Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Mohamed”
United States v. Mohamed Ahmedpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-2716 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Mohamed Gamar Ahmed
United States v. Mohamed Saidpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 21-7089 Doc: 43 Filed: 02/23/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-7089 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MOHAMED ALI SAID, a/k/a Maxamad Cali Saciid,
United States v. Mohamed Tourepublic domain
Case: 19-10505 Document: 00515484144 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/10/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 19-10505 FILED
United States v. Mohamed Saidpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-7089 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MOHAMED ALI SAID, a/k/a Maxamad Cali Saciid, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, Distr
United States v. Mohamedpublic domain
BARRON, Circuit Judge, dissenting. *107Once again, we confront a challenge to the application of a federal sentencing enhancement to a defendant's prior state law conviction. Once again, we must try to divine whether the conviction triggers the enhancement. We have confronted this issue many times in the context of crimes of violence. We do so
United States v. Mohamed Belakhdharpublic domain
COOK, Circuit Judge. After observing Mohamed Belakhdhar driving in tandem with a car suspected of *926 transporting heroin from Chicago to Detroit, Drug Enforcement Administration agents directed local police to stop his car. That stop ultimately led investigators to discover two kilogra
United States v. Mohamed Motonpublic domain
Case: 18-40884 Document: 00515328217 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/02/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-40884 March 2, 2020
United States v. Mohamedpublic domain
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Mohamed Seid Ahmed Mohamed pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and to traffic in contraband cigarettes, On appeal, he seeks to vacate his sentence of 41 months imprisonment, asserting that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion to compel production of favorable information and in
United States v. Mohamedpublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, United States District Judge Mr. Alhassane Ould Mohamed' (“Defendant”) was indicted for Murder of an Internationally Protected Person and Attempted Murder of an Internationally Protected Person. On October 29, 2015, the Court scheduled a five-day suppression hearing to begin on January 25, 2016. On January 6, 2016, the Defendant gave notice’ to the Government of it
United States v. Mohamedpublic domain
*18 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, United States District Judge On March 24,2016, the Court accepted the guilty plea of Defendant Alhassane Ould Moharaed, also known as “Cheibani,” (“Defendant”) to a superseding information pursuant a plea agreement under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C). Plea Hearing, ECF No. 151. The
United States v. Mohamed Farahpublic domain
GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. Appellants Mohamed Farah, Abdirahman Daud, and Guled Omar were convicted of several federal offenses related to their participation in a conspiracy to join the foreign terrorist organization known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant ("ISIL"). They now appeal their convictions for conspiracy to commit murder abroad, see
United States v. Mohamed Farahpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-4363 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Mohamed Abdihamid Farah lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ___________________________ No. 16-4364 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff
United States v. Mohamedpublic domain
DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, United States District Judge On September 13, 2013, Alhassane Ould Mohamed (“Defendant”) was indicted for one count of Murder of an Internationally Protected Person and one count of Attempted Murder of an Internationally Protected Person. Dkt. .1 (“Indictment”). On June 19, 2015, Defendant filed an omnibus motion to (1) dismiss the charge of Attempted Murder of an
United States v. Mohamedpublic domain
WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, District Judge: Alhassane Ould Mohamed (“Defendant”), also known as “Cheibani,” was indicted on September 13, 2013 for one count of murder of an internationally protected person and one count of attempted murder of an internationally protected person. Dkt. 1 (“Indictment”). Defendant was arrested in Mali on November 25, 2013 and has been detained in the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan, New
United States v. Mohamed Mohamudpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-30217 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:10-cr-00475-KI-1 MOHAMED OSMAN MOHAMUD, Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Garr M. King, District Judge, Presidin
United States v. Mohamed Mohamudpublic domain
OPINION OWENS, Circuit Judge: Mohamed Osman Mohamud appeals from his conviction for attempting to detonate a large bomb during the annual Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremony in Pioneer. Courthouse Square in downtown Portland, Oregon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332a(a)(2)(A). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
United States v. Mohamed Fadigapublic domain
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. A jury found Mohamed Fadiga guilty of possessing more than 15 unauthorized “access devices”—gift cards that had been fraudulently reencoded—and a judge sentenced him to 30 months’ imprisonment. See 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(3). He contends that police learned about the crime by violating the Fourth Amendment and that the jury pool was the result of racial
United States v. Mohamed Saidpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-4413 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MOHAMED ALI SAID, a/k/a Mohammed Said, a/k/a Maxamad Cali Saciid; MOHAMED ABDI JAMA, a/k/a Mohammed Abdi Jamah; ABDICASIIS CABAASE; ABDI RAZAQ ABSHIR OSMAN, a/k/a Abdirasaq Abshir; MOHAMED FARAH, a/k/a Mahamed Farraah Hassan,
United States v. Mohamedpublic domain
630 F.3d 1 (2010) UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Omar MOHAMED, Defendant, Appellant. No. 09-1637. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard November 1, 2010. Decided December 9, 2010. *2 Elizabeth Prevett for appellant. Mark T. Quinlivan, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Carmen M. Ortiz,
United States v. Mohamedpublic domain
600 F.3d 1000 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Elias MOHAMED, Appellant. No. 09-2349. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: January 15, 2010. Filed: April 13, 2010. *1002 Robert D. Lewis, Davis, Lewis & Associates, Springfield, MO, argued, for appellant. Randall D. Egg