Cases

Opinion of the Court Kilday, Judge: In his appeal from a conviction by-general court-martial for wrongful possession of marihuana, the accused reiterates the contentions advanced on his behalf at trial; namely, that the search of his personal belongings, which disclosed his possession of the marihuana, was illegal since it (1) was authorized by a person not empowered to do so and (2) was based on an insufficien

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Office of the New Mexico Director Compilation Commission 2024.12.17

Office of the Director New Mexico Compilation 2022.12.05 Commission '00'07- 09:07:26 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NE

194 S.W.3d 237 (2006) Michael PENMAN, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee. No. 2004-SC-000726-MR. Supreme Court of Kentucky. May 18, 2006. *240 Shelly R. Fears, Emily Holt Rhorer, Department of Public Advocacy, Frankfort, for Appellant. Gregory D. Stumbo, Attorney General of Kentucky, George G. Seelig, Assista

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

OPINION ORME, Judge: Roger Eugene Penman appeals the denial of his motion to withdraw his no-contest plea to one count of manslaughter, a second degree felony in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-205 (1995),1 and his guilty plea to robbery, a second degree felony in violation of Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-301 (1978).2 We affirm, concluding that the requirements o

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

77 F.3d 493 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Rog

TROTT, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I concur in the majority’s opinion, except for the conclusion that plaintiffs do not state a substantive due process claim against Penman and Reed. The majority contends that even if the emergency closures were designed to relocate criminals and reduce urban blight rather than to respond to dangerous housing cod

OPINION FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: Amrut and Sita Patel appeal the jury verdict against them on their § 1983 claim alleging that the City of San Bernardino violated their procedural due process rights by not affording them notice and an opportunity for a hearing after the City closed down their motel as a nuisance. The Patels also appeal the district court’s summary judgment for the City on their § 1983 cla

Opinion by Judge FLETCHER; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Chief Judge WALLACE; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge SCHROEDER; Partial Concurrence by Judge BEEZER. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: This is an interlocutory appeal from the denial of summary judgment to city employees who claim that they are entitled to qualified immunity. The recitation of events below necessarily follows

357 Pa. Superior Ct. 225 (1986) 515 A.2d 948 Cheryl C. PIERCE v. W. Robert PENMAN, M.D. and Dorothy I. Lansing, M.D., Appellants. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 4, 1986. Filed September 29, 1986. *228 Hugh Hutchinson, Philadelphia, for appellants. George A. Brutscher, Kennett Square, fo

886 F.Supp. 824 (1995) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. MOUNTAINEER REFINING COMPANY and Marika Thayer, Defendants. No. 94-CV-0232-J. United States District Court, D. Wyoming. April 24, 1995. *825 Lynn Penman, Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, Carol A. Statkus, Asst. U.S. Atty., Cheyenne, WY, Eduardo Quintana, E.P.A., Denv

Pro Se Plaintiff; Breach of Contract; Motion to Dismiss; Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Privity of Contract; Election of Forum; Statute of Limitations OPINION HORN, J. FINDINGS OF FACT On January 20, 2015, Donald A Woodruff together with The DuckeGroupe, LLC,

MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN LIPTON HOLLANDER, District Judge. On June 26, 2013, a federal grand jury returned a seven-count indictment against *722Lyndon Facisco Miller and Sophia Lorraine Warmington (ECF 12), charging them with conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute one kilogram or more of heroin, five hundred grams or more of

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RAMBO, Chief Judge. Pending before this court is Fairmont Products’ (“Fairmont”) motion for amendment of the findings of fact and conclusions of law, for a new trial, for relief from judgment or for reconsideration. Fairmont’s brief in support of its motion addresses several issues which it believes requires revision to this court’s memorandum and order directing Fairmont t

885 F.Supp. 672 (1994) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. KEYSTONE SANITATION COMPANY, INC.; Kenneth F. Noel, Individually and f/d/b/a Keystone Sanitation Company; Anna M. Noel, Individually and f/d/b/a Keystone Sanitation Company; Arcata Graphics Fairfield, Inc.; C & J Clark, America, Inc.; The Esab Group, Inc.; The Genlyte Group, Inc.; Hanover Bronze and Aluminum Foundry, Inc.; Kemper Industries, Inc.; R.H. Sheppard Company, Inc.; and