Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Norbergs”
McIntyre v. United Statespublic domain
LYNCH, Circuit Judge. These two cases involve claims against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq., arising out of alleged wrongful actions of FBI agents. On September 15, 1999, a diligent federal trial judge sitting in an organized crime case issued a lengthy opinion outlining a possible patte
McIntyre v. United Statespublic domain
336 F.Supp.2d 87 (2004) Emily MCINTYRE and Christopher McIntyre as co-administrators of the Estate of John L. McIntyre, Plaintiffs, v. The UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.01-CV-10408-RC. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 30, 2004. *88 *89
United States v. Buoipublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1518 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. ELIJAH MAJAK BUOI, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. F. Dennis Saylor, IV, U.S. District Judge] Befor
United States v. Hopublic domain
Slip Op. 20-66 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. Before: Timothy M. Reif, Judge CHU-CHIANG “KEVIN” HO, Court No. 19-00038 and ATRIA CORPORATION, Defendants. OPINION [Quashing plaintiff’s service of process upo
United States v. Yatespublic domain
774 F.Supp. 1368 (1991) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Ernest J. YATES and Edward M. Schuster, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 91-8-VAL (WDO). United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division. September 25, 1991. *1369 Karen B. Bragman, Anne S. Infinger, Atlanta, Ga., for Ernest J. Yates. Lillian Harris Locka
United States v. State of Texaspublic domain
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 25-10898 July 9, 2026 ____________ Lyle W. Cayce
Cangemi v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER SEYBEBT, District Judge. Plaintiffs Thomas Cangemi, Jodi Cangemi, Mariann Coleman, Francis J. Devito, Lynn R. Devito, Leon Kircik, Elizabeth Kircik, Carol C. Lang, Terry S. Bienstock, Daniel Livingston, Victoria Livingston, Robin Racanelli, James E. Ritterhoff, Gale H. Ritterhoff1, Elise V. Thompson Trust, John Tomitz, and Thelma Weinberg as Trustee
Rogers v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING INTERVENTION WILLIAMS, Judge. SDC Communities, Inc. (“SDC”) has moved to intervene in this matter, arguing that it is entitled to any compensation the Court may award to one of the named Plaintiffs, JMC-Real Estate, LLC (“JMC”) as a result of the Government’s taking of JMC’s property. Plaintiffs vigorously oppose intervention, and the Government takes no position on SDC’s
United States v. Colin Norbergpublic domain
BOWNES, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant, Colin Norberg, was convicted after a jury-waived trial on seven counts of submission of false statements to a federally insured bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1014 1 and 18 U.S.C. § 2.
United States v. Funds in the Amount of $574,840public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JEFFREY COLE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE On March 31, 2015, Judge Coleman granted the government’s motion to compel responses to Supplemental Rule G(6) interrogatories. She explained that the claimants had simply “offered lengthy objections” and “only provided conclusory responses regarding their ownership and possessory interests that added nothing new or different to
United States v. Wellspublic domain
Justice Souter delivered the opinion of the Court. The principal issue before us is whether materiality of falsehood is an element of the crime of knowingly making a false statement to a federally insured bank, 18 U. S. C. § 1014. We hold that it is not. I In 1993, the Government charged respondents, Jerry Wells and Kenneth Steele, with violating and conspiring to viola
United States v. Frazapublic domain
BAILEY ALDRICH, Senior Circuit Judge. James Fraza and his son Scott (“James” and “Scott,” collectively “defendants”) were indicted on various counts of fraud, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1041, 1341, 1344, 1346, and violations of the Taft-Hartley Act, 18 U.S.C. § 371, arising from a scheme to defraud a credit union. After a four day jury trial, both defendants were found guilty on all count
United States v. Frazapublic domain
USCA1 Opinion UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 96-1219 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
United States v. Gilbergpublic domain
CYR, Circuit Judge. Defendant Gary S. Gilberg challenges several district court rulings relating to his trial and sentencing for conspiring to make, and making, false statements to financial institutions in order to procure mortgage loan financing, see 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 & 1014. We affirm all but the restitutionary sentence. I
United States v. Gilbergpublic domain
USCA1 Opinion UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________
United States v. Behennapublic domain
USCA1 Opinion January 5, 1995 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 94-1571 UNITED STATES,
Kellett v. United Statespublic domain
USCA1 Opinion April 6, 1994 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 93-1843 H. RAYMOND KELLETT, JR., Petitioner,
United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Companypublic domain
358 F.Supp. 820 (1972) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY and Pacific Northwest Pipeline Corporation, Defendants. Civ. A. No. C-2626. United States District Court, D. Colorado. June 16, 1972. On Motion to Reinstate Decree August 30, 1972. *821 *822
United States v. Brennanpublic domain
832 F.Supp. 435 (1991) UNITED STATES of America v. James F. BRENNAN, J. Edward McHugh. Crim. No. 90-10235-WF. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. October 3, 1991. As Corrected October 29, 1991. *436 *437 *438 S. Theodore Merritt
United States v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporationpublic domain
271 F.Supp. 561 (1967) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION et al., Defendants. Crim. No. 40052. United States District Court N. D. California. July 31, 1967. *562 *563 *564 Lyle L. Jones, San Francisco, Cal., Lawrence