Cases

STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: * The attorney appointed to represent Juan Manuel Pardo-Pardo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (6th Cir. 2011). Pardo-Pardo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

44 F.3d 1007 U.S.v.Pardo* NO. 94-4631 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Dec 30, 1994 1 Appeal From: S.D.Fla. ,No. 92-00763-CR-LCN 2

Powell, J.: *1190 Francisco Pardo brings this appeal challenging the constitutionality of K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 44-510d(b)(23) as applied to his workers compensation claim. This statute mandates that for all work-related injuries after January 1, 2015, the Sixth Edition of the American Medi

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge EDWARDS. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge: On February 1, 1979, Clifford Corbett, Melvin Bell, Paul Goodwin, Cecil Tate, Six-to Mendoza and Jose Pardo were charged in a two count indictment. Count I charged the defendants with unlawful possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a); Count II charged defendants with unlawful

MEMORANDUM ** Jorge Avena-Pardo appeals from his jury-trial conviction and the 384-month sentence imposed for conspiracy to commit hostage taking and hostage taking, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1203, using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(l)(A)(ii), and harboring illegal aliens for financial gain, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(

MEMORANDUM ** Jorge Avena-Pardo appeals from his jury-trial conviction and the 384-month sentence imposed for conspiracy to commit hostage taking and hostage taking, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1203, using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(l)(A)(ii), and harboring illegal aliens for financial gain, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(l)(

PER CURIAM: * Jose Natividad Gonzalez-Pardo appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction of illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The district court sentenced Gonzalez to 15 months of imprisonment, based in part on a prior illegal reentry conviction. Gonzalez contends that his sentence is illegal under United States v. Boo

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

Sup. Ct. Fla. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Thomas, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 11th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Thomas, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied. Same case below, 587 F.3d 1093.

Petition for rehearing denied. Former decision, 560 U.S. 931, 130 S. Ct. 3334, 176 L. Ed. 2d 1231, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 4305.

401 B.R. 509 (2009) In re Andrew L. PARDO, Debtor. Andrew L. Pardo, Thomas Kendall, Monique Frederique, Nestor Copete, and Peter MacDonald and Josephine MacDonald, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 07-20953-JKO. Adversary No. 08-01138-JKO. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida, Fort Lauderdale Div

229 F.Supp. 473 (1964) UNITED STATES of America, v. Salvador PARDO-BOLLAND, Juan Carlo Arizti and Rene Bruchon, Defendants. United States District Court S. D. New York. May 12, 1964. *474 *475 Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., for the S. D. of New York, New York City, for the United States (William M. Tendy,

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

OPINION OF THE COURT SLOVITER, Chief Judge. Appellant Juan Pardo challenges on four grounds his sentence imposed after a guilty plea to single counts of bank and wire fraud and a count of failure to appear. Two grounds are set forth in his counselled brief, *1189 and two

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 35 Fed. Appx. 387 (first judgment), 388 (third judgment), and 389 (second judgment).

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.