Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Porter”
United States v. Porterpublic domain
Case: 21-10817 Document: 00516421458 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/05/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 5, 2022
United States v. Porterpublic domain
MATHESON, Circuit Judge. Mark Olic Porter shouted racial epithets at Lucas Waldvogel, a seven-year-old African American who lived in Mr. Porter's apartment complex. After hearing Mr. Porter's language, the boy's father, Michael Waldvogel, confronted Mr. Porter, who then assaulted Mr. Waldvogel with a stun cane. Shortly thereafter, Mr. Waldvogel and his family moved out of the complex.
United States v. Porterpublic domain
O'BRIEN, Circuit Judge. Between 2006 and 2010, Shannon Porter used the TurboTax software program to electronically file 123 false tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) requesting $357,361 in refunds. The returns contained accurate taxpayer identification information which Porter either stole or purchased from the taxpayer or a third party. However, the returns falsely reported the taxpayer to be self-employed
United States v. Porterpublic domain
PER CURIAM: The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be.enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Grinard-Henry, 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of
United States v. Porterpublic domain
Case: 25-60163 Document: 89-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/17/2026 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 25-60163 FILED
United States v. Porterpublic domain
Robert Porter, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's judgment of conviction. The parties have waived oral argument, and this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a). In 2016, a federal grand jury returned a superseding indictment charging Porter with three counts of theft concerning programs receiving federal funds, in violation of
United States v. Porterpublic domain
HOLMES, Circuit Judge. Following a jury trial, Defendanb-Appel-lant Gloria Porter was convicted of 105 counts of wire fraud, one count of mail fraud, and one count of identity theft. Ms. Porter appeals her convictions, claiming that the district court incorrectly instructed the jury with respect to aggravated identity theft and that the evidence was insufficient to support her c
United States v. Porterpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Gregory Lavon Porter appeals the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Porterpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Contrary to Appellee’s pleas, a military judge, sitting as a special court-martial, found Appellee guilty of one specification of wrongful use of cocaine and one specification of wrongful use of marijuana in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 912a (2006). The adjudged and approved sentence included ninety days’ confinement
United States v. Porterpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Lorenza Porter appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United Stat
United States v. Porterpublic domain
CCA 201100188. Notice is hereby given that a certificate for review of the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals was filed under Rule 22 this date on the following issues: *371I. THE ENTRIES ON PAGES 54 AND 154 OF PROSECUTION EXHIBIT 15 THAT NMCCA FOUND TO BE TESTIMONIAL HEARSAY WERE NEITHER MADE WITH THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF PROVING PAST
United States v. Porterpublic domain
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Terry L. Porter seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of
United States v. Porterpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Lorenza Porter appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 8582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States
United States v. Porterpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) Criminal No. 04-361-01 (ESH) ) ORLANDO PORTER, )
United States v. Porterpublic domain
ORDER While on supervision for a state offense, Gerard Porter arranged by telephone to sell heroin to an informant working with the Drug Enforcement Administration. Agents arrested Porter when he arrived to complete the sale, and a search of his car revealed heroin and cash. Porter’s girlfriend consented to a search of her apartment, where Porter stayed several nights a week. In a bedroom closet agents located a loaded handgun and amm
United States v. Porterpublic domain
ORDER Charles Edward Porter pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court sentenced Porter to 21 months’ imprisonment, the high end of the guidelines range. On appeal, Porter argues that the district court did not adequately consider whether his limited possession of the gun warranted a shorter sentence. We affirm. In 2008 Porter was charged in In
United States v. Porterpublic domain
594 F.3d 1251 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph Fleming PORTER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-4158. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. February 9, 2010. *1253 Diana Hagen, Assistant United States Attorney (Brett L. Toman, United States Attorney, on the briefs), Salt Lake City, UT, for Plaint
United States v. Porterpublic domain
654 F.Supp.2d 938 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. Noel PORTER, Defendant. Case No. 4:08-CR-00337 BSM. United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Little Rock Division. September 16, 2009. Michael S. Gordon, U.S. Attorney's Office, Little Rock, AR, for Plaintiff. *939 Omar F. Greene, II, Federal Public Defend
United States v. Porterpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Emjadia Porter appeals the district court’s orders granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reaso
United States v. Porterpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT CHAGARES, Circuit Judge. Counsel for Frank Porter has moved, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), for permission to withdraw as counsel in this case. For the reasons that follow, we will grant the motion and affirm Porter’s conviction and sentence.1