⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Pina-Sanchez”

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2007-05-03 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-05-578-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRIST
Supreme Court of the United States · 2006-01-09 · Published · cited 0× · 546 U.S. 1118; 126 S. Ct. 1088; 163 L. Ed. 2d 904; 2006 U.S. LEXIS 383
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021-06-30 · Published · cited 34× · 4 F.4th 1
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 17-1432 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. IDALIA MALDONADO-PEÑA, Defendant, Appellant. No. 17-1551 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. JUAN RIVERA-GEORGE, a/k/a TIO,
District Court, District of Columbia · 2014-12-01 · Published · cited 8× · 75 F. Supp. 3d 101; 2014 WL 6735479; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166156
MEMORANDUM OPINION Re Document No.: 28 RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge Denying Defendant’s Motion to Suppress I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Shantia Hassanshahi is charged with one count of conspiracy to violate the International Economic Emergency Powers Act, 5
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013-12-26 · Published · cited 0× · 738 F.3d 854; 2013 WL 6814704; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 25707
POSNER, Circuit Judge. A commodity pool is an investment fund made up of contributions by a number of different investors. The contributions are commingled and used by the commodity pool operator to buy and sell futures contracts. Because commodity pools are common vehicles for fraud, including Ponzi schemes, the Sentencing Commission has ordained a 4-level guidelines sentencing
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2011-05-18 · Published · cited 1× · 785 F. Supp. 2d 1004; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65791; 2011 WL 2429276
785 F.Supp.2d 1004 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Edward CHRISTY, Defendant. No. CR 10-1534 JB. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. May 18, 2011. *1007 Kenneth J. Gonzales, United States Attorney, Charlyn E. Rees, Holland S. Kastrin, Assistant United States Attorneys, Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiff. <
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013-04-29 · Published · cited 45× · 717 F.3d 1; 2013 WL 1798342
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Following a four-day jury trial, Defendant-Appellant Hipólito Diaz-Arias was found guilty of conspiring to distribute cocaine, in violation of sections 841(a)(1) and 846 of Title 21 of the United States Code. He received a sentence of 120 months’ imprisonment to be followed by a supervised release term of five years. Diaz-Arias now appeals his conviction
District Court, D. Maine · 2007-07-03 · Published · cited 7× · 495 F. Supp. 2d 92; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48842; 2007 WL 1977723
495 F.Supp.2d 92 (2007) UNITED STATES of America v. Cosme Sanchez RAMIREZ, Defendant. No. CR-05-71-B-W. United States District Court, D. Maine. July 3, 2007. *93 David W. Bate, Law Office of David W. Bate, Bangor, ME, for Defendant. F. Todd Lowell, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Bangor, ME, for Plaintiff.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006-12-13 · Published · cited 0× · 212 F. App'x 658
MEMORANDUM*** Francisco Ruiz Martinez, Anthony Zaragoza and Alberto Pina, who were prosecuted for their activities as members of the Columbia Lil’ Cycos (CLCS), appeal their convictions and sentences. Nelson Serrano-Garcia and Hector Rodriguez, also members of CLCS, appeal their sentences only. We affirm the convictions, vacate the sentences of Martinez, Zaragoza and Pina, affirm the sentence of Serrano, a
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005-04-26 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 03-30533 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-02-60101-1- TIMOTHY DEAN SMITH,  ALA Defendant-Appellant. ORDER AND AMENDED  OPINION Appeal from the United
District Court, S.D. New York · 2004-07-08 · Published · cited 9× · 323 F. Supp. 2d 606; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12538; 2004 WL 1520527
323 F.Supp.2d 606 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, v. Martha STEWART and Peter Bacanovic, Defendants. No. 03 CR.717(MGC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. July 8, 2004. *607 *608 Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason & Silberberg, P.C., New York, NY, By: Robert G. Morvillo, John J
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005-07-29 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 03-50244 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-02-01910-IEG JOSE LUIS RIVERA-SILLAS, ORDER Defendant-Appellant. AMENDING  OPINION AND DENYING
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005-08-24 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 03-50244 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-02-01910-IEG JOSE LUIS RIVERA-SILLAS, ORDER AND Defendant-Appellant. AMENDED  OPINION Appeal from the United States District Cour
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001-04-12 · Published · cited 7× · 12 F. App'x 253
PER CURIAM. Defendant Christopher Alsop appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to distribute cocaine and multiple counts of distribution of cocaine. Defendant was indicted on October 21, 1998, in a four-count indictment for conspiracy to distribute cocaine base (crack) pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 846, and for unlawful distribution of crack cocaine pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(iii) and (b)(l)(B)(iii).
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004-12-03 · Published · cited 75× · 390 F.3d 661; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 24916; 2004 WL 2756804
WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge. Smith appeals from his sentence because of the enhancement imposed by the district court pursuant to the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). He contends the district court improperly relied on statements made at a no contest plea hearing in concluding that an earlier state burglary conviction qualifies as a “violent felony” for pu
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005-07-29 · Published · cited 31× · 417 F.3d 1014; 2005 WL 1792033
ORDER Our opinion filed on July 15, 2004, and published at 376 F.3d 887, is AMENDED as follows: We withdraw the content of the paragraph on page 893 beginning with “Rivera-Sillas contends that if the Government need not prove that a defendant has knowledge of his presence in the United States, ...” and substitute the following paragraph in its place:
District Court, D. Utah · 1997-12-23 · Published · cited 0× · 987 F. Supp. 1345; 1997 WL 790569
987 F.Supp. 1345 (1997) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Randy Lee BECKWITH, Defendant. No. 97-CR-176 K. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. December 23, 1997. *1346 Laurie J. Sartorio, Asst. U.S. Attorney, Salt Lake City, UT, for Plaintiff. Randy Lee Beckwith, Salt Lake City, UT, pro se.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004-07-15 · Published · cited 11× · 376 F.3d 887; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 14606; 2004 WL 1575246
T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge: Jose Luis Rivera-Sillas appeals the district court’s denial of his motions to dismiss his underlying indictment. We hold that the district court correctly denied Rivera-Sillas’s motions, and we affirm. *889 I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006-01-06 · Published · cited 218× · 433 F.3d 273; 69 Fed. R. Serv. 185; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 271
HALL, Circuit Judge. Defendants Martha Stewart and Peter Bacanovic appeal from the final judgments of conviction entered July 20, 2004 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Following trial before the Honorable Miriam Goldman Cedarbaum, the jury found Stewart and Bacanovic guilty of conspiracy, concealing material information from and making f
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994-10-26 · Published · cited 96× · 40 F.3d 1306; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 29961
STAHL, Circuit Judge. Following a seventeen-day criminal trial, defendants Francis Bonasia, Ralph DeMasi, Ronald Martel, and Robert Papa were convicted by a jury of various charges stemming from the attempted armed robbery of a Brink’s armored truck. On appeal, DeMasi, *1310Martel, and Papa together, and Bonasia individually, raise a series of issues including deni