Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Murillo-Ramirez”
United States v. Ramirez-Murillopublic domain
929 F.2d 705 U.S.v.Ramirez-Murillo* NO. 90-5499 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. FEB 26, 1991 1 Appeal From: S.D.Fla. 2
United States v. Fernandezpublic domain
172 F.Supp.2d 1265 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Frank FERNANDEZ, aka "Sapo"; Juan Garcia, aka "Topo"; Mariano Martinez, aka "Chuy"; Jimmy Sanchez, aka "Smokey"; Crispin Alvidrez, aka "Conejo"; Fernando Alvidrez, aka "Cuate"; Javier Alvidrez Duarte; Marcel Arevalo, aka "Psycho"; Daniel Bravo, aka "Sporty"; Mario Castillo, aka "Whisper"; Robert Cervantes, aka "Gypsy"; Roy Galvadon, aka "Spider"; Dominick Gonzales, aka "Solo"; Davi
United States v. Fernandezpublic domain
172 F.Supp.2d 1252 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Frank FERNANDEZ, aka "Sapo"; Juan Garcia, aka "Topo"; Mariano Martinez, aka "Chuy"; Jimmy Sanchez, aka "Smokey"; Crispin Alvidrez, aka "Conejo"; Fernando Alvidrez, aka "Cuate"; Javier Alvidrez Duarte; Marcel Arevalo, aka "Psycho"; Daniel Bravo, aka "Sporty"; Mario Castillo, aka "Whisper"; Robert Cervantes, aka "Gypsy"; Roy Galvadon, aka "Spider"; Dominick Gonzales, aka "Solo"; Davi
United States v. Fernandezpublic domain
TROTT, Circuit Judge: The question before us is whether the district court properly sanctioned the United States for violating a discovery order by precluding the government from seeking the death penalty against Fernando Alvidrez, Marcel Arevalo, Daniel Bravo, Javier Alvidrez Duarte, Gerardo Jacobo, and Robert Mercado (collectively “Defendants”). The district court’s decision to impose this sanction was based on the gover
Lopez-Ruiz v. United Statespublic domain
*847(Reported below: 8 Fed. Appx. 704); (15 Fed. Appx. 404); (8 Fed. Appx. 712); (8 Fed. Appx. 710); (7 Fed. Appx. 592); (8 Fed. Appx. 709); (8 Fed. Appx. 706); (8 Fed. Appx. 671); (7 Fed. Appx. 599); *848
United States v. Frank Fernandezpublic domain
231 F.3d 1240 (9th Cir. 2000) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.FRANK FERNANDEZ, aka Seal A; aka Sapo; JUAN PEREZ GARCIA, aka Seal B; MARIANO D. MARTINEZ, aka Seal C; aka Chuy; JIMMY SANCHEZ; aka Seal D; aka Smokey; MARCEL AREVALO, aka Seal F; aka Psycho; DANIEL BRAVO, aka Seal G; aka Sporty; ROBERT CERVANTES, aka Seal H; aka Gypsy; ROY GAVALDON, aka Seal I; aka Spider; DAVID GONZALES-CONTRERAS, aka Seal J; aka David Contrera
United States v. Mostofskypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA —_—_—_—_—_——— |) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No, 21-138 (JEB) AARON MOSTOFSKY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Aaron Mostofsky, who has been charged in connection with the Capitol riot of January 6, 2021, seeks a bill of particulars to clarify three counts of the Government’s Superseding Indictment. Finding that the vagueness of certain portions of the Indictment could compromise Mostofsky’s abili
United States v. Vincent Stormepublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-2615 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VINCENT STORME, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northe
Ramirez-Barajas (Antonio), Ramirez-Murillo (Clementina) v. Immigration and Naturalization Servicepublic domain
746 F.2d 1487 Ramirez-Barajas (Antonio), Ramirez-Murillo (Clementina)v.Immigration and Naturalization Service NO. 83-7882 United States Court of Appeals,ninth Circuit. OCT 03, 1984 1 Appeal From: B.I.A. 2</
United States v. Saffariniapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. Crim. Action No. 19-216 (EGS) EGHBAL SAFFARINIA (a/k/a “EDDIE SAFFARINIA”), Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Eghbal Saffarinia (“Mr. Saffarinia”), a former Assistant Inspector General for the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development’
United States v. Michelpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal No. 19-148-1 (CKK) PRAKAZREL MICHEL (1), Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (November 6, 2019) In this criminal action, Defendant Prakazrel Michel has brought three pending motions. First, he has moved under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12 to dismiss Counts Two and Three of the Indictment on the basis that they are barred by the statute of limitations. Second, he has moved to sever Count
United States v. Herbert Greenpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-2796 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Herbert G. Green
United States v. Gary Henrypublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-50080 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:16-cr-00862-RHW-1 GARY LAMAR HENRY, AKA OPINION G-Thing, AKA G., Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of
United States v. Ruizpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-386 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:23-cr-01331- GPC-1 v. ALEX RUIZ, OPINION Defendant -
United States v. Veronica Gonzalez-Carmonapublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-1241 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Veronica Gonzalez-Carmona, also known as Cinthia Selene Ramirez Barba, also
United States v. Joseph Keck, Jr.public domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-3534 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Joseph Keck, Jr. Defe
United States v. Jose Ramirez-Martinezpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-1702 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Jose Carlos Ramirez-Martinez De
United States v. Mosquera-Murillopublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 13-cr-134 (BAH) ALFREDO MOSQUERA-MURILLO, Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell and ANTONIO MORENO-MEMBACHE, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION On Septemb
United States v. Victor Stittpublic domain
SUTTON, Circuit Judge, dissenting. There is an easy way to think about this case. And there is a more complicated way. Either way, Stitt’s conviction under Tennessee law for aggravated burglary counts as a “burglary” under the Armed Career Criminal Act. The easy way. The Armed Career Criminal Act establishes a mandatory minimum sentence for firearm offenders who have three previous co
United States v. Gualteropublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GERALD BRUCE LEE, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Omar Fabian Valdes Gualtero’s Motion to Suppress Statements (“Motion to Suppress”) (Doc. 106). On July 18, 2013, a federal grand jury returned an indictment charging Defendant Gualtero and five of his co-defendants with (1) murder of an internationally protected person and aiding and abetting that m