⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. PROCOPIO”

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996-07-09 · Published · cited 111× · 88 F.3d 21; 45 Fed. R. Serv. 142; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 16290; 1996 WL 369378
BOUDIN, Circuit Judge. On April 9, 1991, three armed, masked men stole $1.2 million in cash about to be loaded into an armored car belonging to Berkshire Armored Car Services, Inc. (“Berkshire”). The crime occurred in Pitts-field, Massachusetts. On June 10, 1993, the government indicted Bernard J. Kiley, Vincent A Lattanzio, Donald J. Abbott, Francis J. Proeopio and Charles R. G
Procopio v. Wilkiepublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2020-05-04 · Published · cited 0× · 140 S. Ct. 2738; 206 L. Ed. 2d 917
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Procopio v. Wilkiepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019-01-29 · Published · cited 39× · 913 F.3d 1371
Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge Lourie. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge O'Malley. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge Chen, in which Circuit Judge Dyk joins. Moore, Circuit Judge. *1373 Alfred Pr
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2012-10-16 · Published · cited 2× · 26 Vet. App. 76; 2012 WL 4882287; 2012 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 2140
HAGEL, Judge: Alfred Procopio, Jr., appeals through counsel a March 16, 2011, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision denying entitlement to VA benefits for prostate cancer and diabetes mellitus type II with edema, both to include as secondary to herbicide exposure. Record (R.) at 3-15. Mr. Procopio’s Notice of Appeal was timely, and the Court has jurisdiction to review the
Supreme Court of the United States · 1998-10-05 · Published · cited 0× · 525 U.S. 873
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1998-10-05 · Published · cited 0× · 525 U.S. 873; 119 S. Ct. 173
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019-12-05 · Published · cited 1× · 943 F.3d 1376
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ALFRED PROCOPIO, JR., JOHNNIE HARPER, MICHAEL YATES, MICHAEL KVINTUS, BLUE WATER NAVY VIETNAM VETERANS ASSOCIATION, MILITARY-VETERANS ADVOCACY, Petitioners v. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent ______________________ 2019-2184 ______
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2014-08-07 · Published · cited 0× · 118 Fed. Cl. 283; 114 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5649; 2014 U.S. Claims LEXIS 753; 2014 WL 3867360
Tax case; claim for refund of taxes paid by a person alleged to be a nonresident alien; timeliness of request for refund; I.R.C. §§ 6511, 7422; genuine dispute of jurisdictional fact OPINION AND ORDER LETTOW, Judge In this tax case, plaintiff Maria Montiel seeks to obtain a refund for her 2007 and 2008 federal income taxes, which
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2014-07-16 · Published · cited 1× · 117 Fed. Cl. 228; 2014 WL 3533968
Federal Tax Deductions; Foreign Nonresident; 26 U.S.C. § 871; Trade or Business; 26 C.F.R. § 1.183-2; Continuity and Regularity; Expectation of Profit; Gambling; Slot Machines. OPINION HORN, J. Plaintiff, Enrique Free Pacheco, a Mexican citizen and nonresident of the United States, brought suit to recover a tax refund in excess o
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012-08-20 · Published · cited 143× · 695 F.3d 882; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 17473; 2012 WL 3553476
OPINION GILMAN, Circuit Judge: John McTiernan, a famous Hollywood movie director, hired former private investigator Anthony Pellicano in 2000 to illegally wiretap the telephone conversations of two individuals. Six years later, when the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) questioned McTiernan about Pellicano’s activities, McTiernan claimed that he knew
District Court, S.D. California · 2011-08-05 · Published · cited 1× · 807 F. Supp. 2d 946; 108 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5547; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86761; 2011 WL 3475282
807 F.Supp.2d 946 (2011) LEEDS LP, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Fourth Investment LP, Plaintiff, v. United States of America, Defendant. Case Nos. 08CV100, 08CV110 BTM (BLM). United States District Court, S.D. California. August 5, 2011. *948 Edward C. Walton, Procopio Cory Hargreaves & Savit
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-12-19 · Published · cited 43× · 551 F.3d 1174; 102 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 7337; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 25754; 2008 WL 5264733
551 F.3d 1174 (2008) Timothy J. RUSSELL; Anita L. Russell, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant, and Holly Williams, Public Trustee of El Paso County, Defendant. No. 07-1438. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. December 19, 2008. *1176 Philip J. Giacinti, Jr., of Procopio, Cory, Ha
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-08-01 · Published · cited 0× · 244 F. App'x 799
MEMORANDUM * Earl Bridges, on behalf of the United States, appeals the district court’s judgment as a matter of law for Macro-Z Technologies (MZT) in his qui tam action under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729. We agree with the district court that Bridges did not produce sufficient evidence at trial to substantiate his claims and, therefore, affirm the judgment. Bridges first claim
California Court of Appeal · 2007-06-15 · Published · cited 5× · 61 Cal. Rptr. 3d 166; 152 Cal. App. 4th 51
61 Cal.Rptr.3d 166 (2007) 152 Cal.App.4th 51 EXPANSION POINTE PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PROCOPIO, CORY, HARGREAVES & SAVITCH, LLP, et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. D048189. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District, Division One. June 15, 2007. *169 R.A. Ma
Procopio v. Johnsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993-05-06 · Published · cited 5× · 994 F.2d 325; 1993 WL 143870
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs, hoping to adopt a child, became foster parents to a little girl born to an active drug addict. They nursed her through chronic narcotic withdrawal and cared for her for five years. When the birth parents successfully sought to have custody of the girl returned to them, the plaintiffs sued, asserting a violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in addition to state law claims. The district court dism
Procopio v. Johnsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993-05-06 · Published · cited 27× · 994 F.2d 325; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 10462
994 F.2d 325 61 USLW 2682 Joseph and Marjorie PROCOPIO, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Gordon JOHNSON, Former Director, Illinois Department ofChildren and Family Services; Jess McDonald, Former InterimDirector, Illinois Department of Children and FamilyServices; Sue Suter, Former Director, Illinois Departmentof Children and Family Services; Sterling M. Ryder,Director, Illinois Department of Child
Procopio v. Johnsonpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992-03-19 · Published · cited 2× · 785 F. Supp. 1317; 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3292; 1992 WL 52100
785 F.Supp. 1317 (1992) Joseph and Marjorie PROCOPIO, Plaintiffs, v. Gordon JOHNSON, Former Director, Illinois Department of Children and Family Services; Jess McDonald, Former Interim Director, Illinois Department of Children and Family Services; Sue Suter, Director, Illinois Department of Children and Family Services; Hephzibah Children's Association, a Not-For-Profit Corporation; and Lutheran Child and Family Services, a Not-For-Profit Corpora
District Court, D. Maryland · 2002-06-20 · Published · cited 1× · 217 F. Supp. 2d 633; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16121; 2002 WL 1988255
217 F.Supp.2d 633 (2002) FIRST GUARANTY MORTGAGE CORP. v. Ronald PROCOPIO, et al. No. CIV.A. WMN-02-326. United States District Court, D. Maryland. June 20, 2002. *634 Gerald Frederick Chapman, Gerald F. Chapman LLC, Bethesda, MD, for Plaintiff. Ian A. Williams, Washington, DC, Terrence C. McAndrews, Law Offices of Terrenc
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998-03-10 · Published · cited 0× · 138 F.3d 957; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 7017; 1998 WL 117348
138 F.3d 957 Procopiov.Univ. School of Nova* NO. 97-4551 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. March 10, 1998 Appeal From: S.D.Fla. ,No.9706045CIVWJZ 1 Affirmed.
California Court of Appeal · 2007-06-15 · Published · cited 5× · 152 Cal. App. 4th 42; 61 Cal. Rptr. 3d 166; 2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 993
Opinion McCONNELL, P. J. In Ferguson v. Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein (2003) 30 Cal.4th 1037, 1046-1053 [135 Cal.Rptr.2d 46, 69 P.3d 965] CFerguson), the California Supreme Court held that as a matter of public policy lost punitive damages in an underlying action are not recoverable as compensatory damages in a legal malpractice action. Plaintiff Expansion Pointe Properties Limited Partnership