Cases

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before GASTON, DEERWESTER, and MYERS Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Travis M. QUINN Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corp

Case: 19-30591 Document: 00515557271 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/09/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 19-30591 FILED

PER CURIAM: Anthony Allen Quinn appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. R.Crim. 35(b) motion and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Quinn, No. 1:01-cr-00089-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 18, 2011; filed Nov. 21, 2011 & entered No

CCA S31747. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to October 17, 2011.

576 F.3d 292 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James QUINN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-6217. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Submitted: July 29, 2009. Decided and Filed: August 6, 2009. ON BRIEF: Frank W. Heft, Jr., Patrick J. Bouldin, Office Of The Federal Defender, Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellant.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Anthony Allen Quinn appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing to adjudicate the validity of his guilty plea. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Anthony Allen Quinn appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing to adjudicate the validity of his guilty plea. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

PER CURIAM: This court sua sponte vacates and withdraws its previous opinion in this case. The panel will hold decision in this case in abeyance pending the resolution of United States v. Davis, No. 08-12321, which is scheduled for oral argument on February 4, 2009.

PER CURIAM: This court sua sponte vacates and withdraws its previous opinion in this case. The panel will hold decision in this case in abeyance pending the resolution of United States v. Davis, No. 08-12321, which is scheduled for oral argument on February 4, 2009.

537 F.Supp.2d 99 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, v. Robert E. QUINN, Defendant. Criminal No. 05-0018(JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 28, 2008. *102 Jay I. Bratt, Laura A. Ingersoll, Margaret J. Chriss, U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. *

MEMORANDUM * Steven Quinn appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of transportation of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a). We affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recite them here. Quinn claims that his five-year mandatory minimum sentence violated the principles of federalism because the statute incorporated a state mis

472 F.Supp.2d 104 (2007) UNITED STATES of America v. Jeremy QUINN, Defendant. Criminal No. 06-10165-GAO. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. February 6, 2007. *105 George W. Vien, United States Attorney's Office Boston, MA, for United States of America. MEMORANDUM O'TOOLE, District Judge

416 F.Supp.2d 133 (2006) UNITED STATES of America v. Robert E. QUINN, Defendant. No. CRIM.05-0018(JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 28, 2006. *134 Jay I. Bratt, Laura A. Ingersoll, Office of the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Washington, Counsel for the United States. Aitan Dro

401 F.Supp.2d 80 (2005) UNITED STATES of America v. Robert E. QUINN, Michael H. Holland, Mohammed A. Sharbaf, Defendants. No. CRIM. 05-0018(JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 21, 2005. Amended November 23, 2005. *81 *82 Jay I. Bratt, Laura A. Ing

403 F.Supp.2d 57 (2005) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Robert E. QUINN, Michael H. Holland, Mohammed A. Sharbaf Defendants. No. CRIM.05-0018 JDB. United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 5, 2005. *58 *59 Jay I. Bratt, Laura A. Ingersoll, Office of the U.S. Attorney for the Dis

PER CURIAM. Melvin Quinn was convicted of one count of knowingly and intentionally distributing five grams or more of cocaine base, a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. He appeals from the sentence imposed upon him by the district court.1 We affirm.2 I. Section 841(b)(1)(B) of Title 21 provides that an individual convicted of distributin

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 23, 2007 Decided January 26, 2007 No. 06-3058 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. ROBERT E. QUINN, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 05cr00018-01)

ROLPH, Chief Judge: A military judge sitting as a special court-martial convicted the appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of failure to go to his appointed place of duty, making a false official statement, wrongful destruction of non-military property, larceny, and fleeing the scene of an accident. The appellant’s conduct violated Articles 86, 107, 109, 121, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886, 907, 909

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  No. 02-4753 CLIFFORD J. QUINN, Defendant-Appellant.  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  No. 02-4762 JAN P. BLANTON,

5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21 3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH  (/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU )LOH 1DPH DS 81,7('67$7(6&28572)$33($/6 )257+(6,;7+&,5&8,7 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 81,7(' 67$7(6 2) $0(5,&$ ; 3ODLQWLII$SSHOOHH    1R Y