Cases

*989MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge. On January 9, 2015, James Patrick Needham (“Needham”) was convicted by a jury on one count of possession of child pornography and one count of distribution of child pornography. Needham now moves for a new trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Cri

B.D. PARKER. JR., Circuit Judge: Defendants-appellants Derrilyn Need-ham, Javier Robles, and Corey Thompson appeal from judgments of conviction in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Lynch, J.) for Hobbs Act robbery and related offenses. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1951, 1952. They challenge their convictions based on an instruction that foreclosed the jury’s consideration of an ess

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge: This case arises from the efforts of the United States Coast Guard to compel James and Janell Needham (“Needhams”) to reimburse the United States, under the Oil Pollution Act (“OPA”), 33 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2720 (2000), for cleanup costs associated with an oil spill. The bankruptcy court, in the first instance, and the district court on appeal, held tha

SMITH, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted James Needham of possession of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B) and (b)(2), and distribution of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2) and (b)(1). The district court 2 sentenced Need-ham to two concurrent 120-month sentences and 15 yea

OPINION OF THE COURT SULLIVAN, Judge: Appellant was tried by general court-martial at Mountain Home Air Force Base, Idaho. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of wrongful distribution of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), wrongful possession of marihuana, and two specifications of wrongful use of marihuana, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. He was senten

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge, concurring: I join the panel’s decision because it is compelled by existing precedent. There is no question that, at the time the search warrant was executed, the officer relied in good faith on the magistrate’s reasonable determination of probable cause. But if the slate were clean, I would also agree with the issuing magistrate that under the totality of the circumstances, probab

DECISION HODGSON, Chief Judge: The issue before us is narrow and turns upon the admissibility of a Department of Justice periodical * tracing the history, use and effects, both physical and psychological, of hallucinogens and marijuana. The appellant argues that such evidence was irrelevant during sentencing as he was convicted of distributing lysergic acid

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

564 F.Supp. 419 (1983) John P. NEEDHAM and Janet Needham, Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES of America and any Internal Revenue Agent, Defendants. No. CIV-81-237-D. United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma. February 10, 1983. *420 Lewis P. Terrell, Lubbock, Tex., for plaintiffs. William S. Price, U.S. Atty., Oklahoma Cit

Memorandum Decision ORME, Judge: ¶1 Aaron David Trent Needham was convicted of eight counts of communications fraud and one count of pattern of unlawful activity. On appeal, he raises a number of challenges, none of which has merit and all of which may be dealt with summarily. ¶2 First, Needham argues that the trial court erred i

GORTON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Michael Bryson ("Bryson" or "plaintiff") brings this pro se claim purportedly on behalf of himself and his company, Bryson Trading Co., Inc. ("Bryson Trading" or "the Company"), challenging the final agency order of the Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation ("the Secretary").1 Bryson seeks an injunction against enforce

Decision PER CURIAM: T1 Aaron David Trent Needham appeals the February 6, 2015 Ruling Dismissing Action for Failure to Effect Service of Process. This case is before the court on a sua sponte motion for summary disposition. We affirm the district court's dismissal of Needham's Amended Complaint. Accordingly, we deny his motion for change of venue and his request f

KELLY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Bryan “Shane” Jones appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his Title VII sex discrimination claim against Defendant-Appellee Needham Trucking, LLC .and his state law tort claim for wrongful interference with a contractual relationship against Defendant-Appellee Julie Needham. See Jones v. Needham, No. CIV-15-0978-HE, 2016 WL 2659618 (W.D. Okla. May 6, 2016). Exercising juri

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1828 Doc: 55 Filed: 09/04/2025 Pg: 1 of 31 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1828 IN RE: GARDASIL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. ------------------------------ TESSA NEEDHAM, Plaintiff –

SARAH S. VANCE, Chair Before the Panel: Needham Excavating, Inc. (NEI) moves under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize pretrial proceedings in this litigation in the Southern District of Iowa. The litigation consists of two actions listed on the attached Schedule A: an action

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS (#712, #741) TO SUPPRESS FACEBOOK EVIDENCE BROWN, Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Motion (#712) to Suppress Facebook Evidence filed by Defendant Ryan Payne1 *1172and the Motion (#741) to Suppress Evidence (Facebook Accounts) filed by Defendant David Lee Fry. The following Defen

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON JAMES NEEDHAM, Individually, ) ) No. 78574-5-I Appellant, ) DIVISION ONE v. ) SHERYL DREYER, Individually, and ) PUBLISHED OPINION her marital community, and DAVITA ) EVERETT PHYSICIANS, INC. P.S. ) dlbla The Ev

OPINION AND ORDER MICHAEL H. SIMON, District Judge. Eric Goodpaster (“Goodpaster” or “Defendant”) is charged with two counts of mail theft under 18 U.S.C. § 1709. Good-paster was indicted by a grand jury on April 8, 2014, and questioned the next day, April 9, 2014. He now moves to suppress all statements he made during that interview. He argues that his statements -were coerced and involuntary; that he w

*1369 SCHALL, Circuit Judge. Adnan Awad brought suit against the United States in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi. In his suit, Mr. Awad asserted various causes of action and sought to recover from the United States in excess of $10,000. Following a bench trial