Cases

Appellate Case: 23-4000 Document: 126-1 Date Filed: 06/10/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH June 10, 2025

ORDER AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge. Defendant’s timely objections [Doc. 37] to the Magistrate Judge’s Final Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) [Doc. 34] regarding Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Statements are currently before the Court. *1347The R & R recommends the denial of Defendant’s motion to suppress

610 F.Supp.2d 1319 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Nicholas F. PECK, Abraham J. Elliott, Levi B. Elliott, Cedric Duane Burks, John P. Guerrero, and Caesar Martinez, Defendants. No. 2:07-CR-173 TS. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. April 20, 2009. *1320 Adam S. Elggren, Michael P. Kennedy, U.S

496 F.3d 885 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Nicholas PECK, Appellant. No. 06-4187. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: June 12, 2006. Filed: August 6, 2007. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied September 10, 2007. *886 Anne M. Laverty, argued, Cedar Rapids,

MEMORANDUM ** Kyle K. Peck appeals from his sentence for bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. We affirm. Peck claims that the district court improperly included all his fraudulently obtained loans in the calculation of the amount of loss, which increased his offense level by nine. See U.S.S.G. § 2Fl.l(b)(l)(J) (2000). He argues that the amount should have been limited to t

ERIC L. CLAY, Circuit Judge, concurring. I agree with the Court’s conclusion and most of its reasoning. I write separately, however, to state that the evidence of Peck’s fraudulent state tax returns was not “inextricably intertwined” with the evidence of his federal tax fraud scheme. As the majority opinion correctly observes, Fed.R.Evid. 404(b) does not apply “when the challenged evidence is ‘inextricably

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 02-2429 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SEAN A. PECK, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois.

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 March 26, 2003 Before Hon. Joel M. Flaum, Chief Judge Hon. John L. Coffey, Circuit Judge Hon. Ann Claire Williams, Circuit Judge No. 02-2429 United States

53 F.3d 1287 U.S.v.Peck** NO. 94-8500 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Apr 25, 1995 Appeal From: N.D.Ga., No. 93-00265-1-CR-1 1 AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1198 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Robert Peck, Jr.

OPINION OF THE COURT LEONARD, Senior Judge: Is the Air Force Form 2030, Drug and Alcohol Abuse Certificate, an individual signs upon entry into the Air Force later *901admissible against him in a court-martial as sentencing evidence to show knowledge of the illegal nature of a drug and the consequences of illegal use? Under the circumstances of this c

992 F.2d 320 U.S.v.Peck NO. 92-1691 United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Mar 15, 1993 1 Appeal From: D.Conn. 2 AFFIRMED.

RULING ON MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL AND STAY OF SENTENCING NEVAS, District Judge. The defendant, Michael A. Peck (“Peck”), brings this motion for a new trial an<3/or to stay his sentencing and further proceedings claiming that the method of petit jury selection used in this case violated his right to a representative jury pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Jury Se

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER REVERSING THE JUDGMENT OF THE MAGISTRATE WINDER, District Judge. This matter is before the court on defendant’s appeal of the Judgment of the magistrate revoking defendant’s probation and sentencing him to thirty days in the Federal Halfway House. A hearing on the appeal was held April 3, 1991. Defendant was represented by Kristine K. Smith. The government was represented by

774 F.2d 1175 U.S.v.Peck 84-3118 United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. 9/26/85 D.Idaho AFFIRMED

DECISION EARLY, Chief Judge: Tried by special court-martial, military judge alone, the accused was convicted, despite his pleas, of five specifications alleging theft of Government property and of violating a lawful general regulation, in violation of Articles 121 and 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 921 and 892. The adjudged' and approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, confineme

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ________________ No. 06-4187 ________________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Nevada denied.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.