Cases

ORDER AMENDING The memorandum disposition filed January 8, 2016 in the above-captioned case is •hereby amended as follows: The sentence that currently reads, <Vil-lasensor’s testimony that she was going to pay a fee to be smuggled into the United States was admissible under Rule 602 because her earlier testimony that she had worked with another individual on the details of being smuggled into the United States e

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ronnie Molina has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Molina has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of t

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eulalio Molina has moved for *419leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Molina has not filed a response.

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Molina-Castillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Molina-Castillo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the releva

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jose Armando Molina-Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Molina-Flores has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Antonio Molina-Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Molina-Gonzalez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relev

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS PHILIP R. MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On this day, the .Court considered Defendant Maria Isabel Molina-Isidoro’s (“Molina") “Motion to Suppress and Memorandum in Support” (ECF No. 16) [hereinafter .“Motion”], filed on September 2, 2016; the United States’ (the “Government”) “Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Suppress” (ECF No. 17) [hereinafter “Respon

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Antonio De Jesus Molina-Ortega has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Molina-Ortega has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Jorge L. Molina-Gómez (“Molina”) appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to suppress both the heroin discovered in hidden compartments of his laptop computer and Sony Playstation game con *16 sole and some of the statements he made to United States Customs and Bo

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Manuel Molina-Alonso has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 *374L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Molina-Alonso has filed

FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT CONFIRMING FORFEITURE FRANK D. WHITNEY, Chief Judge. BACKGROUND On February 12, 2013, this Court entered a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853 and Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(d)(2), based upon the Defendant’s plea of guilty to Counts One and Two in the Bill of Indictment and evidence already on record, as well as Defendant’s consent to forfeiture i

MEMORANDUM *** William Molina-Ochoa appeals from the judgment revoking supervised release and the 21-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Molina-Ochoa’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Molina-Ochoa th

OPINION OF THE COURT RENDELL, Circuit Judge. Kevin Ortega and Edwin Molina are co-defendants who pled guilty to conspiring to distribute cocaine base. On appeal, Ortega challenges the District Court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea and Molina challenges the District Court’s calculation of his sentencing guidelines. In the middle of their trial, both Ortega and Molina entered into plea ag

OPINION OF THE COURT RENDELL, Circuit Judge. Kevin Ortega and Edwin Molina are co-defendants who pled guilty to conspiring to distribute cocaine base. On appeal, Ortega challenges the District Court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea and Molina challenges the District Court’s calculation of his sentencing guidelines. In the middle of their trial, both Ortega and Molina entered into plea ag

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Fidel Molina-Avendano (Molina) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Molina has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the releva

McGUIRE, Judge: Appellant was tried by special court-martial, military judge alone. Pursuant to his pleas of guilty, entered in accordance with a pretrial agreement, Appellant was convicted of one specification of wrongfully engaging in sexually intimate behavior aboard a Coast Guard vessel, in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 892; two specifications of maltreating a person subject

596 F.3d 1166 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus Antonio MOLINA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-10066. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted January 15, 2010. Filed March 8, 2010. *1167 S. Jonathan Young, Williamson & Young, P.C., Tucson, AZ, for the appel

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jose Delfino Molina-Juarez (Molina) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Molina-Juarez has filed a response. The record is insufficiently devel

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Fidel Molina-Avendana has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Molina-Avendana has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the releva

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Washington, D.C. UNITED STATES v. Rene A. MOLINA, Boatswain’s Mate Second Class (E-5), U.S. Coast Guard CGCMS 24387 Docket No. 1299 September