Cases

USCA4 Appeal: 23-4185 Doc: 79 Filed: 06/17/2025 Pg: 1 of 46 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-4185 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JOSE DOMINGO ORDONEZ-ZOMETA, a/k/a Felon, Defendant – Appella

MEMORANDUM OPINION Robert E. Payne, Senior United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE RULE 15 DEPOSITIONS (ECF No. 35) (the “Deposition Motion”), seeking leave to depose Josué Giron (“Giron”),1 Elmer Lopez (“Lopez”), and Yeris Hernandez Ordondez (“Yeris”), the Defendant’s brother. For the reasons set forth below, the mo

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Andres Ramos Ordonez has *307moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramos Ordonez has

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Mario Alfredo Ordonez-Coreas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Ordonez-Coreas has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portion

680 F.3d 1135 (2012) Galo Alejandro ORDONEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 09-56533. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 13, 2012. Filed May 29, 2012. *1136 Alex Davis (argued), Candace Carroll, Michael Devitt, University of San Die

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 15-2187 AGUEDITA ORDONEZ-TEVALAN; JULIO GONZALEZ ORDONEZ, Petitioners v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents

OPINION OF THE COURT NYGAARD, .Circuit Judge. I. Luis Javier Mendoza-Ordonez, a citizen of the Republic of Honduras, crossed the United States border without inspection on two occasions. After his first entry Customs and Border Patrol officers (CBP) detained him and the Government returned him to Honduras under an expedited removal.

OPINION GREENBERG, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes on before this Court on a petition for review of two decisions and orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). Aguedita Odilia Ordo-nez-Tevalan (“Ordonez”) petitions for review of the BIA’s decision and order dismissing her appeal from a decision and order of

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-Appellant Oscar Edwardo Tello-Ordonez, who pled guilty in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Townes, J.) to illegally reentering the United States after being deported following his conviction for an aggravated felony, appeals his sentence of fifty-seven months in prison to run consecutively to the sentence he is currently serving in state prison on drug charges. We assume th

597 F.3d 972 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Noe ARIAS-ORDONEZ, Defendant-Appellee. No. 08-10259. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 9, 2009. Filed March 8, 2010. *974 Owen P. Martikan, San Francisco, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant. Elizabe

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 15-2187 ______________ AGUEDITA ORDONEZ-TEVALAN; JULIO GONZALEZ ORDONEZ, Petitioners v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATE OF AMERICA, Respondent _____________

*83 THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Manuel Ordonez-Quino seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the United Nations Convention Against Torture. Among other th

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 08-10259 Plaintiff-Appellant, v.  D.C. No. 3:07-cr-00738-MMC NOE ARIAS-ORDONEZ, OPINION Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from th

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

244 F.Supp.2d 770 (2003) UNITED STATES of America v. Adelina Anita ORDONEZ AKA: Adelina Anita Contreras AKA: Adelina Ordenez, Defendant. No. CR.A.B-02-563-2. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Brownsville Division. February 4, 2003. *771 Mr. Angel Castro, Assistant United States Attorney, Brownsville, TX, for Petitioner.</

598 F.3d 222 (2010) Ronal Porfirio ORDONEZ OROSCO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Janet NAPOLITANO, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; Eduardo Lozano, Immigration and Customs Enforcement Officer; Unnamed *223 Supervisory Immigration and Customs Enforcement Officers; and the United States of America, Respondents-Appellees. No. 09-40004. United States Court o