Cases

355 N.W.2d 195 (1984) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Larry PROPOTNIK, Appellant. No. C9-84-104. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. September 25, 1984. Review Denied December 20, 1984. *197 Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Thomas L. Johnson, Hennepin County Atty., Vernon E. Bergstrom, Chief, Appellate Section,

216 N.W.2d 637 (1974) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Larry Russell PROPOTNIK, Appellant. No. 43825. Supreme Court of Minnesota. March 22, 1974. C. Paul Jones, Public Defender, David Essling, Asst. Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant. Warren Spannaus, Atty. Gen., Jonathan H. Morgan, Sol. Gen., Robert F. Carolan, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Atte

PER CURIAM. Larry R. Propotnik appeals from the dismissal of his habeas corpus petition for lack of personal jurisdiction. We affirm. Propotnik was convicted in 1973 in the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota of a firearms violation and was sentenced to a term of three years in prison. He was incarcerated in the federal prison a

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER NEESE, District Judge. The movant Mr. Theodore G. Fore, a prisoner in custody under sentences of July 6, 1968 of this Court in United States of America, plaintiff, v. George Martin Monroe, et al., defendants, criminal actions nos. 6958, 6961, this district and division, claims the right to be released immediately, on the ground that he has fully' served the s

LILLEHAUG, Justice (dissenting). As the majority acknowledges, the district court “contravened an unambiguous rule of criminal procedure” when it failed to advise Clarence Bruce Beaulieu of his constitutional rights before it revoked his probation and executed his prison sentence. In the aftermath of this error, the parties presented and argued three issues: (1) whether Beaulieu had a constitutional right “to be

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A24-0818 Court of Appeals Hennesy, J. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Filed: May 6, 2026 Office of Appellate Courts Alfredo

Case: 18-40044 Document: 00514935765 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/30/2019 REVISED April 30, 2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 26, 2019

OPINION ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice. Samantha Heiges was arrested and charged with second-degree murder and *4first-degree manslaughter for allegedly drowning her baby daughter in a bathtub immediately after the baby was born. A Dakota County jury found Heiges guilty of second-degree murder and the Dakota County District Court convicted Heiges of this of

654 N.W.2d 700 (2002) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Liza Marie GOEBEL, Appellant. No. C4-02-558. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. December 24, 2002. *701 Mike Hatch, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Doug Johnson, Washington County Attorney, Kari A. Lindstrom, Assistant County Attorney, Stillwater, MN, for respondent.

OPINION SCHELLHAS, Judge. Relator challenges the City of Lino Lakes City Council’s order for the destruction of his dog after its declaration as a dangerous animal under the Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances. Because the city’s declaration of the dog as a dangerous animal is predicated on the dog’s earlier declaration as a potentially dangerous animal, which the city’s ordinance provided no

366 N.W.2d 721 (1985) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Gary Seth PACKARD, Appellant. No. C8-84-1499. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. May 7, 1985. Review Denied July 17, 1985. *723 Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Thomas L. Johnson, Hennepin County Atty., Vernon E. Bergstrom, Chief, Appellate Sectio

Grimes, J., dissenting: On the two points relied on in the motion to withdraw the guilty plea, the record is barren as to the defendant’s actual understanding. Nowhere in the document defendant signed or in the record is it stated what the maximum and minimum penalties were. Nor is it stated with what crime he was charged or the elements the State would have to prov

PER CURIAM. Jack Rheuark appeals from the dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We affirm. In 1975 Rheuark was convicted and sentenced in Texas for armed robbery. He is presently incarcerated in the Ellis Unit of the Texas Department of Corrections. In May

OPINION OF THE COURT Richard J. Goldman, J. Defendant moves to controvert the second felony statement filed by the District Attorney. Defendant has been indicted for robbery in the second degree (four counts), grand larceny in the third degree, criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, robbery in the second degree (two counts), criminal use of a firearm in the second degree, criminal possession of a w

331 N.W.2d 901 (1983) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Paul Richard NORDSTROM, Appellant. No. C0-82-1069. Supreme Court of Minnesota. March 25, 1983. *902 O'Brien, Ehrick, Wolf, Deaner & Downing and Charles F. Richards, Rochester, for appellant. Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., and Norman B. Coleman, Jr., Sp. Ass

Holmes, J. This cause presents a recurring question of what is required of a trial judge when accepting a guilty plea or a plea of no contest from a criminal defendant. Here, the appellant challenges the validity of his guilty plea because of the trial court’s alleged failure to inform him that by pleading guilty he was waiving his right to a trial by jury. Appellant, in effect, argues that the trial court did not comply in this

470 F.Supp. 1230 (1979) Anthony AUGELLO, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, METROPOLITAN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, and United States Parole Commission, George Doerbecker and James Stein, Respondents. No. 79 C 967. United States District Court, E. D. New York. May 24, 1979. *1231 Zerin & Cooper, New York City,

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 682 Syllabus by the Court 1. Before a guilty plea may be accepted it must be established that a factual basis exists for concluding that the defendant actually committed an offense at least as serious as the degree of the crime to which he pled guilty. Under the circumstances surroundi

*104Digges, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. Murphy, C. J., and Eldridge, J., concur in the judgment and Murphy, C. J., filed a concurring opinion in which Eldridge, J., concurs at page 119 infra. Generally speaking, this case involves the question of what information the due process clause o

Rossi v. Pelham CV-96-139-SD 09/29/97 P UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Cheryl B. Rossi v. Civil No. 96-139-SD Town of Pelham; Peter R. Flynn, individually and in his capacity as Pelham Administrative Ass't; Paul R. Scott, individually and in his capacity as Vice- Chairman of the Pelham Bd. of Selectmen; David Rowell, individually and in his capacity as Pelham P