Cases

PER CURIAM: The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Prieto’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Grinard-Henry, 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of the

KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. The criminal prosecution giving rise to this appeal stems from a so-called mortgage rescue program organized and operated by Michael Prieto. In brief, Prieto’s organization garnered large sums of money, while homeowners, sham buyers, and lenders to whom Prieto and his operatives made a series of false representations ended up with substantial losses and lia

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Angel Alberto Prieto-Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Prieto-Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portion

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Francisco Prieto-Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Prieto-Garcia has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Maurilio Prieto-Rubi appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis because he remains in federal custody. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Pr

549 F.3d 513 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas PRIETO and Fernando Sanz, a/k/a Julio Castro-Cardenas, a/k/a Nicolas Cardenas, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 07-3484, 07-3485. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 4, 2008. Decided December 2, 2008. *515 Thomas

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Prieto was convicted of trafficking methamphetamine and cocaine and was sentenced to 188 months in prison. He appeals his conviction on three evidentiary grounds. First, he claims that the district court wrongly denied his motion to suppress a pouch of drugs discovered on his person when a security guard searched him at the Kona Family Court building on June 9, 2003. The district court d

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 07-3484 & 07-3485 U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. T HOMAS P RIETO and F ERNANDO S ANZ, a/k/a Julio Castro-Cardenas, a/k/a Nicolas Cardenas, Defendants-Appellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Norther

MEMORANDUM** Neponuceno Prieto-Torres appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). Prieto-Torres, who was sentenced under the mandatory Sentencing Guidelines before the Supreme Court its issued its decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT NOV - 6 2000

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Albverto PRIETO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 98-5169. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Nov. 6, 2000. Appeal from the

MEMORANDUM** On May 19, 2000, Juan Prieto-Romero pled guilty under a written Plea Agreement to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1). As agreed in the Plea Agreement, he received a five-year custodial sentence followed by three years of supervised release. On appeal, Prieto-Romero argues that (1) the

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Prieto-Vega appeals his conviction by guilty plea and sentence for one count of importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. Prieto-Viega’s contention that he was indicted, convicted, and sentenced pursuant to unconstitutional statutes is foreclosed by United States v. Mendoza-Paz, 286 F.3d 1104, 1109-119 (9th Cir.2002), and United States v. Varelar-Ri

MEMORANDUM ** Federal prisoner Rodrigo Prieto-Moreno appeals the thirty month sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction of conspiracy to possess marijuana with the intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846, and possession of marijuana with the intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm.

103 F.Supp.2d 1292 (2000) UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. Juan Ramon PRIETO-ZUBIA, Jamie Alonso Lujan-Ramirez, Defendants. Nos. CRIM.A00-20055-01KHV, CRIM.A00-20055-02KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. June 27, 2000. Brent I. Anderson, Office of United States Attorney, Kansas City, KS, for U.S. Charles D. Dedmon, Office of Federal Public, William F. D

108 F.3d 342 U.S.v.Prieto* NO. 95-5193 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Feb 13, 1997 1 Appeal From: S.D.Fla. , No. 95-00111-CR-CCA 2

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-3070 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROBERTO PRIETO, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Norther

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-589 Filed: April 27, 2022 ) ALVER VALLES-PRIETO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. )

19 F.3d 16 U.S.v.Prieto* NO. 93-09072 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Mar 16, 1994 1 Appeal From: N.D.Tex. 2 A

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.