Cases

(Reported below: 95 Fed. Appx. 117); (95 Fed. Appx. 606); (93 Fed. Appx. 663); (95 Fed. Appx. 118); (95 Fed. Appx. 582); (95 Fed. Appx. 629); (95 Fed. Appx. 661); (95 Fed. Appx. 662); (95 Fed. Appx. 630); (95 Fed. Appx. 645); (92 Fed. Appx. 990); (95 Fed. Appx. 631); <

MEMORANDUM ** Carlos Castaneda appeals the 12-month sentence imposed for his supervised-release violation, which was set to ran consecutively with an 84-month sentence previously imposed following his guilty-plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and affirm.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-2278 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. William Waldemar Godoy, also known as Raul Alexander Vasquez-Godea, also known as Juan Carlo

Robert E. Payne, Senior United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE INDICTMENT (the "Motion") (ECF No. 13), which for the following reasons, will be denied. BACKGROUND I. Procedural Context Erlin Torres Zuniga ("Torres")1 was charged in a one-count indictment with ill

Saris, C.J. *174INTRODUCTION Defendant Adilson Barbosa moves to dismiss the indictment charging him with illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Relying on Pereira v. Sessi

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0054p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plainti

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-30181 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:19-cr-00135-RMP JAIME CASTELLANOS-AVALOS, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Rosanna Malouf Peterson, Dist

JUDITH E. LEVY, United States District Judge Defendant Leopoldo Vargas-Molina was indicted for unlawful reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He filed two motions to dismiss the indictment, both of which go to the validity of his underlying removal order from 2011. Vargas-Molina relies upon § 1326(d) to collaterally att

Robert E. Payne, Senior United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on the Defendant's MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT (the "Motion") (ECF No. 18). For the reasons set forth below, the Motion will be denied. BACKGROUND I. Procedural Context Trinidad Diaz-Martinez ("Diaz-Martinez") was charged in a one-count indictment with illegal reent

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 21-2378 _____________ SELVIN HERALDO SABAN-CACH, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA _______________

HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge. Emerald Nkomo petitions for review of her final order of removal. Her petition requires us to decide a question of first impression in this Court: whether a notice to appear that fails to specify the time and place of an initial removal hearing deprives an immigration judge of jurisdiction over the removal proceedings. We hold that it does not.

671 F.3d 1036 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Willis Roberto REYES-BONILLA, aka Francisco Alvarado Garcia, aka Francisco Garcia Alvarado, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-50361. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 3, 2011. Filed February 6, 2012. *1038 Brenda

655 F.3d 1077 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Mario BARAJAS-ALVARADO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-50134. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 15, 2011. Filed August 24, 2011. *1079 James M. Chavez, Esquire, Federal Defenders of San Diego, San Diego,

OPINION PAEZ, Circuit Judge: Defendant Encarnación Gonzalez-Villalobos appeals his conviction for illegal reentry after a prior deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. In the district court he moved to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the prior deportation order was fundamentally unfair. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d). After

JORDAN, Circuit Judge In this immigration case, we consider the term "particular social group," which is part of the definition of "refugee" in the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"), 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(42). We must decide whether a revised interpreta

597 F.3d 972 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Noe ARIAS-ORDONEZ, Defendant-Appellee. No. 08-10259. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted October 9, 2009. Filed March 8, 2010. *974 Owen P. Martikan, San Francisco, CA, for the plaintiff-appellant. Elizabe

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 08-10259 Plaintiff-Appellant, v.  D.C. No. 3:07-cr-00738-MMC NOE ARIAS-ORDONEZ, OPINION Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from th

O’BRIEN, Circuit Judge. On June 18, 2004, Jesus Cordova-Areva-lo (Cordova-Arevalo) pled guilty to illegally reentering the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)(1),(2). The presentence investigation report (PSR) recommended a sixteen-level-enhancement pursuant to USSG § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A), treating Cordova-Areva-lo’s prior Colorado conviction (third de

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE United States of America v. Criminal No. 18-cr-127-LM Opinion No. 2020 DNH 063 Ahmad Khawaja O R D E R On May 2, 2019, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of importation of a controlled substance (MDMA) in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a), 960(a)(1), and 960(b)(3). On January 3, 2

5 F.3d 542NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Guadalupe A. MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Paul MATA, Defendant-