Cases

Case: 19-50997 Document: 00515936062 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/13/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 13, 2021

PAMELA K. CHEN, United States District Judge Defendant Jaime Reyes Nunez ("Reyes Nunez") is charged under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(1) with illegal reentry into the United States subsequent to the entry of a deportation order in 2006. Reyes Nunez moves to dismiss the indictment pursuant to

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: In this direct criminal appeal, the defendants appeal their convictions and sentences on charges of harboring illegal aliens for financial gain and conspiracy to hold aliens hostage. Based on arguments of counsel, our review of the briefs and the record, we AFFIRM their convictions, MODIFY their sentences on Count One and otherwise AFFIRM their over

USCA4 Appeal: 20-1305 Doc: 42 Filed: 10/24/2022 Pg: 1 of 12 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1305 MARIA MORALES, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ALICIA MARIA MARQUEZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-cv-3225 (TSC) ) MI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) NELSON’S CABINETRY, INC., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Vv. ) Civil Action No. 24-1335 (PLF) ) ANTONY J. BLINKEN, ) Secretary of State, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) OPINION Plaintiff Nelson’s Cabinetry, Inc., a Virginia corporation, filed an employment-based visa petition on behalf of Carlos Eduardo Pimentel, an employee of Nelson’s Cabinetry and a Brazilian national. The consular officer ultimately denied Mr. Pimentel’s visa

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WINSTON IVAN GUTIERREZ- No. 17-71012 ALM, Agency No. Petitioner, A070-031-172 v. OPINION MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the

270 F.3d 1272 (9th Cir. 2001) JULIO CESAR OTAROLA, PETITIONER,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, RESPONDENT. No. 99-71405 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Argued and Submitted July 9, 2001Filed October 18, 2001 Alexander N. Lopez, Glendale, California, and Maziar Razi, Pasadena, California, for the

534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder

238 F.3d 371 (5th Cir. 2001) MANDANA KASHANIAN MCBRIDE, also known as Mandana Kashanian Milne, Petitioner,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent,MEHRANGIZ EGHBAL PIXLEY, Petitioner,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. Nos. 97-60349, 99-60610. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, FIFTH CIRCUIT January 19, 2001

Opinión disidente emitida por la Juez Asociada Señora Ro-dríguez Rodríguez. “A line will take us hours maybe; Yet if it does not seem a moment’s thought, our stitching and unstit-ching has been naught”. —W.B. Yeats, Adam’s Cursei1) Escribir una sentencia o una opinión de este Tribunal

OPINION BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Riad Yacoub Sad appeals the denial of his application for suspension of deportation, arguing that proper construction of the transitional provisions of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009 (“IIRIRA”), forecloses retroactive application of a stop-time

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 976(b) and 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts 2, 3 and 4. [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 171 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DIEGO N. et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 1:26-cv-00577 (CJN) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Federal law requires that, when unaccompanied children arrive at the United States border, they must b

BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. A group of employees filed class and collective actions against Tyson Foods, Inc., seeking unpaid wages for time spent on pre- and post-shift activities. After the employees obtained a sizeable verdict and fee award, 1 Tyson unsuccessfully moved for judgment as a matter of law. On appeal, Tys

Opinión disidente emitida por el Juez Asociado Señor Rivera Pérez. Mediante el presente caso, la Mayoría invade las facul-tades de gobierno propio que disfrutan los partidos políti-cos bajo el esquema democrático contenido en la Constitu-ción de Puerto Rico. La opinión mayoritaria interviene en forma impermisible con la amplia discreción de los parti-dos políticos para formular e interpretar su reglamenta-ción

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX ELEANOR ABRAHAM, ET AL., CASE NO. SX-11-CV-0000550 Plaintiffs, ACTION FOR: DAMAGES vs. ST. CROIX RENAISSANCE GROUP, LLLP, Defendant. NOTICE OF ENTRY OF MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TO: JUDGES AND MAGISTRATE JUDGES OF THE SUPERIOR COURT LEE J. ROHN, ESQ. JOEL H. HOLT, ESQ. CARL J. HARTMANN III, ESQ. IT/LAW CLERKS/LAW LIBRARY ORDER BOOK PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on February 03, 2020 a(n) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER dated Fe

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV