Cases

Appendix A Department of Justice Chart Documenting Sentences in Capitol Breach Cases Monday, January 6, 2025 SENTENCES IMPOSED IN CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6, 2021 Disclaimer: Those relying on information contained in this document should verify all information for accuracy Table 1: Cases in which the government recommended a probation sentence without home detention 1 0F Defendant Ca

HANEY, Circuit Judge (dissenting). The decision in this case is important, not for the mere fact that the government has expended $2,000,000 on improvements on the land in question, but because under the doctrine of the majority opinion, none of the hundreds of Mexican grants in California are immune to attack. As the statement of facts is somewhat scattered throughout the majority opinion, I restate them for a

*105SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal from the opinion and order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Griesa, J.), vacating the Injunctions against Argentina upon the occurrence of two conditions precedent. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and the procedural history of the case and therefore addre

FERNANDO F. ALMEIDA, Petitioner, v. ERICH. HOLDER, JR.,[1] Respondent. No. 08-1410-ag. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: October 31, 2008. Decided: December 8, 2009. MICHAEL A. UGOLINI, Springfield, Massachusetts, for Petitioner. R. ALEXANDER GORING, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation (Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attor

548 F.3d 207 (2008) Karen Nicola ALSOL, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, United States Attorney General, Respondent, Donald Overton Powell, Petitioner, v. Michael B. Mukasey, United States Attorney General, Respondent. Docket Nos. 07-2068-ag(L), 08-1942-ag(CON), 08-1112-ag. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: September 24, 2008.

OPINION The defendant, Gabriel Moreno, appeals from his conviction by a jury in the Providence County Superior Court of the following offenses: kidnapping, felony assault, two counts of simple assault, and interference with the use of a telephone in an emergency. This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument pursuant to an order directing the parties to show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. After

SELYA, Circuit Judge. This case requires us to answer, for the first time, the question of how to determine whether an alien has been convicted of an aggravated felony for purposes of the Immigration & Nationality Act (INA). *50 Following what it termed a “modified categorical a

No. 08-1410-ag Almeida v. Holder UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F OR THE S ECOND C IRCUIT August Term, 2008 (Argued: October 31, 2008 Decided: December 8, 2009) Docket No. 08-1410-ag F ERNANDO F. A LMEIDA, Petitioner,

07-2068-ag(L), 08-1942-ag(CON); 08-1112-ag Alsol v. Mukasey; Powell v. Mukasey 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 _______________ 4 5 August Term, 2008 6 7 (Argued: September 24, 2008 Decided: November 14, 2008) 8 9 Docket Nos. 07-2068-ag(L), 08-1942-ag(CON), 08-1112-ag 10 (consolidated f

Colón Birriel, Juez Ponente *1071TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA RESOLUCIÓN I Carlos J. Pérez Morales (el “señor Pérez Morales”) nos solicita expidamos auto de certiorari y revoquemos una Resolución emitida por el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala de Ponce, Hón. Carmen L. Otero Ferreiras, Juez, el 30 de noviembre de 2007,

FINDINGS AND RULINGS YOUNG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Anonymized minors acting on behalf of a class of approximately 8500 children (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) who, after being removed from their family homes due to abuse or neglect, have suffered harm or are exposed to harm1 in the custody of the Massachusetts Department of Children and F

404 Mass. 400 (1989) 535 N.E.2d 601 COMMONWEALTH vs. LOUIS A. SIGNORINE. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Plymouth. December 5, 1988. March 22, 1989. Present: HENNESSEY, C.J., ABRAMS, NOLAN, LYNCH, & O'CONNOR, JJ. Constance L. Rudnick (Edward R. Gargiulo & Paul Griffin with her) for the defendant. <

736 P.2d 440 (1987) Adam ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jack CIONE, Defendant-Appellee, and John and Jane Does 1-10, Defendants. No. 10805. Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii. January 6, 1987. As Amended January 16, 1987. As Amended January 28, 1987. *442 James T. Leavitt, Jr. (Woodr

Hennessey, J. The defendant was found guilty by a jury of assault and battery with a dangerous weapon. He appeals under G. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33G. We summarize the evidence. The defendant, together with his brothers Robert Kirker and Joseph Kirker, Bruce Kelly and a fifth man, entered an establishment ' called the Strand Cafe in Fall River on the evening of August 5, 1969. Present in the place were George Pac

47 P.3d 1222 (2002) 98 Hawai`i 309 Mary ZANAKIS-PICO and Thomas M. Pico, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. CUTTER DODGE, INC. d/b/a Cutter Dodge Chrysler Plymouth Jeep Eagle, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and Doe Entities 1-10, Defendants. No. 22987. Supreme Court of Hawaii. June 14, 2002. As Amended July 26, 2002.

Cite as 24 I&N Dec. 382 (BIA 2007) Interim Decision #3592 In re Jose Angel CARACHURI-ROSENDO, Respondent File A44 075 911 - Houston Decided December 13, 2007 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) Decisional authority from the Supreme Court and the controlling

16 F.Supp.2d 129 (1998) THE GEORGE HYMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Jackson D. GATEMAN, Anthony M. DeFeo, Charles G. Moretto, Christine Moretto, Calvesco, Inc. and Iron Holdings, Inc., Defendants and Counterclaimants.[1] No. CIV. A. 95-10782-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 2, 1998. *130

615 P.2d 91 (1980) STATE of Hawaii, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rocky Ronald CARABALLO, also known as Rocky Ronald Caravalho, Ronald Valentine Caravalho, Carlos R. Caraballo, Defendant-Appellant, and Daniel Wayne Figueroa and Valentino Buchan, Defendants. No. 6583. Supreme Court of Hawaii. July 15, 1980. *93 Michael K. Tateishi, D

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss, filed November 18, 2016 (Doc. 71)("First JN Motion"); (ii) Defendants' Second Motion for Judicial Notice in Support of the Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Complaint, filed February 23, 2017 (Doc. 91)("Second JN Motion"); (iii) Defendants'

EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO In re: Aprobación del Libro de Instrucciones al Jurado; Agradecimiento al Comité 2022 TSPR 33 para la Revisión del Manual de Instrucciones al Jurado; designación 208 DPR _____ de miembros del Comité Asesor Permanente de Instrucciones al Jurado Número del Caso: EC-2022-01 Fecha: 25 de marzo de 2022 Materia: Resolución del Tribunal. Este documento constituye un documento oficial del Tribunal Supremo q