Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Mendez-Rueda”
United States v. Ruslan Kirilyukpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-10447 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:14-cr-00083-JAM-4 RUSLAN KIRILYUK, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Cali
United States v. Ruslan Kirilyukpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-10447 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:14-cr-00083-JAM-4 RUSLAN KIRILYUK, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Cali
Yisra'el Nation v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER EMILY C. HEWITT, Chief Judge. Before the court is plaintiffs Complaint and Tort Claim for The Yisra’el Nation, (plaintiffs Complaint or Compl.), filed by The Yisra’el Nation (plaintiff), pro se, on June 16, 2011. Compl., Docket Number 1, at 1. The Complaint identifies Keith Edward Living-way (Mr. Livingway) as the Secretary of State for The Yisra’el Nation. Compl., Copyrighted Declaration
United States v. Smithpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 03-4829 TERRANCE SMITH, a/k/a Ty, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
United States v. Guillen-Alvarezpublic domain
PRADO, Circuit Judge: Alfredo Antonio Guillen-AIvarez (“Alvarez”) appeals the sentence imposed by the district court after his plea of guilty to illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM the sentence imposed by the district court. I.FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
United States v. Weilandpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 04-30091 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No. CR-03-00070-EFS WILLIAM WEILAND, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court
United States v. Morales-Martinezpublic domain
496 F.3d 356 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto MORALES-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-40467. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. August 8, 2007. Mark Michael Dowd, Brownsville, TX, James Lee Turner, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, TX, for U.S. Marjorie A. Meyers, Fed. Pub. Def., Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Asst. Fed. Pub
United States v. Gonzalez-Ramirezpublic domain
*311 OWEN, Circuit Judge: The defendant contends that a conviction for attempted kidnapping under Tennessee law is not a “crime of violence” for purposes of section 2L1.2 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Because Tennessee’s statutory definition of kidnapping falls within the generic, contempora
United States v. Valdez-Maltospublic domain
PER CURIAM: Aurelio Valdez-Maltos (Valdez) was convicted after a jury trial of being found unlawfully present in United States follow *911 ing deportation, and he was sentenced to 77 months of imprisonment, three years of supervised release, and a $100
United States v. William Weilandpublic domain
GOULD, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellant William Weiland appeals his conviction and sentence for one count of possessing two firearms and ammunition as a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and one count of forfeiture, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c). Weiland argues: 1) that Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(b) requires suppression of the firearms and ammunition seized during
Pareja v. Attorney General of the United Statespublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. Blanca Bárrales Pareja, a Mexican citizen and native, petitions for review of a final order of removal of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). We will grant the petition in part, deny it in part, and dismiss it in part and remand this case to the BIA with instructions. I.
441 F.3d 254 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Terrance SMITH, a/k/a Ty, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Rodney Reep, a/k/a Dirty Harry, a/k/a Harry, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Karl E. Moore, Sr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 03-4829. No. 03-4878. No. 04-411
Maymo-Melendez v. Alvarez-Ramirezpublic domain
373 F.3d 1 Jorge J. MAYMO-MELENDEZ, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.Julio ALVAREZ-RAMIREZ; Ricardo Pacheco-Pacheco; Irba Cruz-De-Batista, Defendants, Appellants,Jane Doe 02CV2001; Conjugal Partnership Alvarez-Doe; Jane Doe 02CV2001-2; Conjugal Partnership Pacheco-Doe; John Doe 02CV2001; Conjugal Partnership Doe-Cruz; Conjugal Partnership Alves-Doe; Juan Alves-Rueda, Defendants. No. 03-1141. Unite
De La Vega v. Gonzalespublic domain
JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge. We write to address whether this Court has jurisdiction to review a denial by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) of a petitioner’s request for cancellation of removal on the basis of its finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate that his removal would cause “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” to a qualifying U.S. citizen relative. Because we hold that such denials are dis
Avtar Singh v. Jeffrey Rosenpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0005p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT AVTAR SINGH, ┐ Petitioner, │ │
De La Vega v. Gonzalespublic domain
436 F.3d 141 Gustavo A. DE LA VEGA, Petitioner,v.Alberto R. GONZALES,* Attorney General of the United States, Edward McElroy, New York District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondents. Docket No. 03-40164. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: September 14, 2005. Decided: January 27, 2006.
Buenaver v. Vasquezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WEXLER, District Judge: Petitioner German Mussini Buenaver (“Petitioner” or “Father”) brings this action pursuant to the International Child Abduction Remedies Act, 42 U.S.C. § 11601-11 (1998) (“ICARA”), which implements The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“the Hague Convention” or “Convention”). The action is brought against Maria Mu
FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge, Dissenting: These cases involve aliens who came to our country illegally, were discovered, and who were accorded the procedural and due *1054process rights we offer before they were deported. Nothing deterred, and with nothing if not disdain for our laws, they almost immediately reentered illegally.1
Costa-Urena v. Segarrapublic domain
PER CURIAM. This is an interlocutory appeal of the denial of a motion for summary judgment brought by two defendants to a political discrimination lawsuit. One of the appellants is Aníbal Acevedo Vilá, the Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Acevedo Vilá is a substitute defendant to an official capacity claim for prospective injunctive relief initially lodged against his p
Daniel Campbell v. City of Los Angelespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,