Cases

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 21-1490 (Filed Under Seal: February 13, 2023) (Reissued for Publication: February 28, 2023) 1 ************************************ * IXI TECHNOLOGY ELECTRONIC * WARFARE, LLC, dba, IXI EW, *

770 F.Supp.2d 1138 (2011) In the Matter of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA'S APPLICATION FOR A SEARCH WARRANT TO SEIZE AND SEARCH ELECTRONIC DEVICES FROM EDWARD CUNNIUS. No. 2:11-mj-00055-JPD-JLR. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. February 11, 2011. *1139 MEMORANDUM ORDER DENYING THE GOVERNMENT'S APPLICATI

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In the Matter of: RICHARD W. No. 20-56047 YORK, D.C. No. 2:19-cv- Debtor, 06214-WDK ------------------------------ OPINION RICHARD W. YORK, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, through its agency Internal Revenue S

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND SUSAN ILLSTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Now before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ Consolidated *1063Class Action Complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS defendants’ motion to dismiss,

534 F.Supp.2d 585 (2008) In the Matter of the Application of the UNITED STATES of America FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING A PROVIDER OF ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION SERVICE TO DISCLOSE RECORDS TO THE GOVERNMENT. Magistrate's No. 07-524M. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. February 19, 2008. Soo C. Song, United States Attorney's Office, Pittsburgh, PA, for Plaintiff.

DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING THE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED BY ALL DEFENDANTS (DOC. #414, #416, #417, #418, & #419), OVERRULING ‘ AS MOOT. DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN LIMINE (DOC. #456, #457, #458, #459, #460, & #461), AND OVERRULING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. #472); JUDGMENT TO ENTER IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS ON..ALL OF PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS; TERMINATION ENTRY. WALTER H. RICE, UNITED STATES DISTRI

THOMAS W. THRASH, JR., United States District Judge This is a patent infringement lawsuit involving Coca-Cola's Freestyle Dispenser. It is before the Court on the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity [Doc. 138]. For the reasons set forth below, the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity [Doc. 138] is GRANTED as to non-infringement of Claims 11, 12, 17, and 21-

808 F.Supp.2d 757 (2011) Ryan HART, individually and on: behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC., a Delaware Corporation; and Does 1-50, Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-cv-5990 (FLW). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. September 9, 2011. *760 Keith A. McKenna, McKenna McLlwain, LLP,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF JASON LEOPOLD TO UNSEAL Misc. Action No. 13-mc-00712 CERTAIN ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE APPLICATIONS AND ORDERS. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell MEMORANDUM OPINION Jason Leopold and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press filed petitions to unseal voluminous judicial records, dating

MEMORANDUM OPINION LIAM O’GRADY, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Petitioners’ Objections to rulings issued by United States Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan regarding an Order issued after application under Title II of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, known as the Stored Communications Act (SCA), 18 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq. In their Motion to Vacat

416 F.Supp.2d 754 (2006) In re WHITE ELECTRONIC DSIGNS CORPORATION SECRITIES LITIGATION No. CV04-1499PHX-SRB. United States District Court, D. Arizona. February 14, 2006. *755 *756 Andrew S. Friedman, Francis Joseph Balint, Jr., Patrick James Van Zanen, Bonnett Fairbourn Friedman & Balint PC, Phoe

Slip Op. 13- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE ___________________________________ : BELIMO AUTOMATION A.G., : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : Before: Mark A. Barnett, Judge UNITED STATES, :

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE In the Matter of the Dependency of: No. 84122-0-I Z.A., S.M.A., and S.A.A., (Consolidated with Nos. 84123-8-I, 84124-6-I) Minor Children. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON In the Matter of the Dependency of: No. 84122-0-I Z.A., S.M.A., and S.A.A., (Consolidated with Nos. 84123-8-I, 84124-6-I) Minor Children. DIVISION ONE PUBLISHED OPINION COBURN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF JASON LEOPOLD TO UNSEAL Misc. Action No. 13-mc-00712 CERTAIN ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE APPLICATIONS AND ORDERS. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell MEMORANDUM OPINION Invoking both the First Amendment and common law rights of access to judicial records, Jason Leopold, an investigative journal

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON In the Matter of the Dependency of: No. 84122-0-I Z.A., S.M.A., and S.A.A., (Consolidated with Nos. 84123-8-I, 84124-6-I) Minor Children. DIVISION ONE PUBLISHED OPINION COBURN

LINN, Circuit Judge. Sokymat SA, Irori, and Ake Gustafson appeal the judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California that Gustafson is not a co-inventor and co-owner of U.S. Patent No. 5,281,-855 (“the ’855 patent”), and that Sokymat SA and Irori therefore infringe the ’855 patent. Trovan, Ltd. v. Sokymat SA, No. CV-97-4585-MRP (C.D.Cal. Apr. 24, 2001) (“Opinion”). Beca

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HOLIFIELD, KIRKBY, and GANNON Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellant v. Anderson A. IXCOLGONZALEZ Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

24-2180 (L) United States v. Silva In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term 2024 Argued: February 11, 2025 Decided: July 24, 2025 Nos. 24-2180 (L), 24-2182 (Con) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,