Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1507 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ELIEZER ROSARIO-RAMOS, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Aida M. Delgado-Colón, U.S. District Judge]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1857 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. NYCOLE AMAURY ROSARIO SÁNCHEZ, t/n Nyckole Amaury Rosario Sánchez, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa,

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1642 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. JOHN DERICK ROSARIO-MERCED, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]

18-2739 (L) United States v. Rosario 1 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 for the Second Circuit 4 5 August Term, 2019 6 7 (Argued: November 5, 2019 8 Final Submission: August 24, 2020 9 Decided: July 29, 2021) 10 11 Docket Nos. 18-2739, 20-

17-3904-cr United States v. Rosario Ventura United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2022 (Argued: June 26, 2023 Decided: March 22, 2024) Docket No. 17-3904-cr _____________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appella

18-1994-cr(L) United States v. Rosario 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 August Term, 2020 5 6 (Argued: December 2, 2020 Decided: February 23, 2021) 7 8 Docket Nos. 18-1994-cr(L), 19-2399(CON) 9 10 _____________________________________ 11 12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Judge SPARKS delivered the opinion of the Court, Contrary to his pleas, Appellant was convicted by a special court-martial with members of one specification of violating a general order (Marine Corps Order 1000.9A) by sexually harassing Lance Corporal (LCpl) B.A on divers occasions, in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 20-1275, 20-1276, 20-1283 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. EDUARDO ROSARIO-ORANGEL, a/k/a Barba, a/k/a Cholon; AVELINO MILLÁN-MACHUCA, a/k/a Papito Machuca, a/k/a El Fuerte, a/k/a Viejo, a/k/a Gordo; LUIS H. QUIÑONES-SANTIAGO, a/k/a Hiram, Defendants, Appellants. APP

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before J.A. FISCHER, A.C. RUGH, T.H. CAMPBELL Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARK J. ROSARIO SERGEANT (E-5), U.

FRANCISCO A. BESOSA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is defendant Wilfredo Rosario-Camacho's ("Rosario")1 motion to withdraw his guilty plea. (Docket Nos. 4729 and 4911.) Defendant Rosario alleges, inter alia , that this Court participated in plea negotiations contrary to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1) (" Rule 11"). (Docket Nos. 4911 and 4928.) Consequently, defendant

OMNIBUS OPINION AND ORDER DANIEL R. DOMÍNGUEZ, District Judge. Pending before the Court are: (a) Motion for Acquittal under Rule 29(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, filed by defendant Alejandro Martinez Martínez (“Martinez”), Docket No. 93; (b) Joint Motion for Acquittal Pursuant to Rule 29 and Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, filed by defendant Paolo Rosario (“R

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C. Before J.R. MCFARLANE, K.M. MCDONALD, M.C. HOLIFIELD Appellate Military Judges UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HALEY E. ROSARIO CRYPTOLOGIC TECHNICIAN (COLLECTION) SEAMAN (E-3), U.S. NAVY NMCCA 201400176

CCA 201200502. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 6,2014.

OPINION & ORDER DANIEL R. DOMÍNGUEZ, United States District Judge The right to remain silent is a cornerstone of our constitutional configuration. The Supreme Court deems this right to be so essential that a police officer is required to inform individuals of its existence prior to subjecting them to a custodial interrogation. Once invoked, the right to silence cannot be taken lightly — the interrogatio

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTION IN LIMINE ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge. Vivian A. Rosario is charged with Unlawful Possession with Intent to Distribute 28 Grams or More of Cocaine Base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(l)(B)(iii), and Unlawful Possession with Intent to Distribute Cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. The Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to a public trial, and “without exception all courts have held that an accused is at the very least entitled to have his friends, relatives and counsel present, no matter with what offense he may be charged.” In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 271-72, 68 S.Ct. 499, 92 L.Ed. 682 (1948). We have repeatedl

OPINION SESSIONS, District Judge: Defendant-appellant Rosario Vazquez-Hernandez appeals his conviction for attempted illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 on the ground that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. Vazquez-Hernandez also notes that the district court’s instruction at trial failed to properly inform the jury of the es

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Carlos Rosario-Ramos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Rosario-Ramos has not filed a- response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the re

810 F.Supp.2d 375 (2011) UNITED STATES of America v. Jimmy Roman ROSARIO, Defendant. No. 09-cr-30007-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 8, 2011. *378 Paul H. Smyth, Todd E. Newhouse, U.S. Attorney's Office, Springfield, MA, for United States of America. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDIN

746 F.Supp.2d 349 (2010) UNITED STATES of America v. Jimmy Roman ROSARIO, Defendant. No. 09-CR-30007-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. October 26, 2010. Syrie D. Fried, Federal Public Defender Office, Boston, MA, Joseph F. Krowski, Sr., Joseph F. Krowski Law, Brockton, MA, for Defendant. Todd E. Newhouse, United States Attorney's Office Uni