Cases

505 F.3d 377 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Benjamin PUCKETT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-10543. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. October 23, 2007. *378 *379 *380 Renee Harris Toliver (argued), Fort Worth, TX, Su

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 05a0377p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, -

OPINION OF THE COURT GENT, Judge: A general court-martial composed of officer members found the appellant guilty, contrary to his pleas, of possessing child pornography on divers occasions, in violation of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The adjudged and approved sentence was a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 3 months, and reduction to E-3. The appellant assigns four errors for our considera

This is a direct appeal from a judgment and commitment order in a criminal prosecution in which counsel for the appellant moves to withdraw from representation on appeal. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). In 2000, Jeremy Puckett was indicted in connection with th

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 03-3832 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAWON D. PUCKETT, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Il

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1293 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Billy Puckett Defendant

BAUM, Chief Judge: At a trial held on 12 June 1989 and 24, 25 and 28 July 1989, appellant pled not guilty to numerous drug related offenses before a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members. Despite his pleas, the Court convicted appellant of eleven specifications of wrongful use of marijuana under Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 912a and four specifications of failure

PER CURIAM. Robert Eugene Puckett pleaded guilty to one count of knowingly failing to register as a sex offender, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250 (a). The district court 1 senten

SILER, Circuit Judge, dissenting. As seen from the majority opinion, very few cases have discussed this dilemma. It would have been easy for the prosecution to have charged the defendant with mail or wire fraud before the statute of limitations expired, but it was not effected for some reason. Now, we must decide whether the conduct by defendants amounted to a violation of the bank fraud statute. I think it did and I would affirm t

718 F.2d 1101 U. S.v.Puckett 81-5836 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 8/1/83 1 E.D.Tenn. REMANDED

708 F.2d 730 U. S.v.Puckett 81-5384 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 12/20/82 1 E.D.Tenn. AFFIRMED

573 F.Supp. 713 (1981) UNITED STATES of America, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Acie E. PUCKETT, etc., Defendant. No. CIV-4-81-50. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Winchester Division. September 4, 1981. On Subsequent Enforcement June 4, 1982. John H. Cary, U.S. Atty., Knoxville, Tenn., by John C. Cook, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chattanooga, Tenn., for

701 F.2d 182 U. S.v.Puckett 81-5836 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 3/12/82 1 E.D.Tenn. APPEAL DISMISSED

*131 Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court. The question presented by this case is whether a forfeited claim that the Government has violated the terms of a plea agreement is subject to the plain-error standard of review set forth in Rule 52(b) of the Federal Rules of Crim

622 F.2d 588 U. S.v.Puckett 78-5127 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fourth Circuit 5/6/80 1 E.D.N.C. AFFIRMED

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

FULTON, Judge (concurring): I concur. I am unable to make the fine distinctions my brother Wray makes between the 90-day Burton rule and the 90-day Dunlap rule. Also, it seems clear to me that Goode provides for waiver of errors in the written staff judge advocate’s review and does not provide for waiver of substantive errors occurring outside the review.

ROGERS, Circuit Judge, dissenting. Although I concur with the court’s decision in Parts I through III, I respectfully dissent from its decision not to remand. The holding in United States v. Justin Jones does not, in my view, preclude reasonableness review of aspects of the sentencing determination other than whether a departure is permitted (and the extent to which a departure is permitted) under the p

474 F.2d 1337 U. S.v.Puckett 72-1283 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit 11/30/72 1 E.D.Pa. AFFIRMED

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. George E. Puckett entered a conditional guilty plea to a charge of being a felon in possession of a firearm. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2) (2000). He reserved the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress and now exercises that right. Relying on Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 5