Senior Circuit Judge: Juan Mejia-Sanchez violated a condition of his supervised release, and a probation officer submitted a violation report and petition on supervised release to the district court. Mejia-Sanchez moved to dismiss the petition. The district court denied the motion and sentenced Mejia-Sanchez to one month imprisonment for violating a condition of his su
United States v. Yepizpublic domain
ORDER The opinion and partial dissent filed December 20, 2016, arid' appearing at 844 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir. 2016), are withdrawn. The opinion may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit. A concurrently issued amended memorandum disposition ' addresses all of the issues before the court. Pursuant to the court’s May 31, 2017 order (No.
PIERCE, Senior Circuit Judge: Omaira Gomez-Galvis appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Peter K. Leisure, Judge, after a jury trial, in which she was found guilty of conspiring to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, conspiring to import cocaine in v
United States v. Yepizpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 07-50051 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-05-00578- JFW-7 MANUEL YEPIZ, AKA Martin Sanchez, Seal G and Pony; Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 07-50062 Plainti
Mejia-Gonzalez v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Berger v. United Statespublic domain
*1101C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 980; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 374 F. 3d 1023; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 982; C. A. D. C. Cir. Reported below: 395 F. 3d 452; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 112 Fed. Appx. 481;
Berger v. United Statespublic domain
*1101C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 980; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 374 F. 3d 1023; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 982; C. A. D. C. Cir. Reported below: 395 F. 3d 452; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 112 Fed. Appx. 481;
Smith v. United Statespublic domain
*1180C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 100 Fed. Appx. 524; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 247; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 104 Fed. Appx. 436; C. A. 8th Cir. Reported below: 367 F. 3d 805; *1181No. 04-7844. No
United States v. Guevarapublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED. Defendant Tranquilinia LeguizamonDiaz (“Defendant”), a Paraguayan national, was convicted after a jury trial of bribery of a public official and conspiracy to bribe a public official, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 201(b)(1)(A), 2, 371. The district court (McAvoy, J.) sentenced Def
United States v. Guevarapublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and hereby is AFFIRMED. Defendant-appellant Maria Rosalba Guevara appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (McAvoy, /.), convicting her, following a jury trial, of, inter alia, conspiring to distribute and possess with inte
United States v. Andinopublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgments of August 7, 2000, August 8, 2000, and January 29, 2001, be, and they hereby are, AFFIRMED. The defendants Florentino Sanchez, Lenny Siri (“L.Siri”), Dionicio Siri (“D.Siri”), Pedro Mejia, and Jesus Eymar Moneada appeal judgments and sentences imposed by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New
Limas-Hidrogo v. United Statespublic domain
(Reported below: 101 Fed. Appx. 516); (101 Fed. Appx. 466); (101 Fed. Appx. 513); (101 Fed. Appx. 458); (101 Fed. Appx. 511); (101 Fed. Appx. 451); (101 Fed. Appx. 541); (101 Fed. Appx. 520); (101 Fed. Appx. 496); (101 Fed. Appx. 463); (101 Fed. Appx. 489); (101 Fed. Appx. 4
United States v. Castropublic domain
175 F.Supp.2d 129 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. [05] Martires Paulino CASTRO, [08] Esteban Martinez García, [23] Carlos Valdes, Defendants Criminal No. 00-0693(PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 14, 2001. *130 Miriam R. Ramos-Grateroles, San Juan, for Rafael Reynoso-De-La-Cruz. Marl
Membrano-Acosta v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Membrano-Acosta v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Pena-Reyes v. United Statespublic domain
*982(Reported below: 87 Fed. Appx. 930); (85 Fed. Appx. 363); (83 Fed. Appx. 620); (85 Fed. Appx. 367); (82 Fed. Appx. 901); (83 Fed. Appx. 622); (82 Fed. Appx. 902); (83 Fed. Appx. 623); (82 Fed. Appx. 908); (82 Fed. Appx. 904); (83 F
Pena-Reyes v. United Statespublic domain
*982(Reported below: 87 Fed. Appx. 930); (85 Fed. Appx. 363); (83 Fed. Appx. 620); (85 Fed. Appx. 367); (82 Fed. Appx. 901); (83 Fed. Appx. 622); (82 Fed. Appx. 902); (83 Fed. Appx. 623); (82 Fed. Appx. 908); (82 Fed. Appx. 904); (83 F
Chigozie Iwouha v. United Statespublic domain
(Reported below: 71 Fed. Appx. 384); (72 Fed. Appx. 957); (71 Fed. Appx. 437); (72 Fed. Appx. 971); (72 Fed. Appx. 962); (74 Fed. Appx. 357); (73 Fed. Appx. 75); (71 Fed. Appx. 397); (72 Fed. Appx. 955); (72 Fed. Appx. 961); (72 Fed. Appx. 960); (72 Fed. Appx. 954);