Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. PROCOPIO”
United States v. Procopiopublic domain
BOUDIN, Circuit Judge. On April 9, 1991, three armed, masked men stole $1.2 million in cash about to be loaded into an armored car belonging to Berkshire Armored Car Services, Inc. (“Berkshire”). The crime occurred in Pitts-field, Massachusetts. On June 10, 1993, the government indicted Bernard J. Kiley, Vincent A Lattanzio, Donald J. Abbott, Francis J. Proeopio and Charles R. G
Procopio v. Wilkiepublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Procopio v. Wilkiepublic domain
Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge Lourie. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge O'Malley. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge Chen, in which Circuit Judge Dyk joins. Moore, Circuit Judge. *1373 Alfred Pr
Alfred Procopio, Jr. v. Eric K. Shinsekipublic domain
HAGEL, Judge: Alfred Procopio, Jr., appeals through counsel a March 16, 2011, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision denying entitlement to VA benefits for prostate cancer and diabetes mellitus type II with edema, both to include as secondary to herbicide exposure. Record (R.) at 3-15. Mr. Procopio’s Notice of Appeal was timely, and the Court has jurisdiction to review the
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Procopio v. Secretary of Veterans Affairspublic domain
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ALFRED PROCOPIO, JR., JOHNNIE HARPER, MICHAEL YATES, MICHAEL KVINTUS, BLUE WATER NAVY VIETNAM VETERANS ASSOCIATION, MILITARY-VETERANS ADVOCACY, Petitioners v. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent ______________________ 2019-2184 ______
Montiel v. United Statespublic domain
Tax case; claim for refund of taxes paid by a person alleged to be a nonresident alien; timeliness of request for refund; I.R.C. §§ 6511, 7422; genuine dispute of jurisdictional fact OPINION AND ORDER LETTOW, Judge In this tax case, plaintiff Maria Montiel seeks to obtain a refund for her 2007 and 2008 federal income taxes, which
Free-Pacheco v. United Statespublic domain
Federal Tax Deductions; Foreign Nonresident; 26 U.S.C. § 871; Trade or Business; 26 C.F.R. § 1.183-2; Continuity and Regularity; Expectation of Profit; Gambling; Slot Machines. OPINION HORN, J. Plaintiff, Enrique Free Pacheco, a Mexican citizen and nonresident of the United States, brought suit to recover a tax refund in excess o
United States v. John McTiernanpublic domain
OPINION GILMAN, Circuit Judge: John McTiernan, a famous Hollywood movie director, hired former private investigator Anthony Pellicano in 2000 to illegally wiretap the telephone conversations of two individuals. Six years later, when the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) questioned McTiernan about Pellicano’s activities, McTiernan claimed that he knew
Leeds Lp v. United Statespublic domain
807 F.Supp.2d 946 (2011) LEEDS LP, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Fourth Investment LP, Plaintiff, v. United States of America, Defendant. Case Nos. 08CV100, 08CV110 BTM (BLM). United States District Court, S.D. California. August 5, 2011. *948 Edward C. Walton, Procopio Cory Hargreaves & Savit
Russell v. United Statespublic domain
551 F.3d 1174 (2008) Timothy J. RUSSELL; Anita L. Russell, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant, and Holly Williams, Public Trustee of El Paso County, Defendant. No. 07-1438. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. December 19, 2008. *1176 Philip J. Giacinti, Jr., of Procopio, Cory, Ha
MEMORANDUM * Earl Bridges, on behalf of the United States, appeals the district court’s judgment as a matter of law for Macro-Z Technologies (MZT) in his qui tam action under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729. We agree with the district court that Bridges did not produce sufficient evidence at trial to substantiate his claims and, therefore, affirm the judgment. Bridges first claim
Expansion Pointe v. Procopio, Corypublic domain
61 Cal.Rptr.3d 166 (2007) 152 Cal.App.4th 51 EXPANSION POINTE PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PROCOPIO, CORY, HARGREAVES & SAVITCH, LLP, et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. D048189. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District, Division One. June 15, 2007. *169 R.A. Ma
Procopio v. Johnsonpublic domain
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs, hoping to adopt a child, became foster parents to a little girl born to an active drug addict. They nursed her through chronic narcotic withdrawal and cared for her for five years. When the birth parents successfully sought to have custody of the girl returned to them, the plaintiffs sued, asserting a violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in addition to state law claims. The district court dism
Procopio v. Johnsonpublic domain
994 F.2d 325 61 USLW 2682 Joseph and Marjorie PROCOPIO, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Gordon JOHNSON, Former Director, Illinois Department ofChildren and Family Services; Jess McDonald, Former InterimDirector, Illinois Department of Children and FamilyServices; Sue Suter, Former Director, Illinois Departmentof Children and Family Services; Sterling M. Ryder,Director, Illinois Department of Child
Procopio v. Johnsonpublic domain
785 F.Supp. 1317 (1992) Joseph and Marjorie PROCOPIO, Plaintiffs, v. Gordon JOHNSON, Former Director, Illinois Department of Children and Family Services; Jess McDonald, Former Interim Director, Illinois Department of Children and Family Services; Sue Suter, Director, Illinois Department of Children and Family Services; Hephzibah Children's Association, a Not-For-Profit Corporation; and Lutheran Child and Family Services, a Not-For-Profit Corpora
First Guaranty Mortgage Corp. v. Procopiopublic domain
217 F.Supp.2d 633 (2002) FIRST GUARANTY MORTGAGE CORP. v. Ronald PROCOPIO, et al. No. CIV.A. WMN-02-326. United States District Court, D. Maryland. June 20, 2002. *634 Gerald Frederick Chapman, Gerald F. Chapman LLC, Bethesda, MD, for Plaintiff. Ian A. Williams, Washington, DC, Terrence C. McAndrews, Law Offices of Terrenc
Procopio v. Univ. School of Novapublic domain
138 F.3d 957 Procopiov.Univ. School of Nova* NO. 97-4551 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. March 10, 1998 Appeal From: S.D.Fla. ,No.9706045CIVWJZ 1 Affirmed.
Expansion Pointe Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch, LLPpublic domain
Opinion McCONNELL, P. J. In Ferguson v. Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein (2003) 30 Cal.4th 1037, 1046-1053 [135 Cal.Rptr.2d 46, 69 P.3d 965] CFerguson), the California Supreme Court held that as a matter of public policy lost punitive damages in an underlying action are not recoverable as compensatory damages in a legal malpractice action. Plaintiff Expansion Pointe Properties Limited Partnership