Cases

Case: 24-20088 Document: 48-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/09/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED December 9, 2024

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1669 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. EDGAR JOEL MORALES-ORTIZ, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Aida M. Delgado-Colón, U.S. District Judge] B

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1264 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ANDY G. MORALES-VÉLEZ, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]

Appellate Case: 22-4074 Document: 010110997681 Date Filed: 02/09/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 9, 2024

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 06-248-4 (JDB) JUAN DEL CID MORALES, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is defendant Juan Del Cid Morales’ motion for compassionate release and his motion for appointment of counsel. For the reasons set forth below,

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1523 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. NESTOR MORALES-CORTIJO, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Aida M. Delgado-Colón, U.S. District Judge] B

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 8, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert FOR THE TE

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 17-1181, 18-1047 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. WILLIAM NOEL MORALES-NEGRÓN, Defendant, Appellant. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Aida M. Delgado-Colón, U.S. District Judge]

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Gilberto Jesus Morales has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Morales has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s br

GORTON, J. *133Defendant Miguel Angel Morales Torres ("Morales Torres" or "defendant") has been indicted on one count of Possession with Intent to Distribute One Kilogram or More of Heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)

ROSANNA MALOUF PETERSON, United States District Judge BEFORE THE COURT is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 41. Defendant argues that his prior removal order was invalid and cannot be used to prove an element of a charge of illegal reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ERIC F. MELGREN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Juan Morales’ Motion to Suppress (Doc. 34). Morales contends that evidence of methamphetamine and cocaine obtained during a traffic stop should be suppressed because the stop was not justified at its inception and his consent to search was invalid because of an unreasonable detention. Specifically, Morales argue

HOWARD, Chief Judge. Juan Ángel Morales-Arroyo challenges the reasonableness of a 132-month prison sentence imposed for unlawful possession of firearms in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime and for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute. He contends that the waiver-of-appeal provision in his plea agreement does not bar this appeal. After careful consideration

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Peter Morales has moved for leave to with*172draw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Morales has not filed a response. We have reviewed

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before F.D. MITCHELL, J.R. MCFARLANE, M.C. HOLIFIELD Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ISMAEL MORALES PRIVATE (E-1), U.S. MARINE CORPS NMCCA 20140038

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Hector Ruben Morales-Cardenas raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Gonzalez-Longoria, 831 F.3d 670 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (Sept. 29, 2016) (No. 16-6259). In Gonzalez-Longoria, we held that 18 U.S.C. § 16(b), which defines a crime of violence when incorporated by refe

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alejandro Morales-Sigala has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Morales-Sigala has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the rel

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Alejandro Morales-Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Morales-Flores has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the rel

ORDER ROY B. DALTON, JR., District Judge. This cause is before the Court on the following: 1. Petitioner Linda M. Morales’ Petition for Hearing to Adjudicate Validity of Third Party Interest Under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n) (Doc. 131), filed December 7, 2012; 2. United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 209), filed October 21, 2013;

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. I. Introduction Defendant-appellant, Juan D. Morales, was found guilty of being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm and sentenced to eighty-six months’ imprisonment. In this appeal, Morales argues the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. He also argues his Fifth Amendment due process rights were violated