Cases

MEMORANDUM * Michael Nielsen appeals the district court’s denial of his suppression motion. He argues that the discovery of methamphetamine in his truck parked at the Honolulu Airport was the fruit of an unconstitutional seizure and therefore must be suppressed. We disagree with this contention and affirm the district court. Although Nielsen argues on appeal that he was seized for Fourth

427 F.Supp.2d 872 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Douglas Wayne NIELSEN, Defendant. No. CR03-4078-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. April 13, 2006. *873 Kevin C. Fletcher, U.S. Attorney's Office, Sioux City, IA, for Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING RESE

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 00-1335 United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Nielsen, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 99 CR 391-1--Charles R. Norgle, Sr., Judge. Argued October 3, 2000--Decided November 13, 2000 Before Flaum, Chief Judge, and Coffey and Rovner, Circuit Judges. Flaum, Chief Judge. On the day prior to his scheduled t

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-2965 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Scott Joseph Nielsen Defendan

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Opinion by Judge TASHIMA; Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN. OPINION TASHIMA, Circuit Judge: William Nielsen appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to coercion and enticement of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). Nielsen contends that the district court erred when it calculated the Sentencing Guidelines range for his offense. Specifically, Nielsen contends that th

639 F.Supp.2d 1020 (2009) Lassa NIELSEN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Case No. 8:09CV31. United States District Court, D. Nebraska. June 23, 2009. *1021 Lassa Nielsen, Scottsbluff, NE, pro se. Lynnett M. Wagner, Assistant United States Attorney, Omaha, NE, for Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND

610 F.2d 819 U. S.v.Nielsen No. 79-1165 United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit 10/4/79 1 N.D.Ill. AFFIRMED

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Robert J. Faris, United States Bankruptcy Judge The debtors in this chapter 7 case are the settlors, lifetime beneficiaries, and trustees of a trust which they may revoke or amend at any time. They contributed real property to the trust. They live in one of the two buildings on the property. They have claimed a homestead exemptio

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.Justice KAVANAUGH took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND A. Statutory Background The TPS statute is 8 U.S.C. § 1254a. Section 1254a(b) covers TPS designations. It provides in relevant part as follows. (1) In general. The Attorney General, after consultation with appropriate agencies of the Government, may designate any foreign state (or any part of such foreign state) under this su

DONOVAN W. FRANK, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION This lawsuit arises out of a family's detention at a United States-Canada border crossing. Plaintiffs Abdisalam Wilwal, Sagal Abdigani, and their four children ages 5, 6, 8, and 14 (collectively, "Plaintiffs") bring this lawsuit claiming their detention

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Michael Markowicz is a white man employed as a Special Agent by the United States Secret Service, an organization within the purview of the United States Department of Homeland Security (the "Department"). He claims that the Department denied him a promotion because of his race, and instead promoted three minority candidates.

NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, United States District Judge This case arises out of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services' ("USCIS") denial of Plaintiff Jamalin Patricia Morris's petition for U nonimmigrant status pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(U). Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment, and Defendants hav

Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied.

FRED BIERY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is the 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus Petition filed by Mindra Berecz Bansci and Junior Munteanu ("Petitioners") (Docket Entry "DE" *7321); Petitioners

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTIONHon. Roger T. Benitez, United States District Judge *1113Pending before the Court are Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction,1 Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary inju

ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge BACKGROUND Plaintiff Jolly Manoj Caplash ("Plaintiff") commenced this litigation on December 29, 2015, and requested that this Court set aside the denial and subsequent refusals to reopen Plaintiff's Form I-130 family-based immigration petition (the "Petition") filed on behalf of his brother with the United States Citizenship and Immigratio

JAMES DONATO, United States District Judge This case is a putative class action brought by thirty-six named plaintiffs against the United States Department of Homeland Security, the Department of State, the agencies for Customs and Border Protection and Citizenship and Immigration Services, and their senior leaders. Dkt. No. 34. Plaintiffs challenge the government's conduct in connection with a waiver program that would permit the