Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Mendoza-Parra”
Mendoza-De La Parra v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mendoza-De La Parra v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Barnes v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Barnes v. United Statespublic domain
LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On
Garza-Hernandez v. United Statespublic domain
539 U.S. 953 Garza-Hernandezv.United States.Perez-Huertav.United StatesZapata-Martinezv.United StatesSolis-Brionesv.United StatesCarbajal-Taglev.United StatesMartinez-Rodriguezv.United StatesSalinas-Rodriguezv.United StatesCortes-Gallegosv.United StatesMendoza-Martinezv.United StatesHernandez-Hernandezv.United StatesGonzalez-Medra
Garza-Hernandez v. United Statespublic domain
(Reported below: 61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (67 Fed. Appx. 243);
Garza-Hernandez v. United Statespublic domain
(Reported below: 61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (67 Fed. Appx. 243);
United States v. Adamspublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. No. 21-cr-212-ZMF JARED HUNTER ADAMS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Courts must be especially vigilant in protecting indigent defendants’ right to a fair trial. This includes the provision of travel, shelter, and food
United States v. Parrapublic domain
Case: 23-50487 Document: 102-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/05/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-50487 ____________
United States v. Gaytanpublic domain
649 F.3d 573 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth GAYTAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-3601. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued November 29, 2010. Decided August 12, 2011. *574 Maureen E. Merin, (argued). Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, f
United States v. MacIaspublic domain
658 F.3d 509 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert MACIAS, Jr., also known as Robert Macias, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-50614. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. September 27, 2011. Revised October 17, 2011. *511 Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), San Antonio, TX,
United States v. MacIaspublic domain
E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: Robert Macias, Jr. appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress a firearm uncovered during a warrantless automobile search by a Texas Department of Public Safety officer on Interstate 10 near Pecos County, Texas. The firearm found in the search of the truck Macias was driving is at the bottom of Macias’s conviction for being a felon
United States v. Jesus Valdez-Novoapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-50336 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:11-cr-00872-JAH-1 JESUS VALDEZ-NOVOA, Defendant-Appellant. ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION Appeal from the United States District Cou
United States v. Mendozapublic domain
ORDER A jury found Antonio Mendoza guilty of conspiracy to possess and distribute methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and possession with intent to distribute, id. *114§ 841(a)(1). The district court sentenced him to life imprisonment, the mandatory minimum sentence given the quantity of drugs and Mendoza’s prior felony drug convictions. See id. § 84
United States v. Mendozapublic domain
ORDER A jury found Antonio Mendoza guilty of conspiracy to possess and distribute methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1), and possession with intent to distribute, id. *114§ 841(a)(1). The district court sentenced him to life imprisonment, the mandatory minimum sentence given the quantity of drugs and Mendoza’s prior felony drug convictions. See id. § 84
United States v. Jesus Valdez-Novoapublic domain
Opinion by Judge BYBEE; Dissent by Judge McKEOWN. OPINION BYBEE, Circuit Judge: - Jesus Valdez-Novoa, a native and citizen of Mexico, appeals his conviction for attempting to enter the United States without consent after having been previously removed in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm. Valdez-Novoa entered t
United States v. Jesus Valdez-Novoapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-50336 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:11-cr-00872-JAH-1 JESUS VALDEZ-NOVOA, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California John A. Houston, District Judge,
United States v. Irbypublic domain
558 F.3d 651 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DeMarco IRBY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-1307. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued December 3, 2008. Decided March 11, 2009. *652 K. Tate Chambers, Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Peoria, IL, Joseph H. Hartzl
United States v. Poepublic domain
556 F.3d 1113 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aaron Dale POE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-6237. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. March 3, 2009. *1117 William P. Earley, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender Office, Oklahoma City, OK, for the Defendant-Appellant. Ch
United States v. Gonzalezpublic domain
534 F.3d 613 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Carlos GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-3248. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued May 8, 2008. Decided July 15, 2008. *614 Marny Zimmer (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appe