Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Molina-Gonzalez”
United States v. Molina-Gonzalezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Antonio Molina-Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Molina-Gonzalez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relev
United States v. Molina-Gonzalezpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * AFFIRMED. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Gonzalez-Molina v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Same case below, 409 Fed. Appx. 751.
Gonzalez-Molina v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Gonzalez-Molinapublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Jaime Gonzalez-Molina appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of unlawful reentry by a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Gonzalez-Molina contends that in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), the district court improperly imposed a sentence in excess of § 1326(a)’s two-year maximum based on
United States v. Miguel Molina, A/K/A Juan Menchaca-Gonzalez, Roberto Ramirez-Perez, Miguel Molina-Casarezpublic domain
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS. HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge: Miguel Molina appeals from an enhanced sentence imposed upon him following his plea of guilty to a one-count indictment charging illegal entry into the United States. Based upon Molina’s criminal record, the District Court departed from the sentencing range of
Gonzalez-Fuentes v. Molinapublic domain
607 F.3d 864 (2010) Efraín GONZÁLEZ-FUENTES, et al., Petitioners, Appellees, v. Hon. Carlos MOLINA, Secretary of Corrections and Rehabilitation of Puerto Rico and Administrator of Corrections of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Respondent, Appellant. Carmen Rivera-Feliciano, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. Hon. Luis Fortuno Burset, Governor of Puerto Rico; Hon. Roberto Sanchez-Ramos, Secretary of Justice of the Commonwealth of Puert
United States v. Molina-Florespublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jose Armando Molina-Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Molina-Flores has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions
United States v. Martinezpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Defendants-Appellants Angel Cordero, Ian Burgess, Edgar Marino Sanchez, and Ricardo Delvi appeal from judgments of conviction entered against them by the District Court after a jury found them guilty of various offenses.1 On appeal, defendants-appellants challenge (1) the District Court’s admission of the redacted plea allocutions of three of their co-defendants; (2) the District Court’s fail
United States v. Martinezpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Defendants-Appellants Angel Cordero, Ian Burgess, Edgar Marino Sanchez, and Ricardo Delvi appeal from judgments of conviction entered against them by the District Court after a jury found them guilty of various offenses.1 On appeal, defendants-appellants challenge (1) the District Court’s admission of the redacted plea allocutions of three of their co-defendants; (2) the District Court’s fail
United States v. Castro-Coellopublic domain
474 F.Supp.2d 853 (2007) UNITED STATES of America v. Francisco CASTRO-COELLO. United States of America v. Jose Molina-Gonzalez. United States of America v. Rogelio Guevara-Barrera. United States of America v. Marlon Javier Cruz-Mendoza. United States of America v. Oscar Mauricio Pineda-Maldonado. United States of America v. Miguel Angel Portales-Navarro. Criminal Ac
Smith v. United Statespublic domain
*1180C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 100 Fed. Appx. 524; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 247; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 104 Fed. Appx. 436; C. A. 8th Cir. Reported below: 367 F. 3d 805; *1181No. 04-7844. No
United States v. De La Paz-Rentaspublic domain
613 F.3d 18 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Natanael DE LA PAZ-RENTAS, a/k/a Nato, Defendant, Appellant. *19 United States of America, Appellee, v. Victor Sanjurjo-Nunez, Defendant, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. Pedro Molina-Bonilla, Defendant, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. Waldemar Torres-Gonzalez, a/k/a Waldy, Defendan
Adams v. United Statespublic domain
MICHEL, Circuit Judge. This suit was brought by certain present and former United States Border Patrol agents, alleging that the government wrongly and willfully failed to pay the plaintiffs overtime wages at a time-and-a-half rate as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207(a). The government conceded that the plaintiffs had not been paid for overtime, but contended that all of the various position
Adams v. United Statespublic domain
350 F.3d 1216 Rowdy D. ADAMS, Ricardo E. Aguirre, Sheri L. Althoff, Luis R. Alvarado, Luis A. Amavizca, Paul H. Ammerman, Paul A. Anderson, Jaime M. Arras, Larry G. Arthurs, Larry H. Arthurs, Martha I. Arvizu, James R. Ash, David J. Astle, John T. Attanasio, Meri L. Axberg, Albert Bailey, Jr., Robert V. Bakowski, Donald L. Barley, John C. Bates, James W. Baumann, Paul A. Beeson, James S. Bendorf, David P. Bennett, Frank J. Beverly, William L. Black
Barnes v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Barnes v. United Statespublic domain
LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On
United States v. Cisnerospublic domain
Case: 23-40625 Document: 100-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/06/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 23-40625
United States v. Pirespublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1062 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee, v. ADMILSON PIRES, a/k/a Mikey, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Leo T. Sorokin, U.S. District Judge]
United States v. Skrmettipublic domain
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 605 U. S. Part 2 Pages 495–608 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 18, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are