Cases

MEMORANDUM*** Noel Javier Salazar-Parra appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). *262Salazar-Parra seeks to challenge the denial of his motion to suppress statements and evidence in the district court. Howe

Submitted: March 12, 2019 Filed: June 26, 2019 Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied September 3, 2019 Counsel who represented the appellant in 18-2068 was Frederick J. Goetz of Minneapolis, MN. Counsel who represented the appellant in 18-2088 was Gary Wolf of Minneapolis, MN. Counsel who represented the appellant in 18-2090 was Andre

539 U.S. 953 Garza-Hernandezv.United States.Perez-Huertav.United StatesZapata-Martinezv.United StatesSolis-Brionesv.United StatesCarbajal-Taglev.United StatesMartinez-Rodriguezv.United StatesSalinas-Rodriguezv.United StatesCortes-Gallegosv.United StatesMendoza-Martinezv.United StatesHernandez-Hernandezv.United StatesGonzalez-Medra

(Reported below: 61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (67 Fed. Appx. 243);

(Reported below: 61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 920); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (61 Fed. Appx. 922); (61 Fed. Appx. 921); (67 Fed. Appx. 243);

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS ALAN C. KAY, Senior District Judge. For the following reasons, the Court hereby DISMISSES Plaintiffs’ Complaint in its entirety with partial leave to amend, as set out in detail below. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Joe Dettling and Robert Cabos filed their original complaint in this action on June

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: In this case, we must decide whether the district court’s imposition of a condition of supervised release prohibiting the defendant from “residing or going to places where a minor or minors are known to frequent without prior approval of the probation officer” was plainly erroneous. We conclude it was not and AFFIRM.

PER CURIAM: The government appeals from the dismissal of a marijuana indictment. The only issue is whether the district court erred in concluding it lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the vessel was not apprehended in United States custom waters. This circuit has addressed this issue several times since the dismissal of this action. Our decisions indicate the district court applied incorrect law.

793 F.2d 1252 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Carlos BORRERO-GONZALEZ, Jesus Granja-Salazar, JoseVallecilla-Meza, Alcides Parra-Castano, HenryCortez-Perez, and Angel Calimeno-Gomez,Defendants-Appellees. No. 85-5041. United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. July 18, 1986. Sta

MEMORANDUM ** Juan Manuel Gonzalez-Parra appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. *601Gonzalez-Parra contends that the district court erred in sentencing him pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) to more than the two-year maximum set forth

437 F.Supp.2d 1180 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Sac Yarik Francisco VARGAS-ISLAS, Defendant. No. 05-40094-0S-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. June 5, 2006. *1181 David P. Zabel, Office of United States Attorney, Topeka, KS, for Plaintiff. Mary K. Savage, Joseph & Hollander, P.A., Topeka,

UNITED STATES, Appellee V. Toro KHAMSOUK, Ship’s Serviceman Seaman Apprentice U.S. Navy, Appellant No. 01-0387 Crim. App. No. 9900711 United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Argued November 27, 2001 Decided September 20, 2002 BAKER, J., delivered the judgment of the Court. CRAWFORD,

REVISED, May 26, 1998 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________ No. 97-20130 _____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JUAN GARCIA ABREGO, Defendant-Appellant. ______________________________

42 F.Supp.2d 1206 (1999) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Rodolfo MACIAS-TREVISO and, Victor Gallegos-Garcia, Defendants. No. CR 98-297 JP. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. January 6, 1999. *1207 *1208 Paul J. Kennedy, Albuquerque, NM, Joe M. Romero, Jr., Romero & Associ

KING, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant Juan Garcia Abrego appeals his conviction and sentence for ten counts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A), five counts of money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(l)(A)(i); three counts of money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(2)(A), one count of co

38 F.3d 1218NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Issac CERVANTES-PARRA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50068. United State

763 F.Supp. 1208 (1991) UNITED STATES v. Gustavo AGUIRRE-PARRA, Carlos Rodriguez, a/k/a "Federico, or Fred, Ortega-Suarez," Orlando Gill, Fernando Salcedo-Castillo, a/k/a "Coco", and Herman Varela, Defendants. No. 90 Cr. 533 (RPP). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 18, 1991. As Amended May 15, 1991. *12

Opinion HOFFSTADT, J. Plaintiff Edward J. Roberts (plaintiff) enrolled in a private health plan offering benefits to persons 65 and over as well as *137 disabled persons under the federally funded Medicare Advantage program (42 U.S.C. § 1395w-21 et seq.), and went to an urgent c

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (“Agency”) 1 initiated removal proceedings against Carlos Gonzalez in August of 2002 as a result of his conviction in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, for possession of a controlled substance, cocaine. It also placed Mr. Gonzalez in physical

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Sarah A Hall, United States Bankruptcy Judge After considering the pleadings filed, the stipulations contained in the Joint Final *500Pretrial Order [Doe.28], and the evidence and testimony presented at the trial held on March 28, 2016, the Court adopts the following as its findings of fact and con