Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. NTS Communications”
Level 3 Communications, LLC v. United Statespublic domain
Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 706; Bid Protest Jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1491; Contract Award Procedures, 10 U.S.C § 2305; Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (“DFARS”) 252.239-7005, 252.239-7006; Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) 14.405, 15.101-2, 15.305(a), 15.306(a), 16.703
MEMORANDUM DuBois, J. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 124 II. RENEWED MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW.. .-126 A. Standard of Review... 126 B. Comcast’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law That Claim 113 of the ’870 Patent is Not Obvious... 127 1. Applicable Law.. .127 2. Su
City of Santa Clarita v. NTS Technical Systemspublic domain
40 Cal.Rptr.3d 244 (2006) 137 Cal.App.4th 264 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NTS TECHNICAL SYSTEMS et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. B169596. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Two. February 3, 2006. *245 Maher & Maher, Michael K. Maher, Anaheim, for Defendants and App
United States v. Baileypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v Criminal Action No. 19-391 (JDB) BRITTANY C. BAILEY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Brittany Colleen Bailey has served approximately five years and 10 months of her 15-year sentence for advertising child pornography, and her projected release date is February 10, 2032.' Before the Court is Bailey’s motion for compassionate release. She contends that her medical issues have substantially diminished her ability t
Jones v. United Statespublic domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 16-CF-1104 ONTIONE B. JONES, APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES
United States v. Carbonepublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1380 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. JAYNE CARBONE, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Richard G. Stearns, U.S. District Judge] Before
Lantek Communications, Inc. v. Hamilton Peckpublic domain
ACCEPTED 02-17-00252-CV SECOND COURT OF APPEALS FORT WORTH, TEXAS NO. 02-17-00252-CV 12/2
United States v. Kelseypublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Criminal Action No. 16-55 (RBW) ) ROBERT KELSEY, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________
United States v. Robinsonpublic domain
Case: 22-30442 Document: 00516988587 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/04/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED
Arnold v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims FOR PUBLICATION No. 15-1252L (Filed: May 22, 2023) ) JOHN ARNOLD, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Rails-to-Trails Temporary Taking:
Alacritech, Inc. v. Century Link Communications LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ROY S. PAYNE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Before the Court is the opening claim construction brief of Alacritech, Inc. (Plaintiff) (Dkt. No. 181, filed on April 4, *8572017),1 the response of Tier 3, Inc., Sawis Communications Corp., CenturyLink Communications LLC, D
United States v. Seefriedpublic domain
Classification/Desc Year Corpus Source or Source Type Excerpt of Concordance Line Contextual summary ription As we said in both Benoit and Ros
United States v. Seefriedpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HUNTER SEEFRIED, Case No. 21-cr-287 (TNM) Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Did the electoral certification on January 6, 2021 involve the “administration of justice”? The answer determines whether significant sentencing enh
United States v. Victor Chichandepublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-50041 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:18-cr-00421- v. BEN-3 VICTOR GASPAR CHICHANDE, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United
United States v. Arnold Taylorpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-10203 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:05-cr-00473- v. WBS-1 ARNOLD RAY TAYLOR, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Distri
Page v. United Statespublic domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. District of Columbia Court of Appeals No. 21-CO-167 DON D. PAGE, Appellant, v. 2013 CF1 12342 UNITED STATES, A
United States v. Donald Trumppublic domain
PUBLIC COPY – SEALED INFORMATION DELETED United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 20, 2023 Decided December 8, 2023 No. 23-3190 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. DONALD J. TRUMP, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columb
United States v. Svirskiypublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1471 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ALLA V. STEPANETS, Defendant, Appellant. No. 19-1595 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. GENE SVIRSKIY, Defenda
United States v. Terrance Bakerpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-50314 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:18-cr- 00779-PA-2 v. TERRANCE DOUGLAS BAKER, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of
Platinum Services, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-456C (Filed: July 25, 2025) ************************** PLATINUM SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ************************** Anthony J. Marchese, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. Carol L. O’Riordan, of counsel. Stephanie A. Fleming, Trial Attorney, United States Depart