Cases

ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________________ No. 23-1836 _______________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant v. REGINALD L. HOPKINS _______________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________________ No. 23-1836 _______________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant v. REGINALD L. HOPKINS _______________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle D

USCA4 Appeal: 20-4514 Doc: 75 Filed: 10/25/2022 Pg: 1 of 17 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-4514 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ENIL RAMON MONTOYA VELASQUEZ,

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-1693 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Ricardo Macias Saucedo, also known as Ricardo Macias Saseo, also known a

SELYA, Circuit Judge. It takes a certain degree of effrontery for an accused person held in pretrial detention to continue to conduct his criminal enterprise over a prison telephone, knowing that prisoner calls are customarily recorded. But defendant-appellant Mukon-kole Huge Kifwa did just that, relying on the masking effect of his use of a language (Lingala) seldom heard in the

538 F.3d 139 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Nelson GUEVARA-UMANA, also known as Nelson A. Guevara, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 07-1410-cr. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: 11, 2008. Decided: August 15, 2008. *140 Evan C. Williams, Assistant United States Attorney (Susan C

07-1410-cr United States v. Guevara-Umana UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ____________________________________ August Term, 2007 (Argued: June 11, 2008 Decided: August 15, 2008) Docket No. 07-1410-cr _________________________________

521 F.3d 437 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edwin Giovanni RODRIGUEZ-AMAYA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-4514. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: February 1, 2008. Decided: April 11, 2008. *438 Geremy Charles Kamens, Office Of the Federal Public Defender, Alexandria, V

PER CURIAM: Appellant Viterbo Hernandez, Jr. (“Hernandez”) appeals the district court’s denial of his federal habeas petition. In his petition, Hernandez argued, among other things, that the district court’s failure to warn him that his federal term of imprisonment would run consecutive to his anticipated state sentence rendered his federal guilty plea involuntary. We granted Hern

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge. In this bizarre case the jury found defendant-appellant guilty of all nine counts of an indictment charging him with possession of silencers, a machine gun, and various types of grenades which had not been registered in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record as required by Chapter 58, Tit

WISDOM, Circuit Judge, dissenting: In United States v. Almendarez, 5 Cir. 1976, 534 F.2d 648, 649-50, we found that a driver of an automobile may be considered as having constructive possession of whatever illegal substance the vehicle contains. See United States v. Riggins, 5 Cir. 1977, 563 F.2d 1264. Today, the majority extends that rule to

EDWIN F. HUNTER, Jr., District Judge: On September 16, 1988, the grand jury for the El Paso Division of the Western District of Texas returned a superseding indictment charging Audelio Arzola-Ama-ya (“Arzola-Amaya”) as a principal administrator, organizer, and the leader of a continuing criminal enterprise, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 848(b). In addition, all six Appellants, A

406 F.2d 228 Jose CAZARES-RAMIREZ and Jose Felix Nandin, Appellants,v.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 25010. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. January 7, 1969. Rehearing Denied February 28, 1969. Rehearing Denied March 20, 1969. Jeremiah Ingels Rh

180 F.3d 199 Luis Fernando ALVIDRES-REYES; Daniel Nunez; Rosana Diaz;Ricardo Flores; Jose Manuel Lopez; Juan Sedillo; MiguelAngel Perea; Julio Puentes; Jose Manuel Adame; Genaro Amaro;Armando Palomino; Vicente Chavez; Estela Hernandez; SandraCasado; Jesus Regalado; Eduardo Rubio; Roberto Vargas; JosePilar Morales; Arturo Martinez; Amelia Trujillo-Carmona;Esperanza Garcia; Francisca Medrano; Guadalupe Vasquez;Lilia Gonzal

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ORDERING PLAINTIFF RONALD MURRAY TO SHOW CAUSE WHY HIS CLAIM SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF ARTICLE III JURISDICTION William J. Martinez, United States District Judge This lawsuit began as a widespread challenge to many alleged wrongdoings committed by the State of Colorado against prisoners and probationers classified as sex offenders, as

DENNIS, Circuit Judge: The plaintiffs, fifty resident aliens, brought this suit for mandamus, declaratory, and injunctive relief in the district court seeking to compel the Attorney General of the United States (“Attorney General”) and the Immigration & Naturalization Service (“INS”) to consider their applications for suspension of deportation under a now-repealed provision of

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3134 ___________________________ Craig Lyons, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Justin Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Tommy Applegate, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Brandon Etzkorn, I

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS FILED BY DEFENDANTS NIEBLING AND VINING WILLIAM J. MARTÍNEZ, United States District Judge Plaintiff Richard Burns and his family members (“Plaintiffs”) bring this civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against multi-pie Defendants who are involved with the management and treatment of sex offenders in the state of Colorado, including Dr. Glenn E. Niebling and James Vining (“D