Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Ram”
United States v. Rampublic domain
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Moorthy Srinivasan Ram seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2013) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A
United States v. Ram Kumar Singhpublic domain
*759 RICHARD MILLS, District Judge: Posit: In order for a defendant to receive a two-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2F1,1(b)(6)(B), must the defendant personally commit a substantial part of the fraudulent scheme from outside of the United States? We t
Ram v. United Statespublic domain
Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing denied.
Ram v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
United States v. Ram Singhpublic domain
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing by published opinion. Judge WILLIAMS wrote the opinion, in which Judge LUTTIG and Judge OSTEEN joined. OPINION WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: In October 1993, a jury in the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia convicted Dr. Ram Singh of dis
Ram v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
United States v. Ram Lachmanpublic domain
ORDER The petition for rehearing filed December 8, 1986, is granted. No additional briefing or argument is required. The order filed November 4, 1986, is withdrawn. The order to show cause is discharged. The suggestion of appropriateness of rehearing en banc filed December 8, 1986, is dismissed as moot.
Ram v. United Statespublic domain
Case below, 548 Fed.Appx. 904.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
RAM Energy, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION BRUGGINK, Judge. This is a contract action brought by a part owner of a government-issued offshore oil and gas lease. In a related action, we previously held that the government committed a total breach of this and other related lease contracts. See Amber Res. Co. v. United States, 68 Fed.Cl. 535 (2005) (“Amber 1 ”). Co-owners of the other leases sought restitution in lieu of los
OPINION MARY D. FRANCE, Chief Judge. Before the Court is the motion of Hari Ram, Inc., (“Debtor”) for the use of cash collateral (the “Motion”). Debtor concedes that Magnolia Portfolio, LLC (“Magnolia”) holds a mortgage and is perfected by an assignment of rents and a UCC financing statement. Debtor asserts, however, that the hotel room revenues are property of the estate and that it has offered t
Ram v. Cooperpublic domain
Ct. App. Cal., 5th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Ram v. Cooperpublic domain
Ct. App. Cal., 5th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Ram Et Ux. v. Cooperpublic domain
540 U.S. 822 RAM ET UX.v.COOPER. No. 02-1806. Supreme Court of United States. October 6, 2003. 1 Appeal from the Ct. App. Cal., 5th App. Dist. 2 Certiorari denied.
RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judge: Anant Ram, his wife, Nazra Bibi Ram, and their daughter, Sangeeta Ram (collectively, “Petitioners”) petition for review of their final order of deportation entered by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) *512 on June 29,1999. Petitioners contend that they were eli
Silva v. Rampublic domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
United States v. Forfeiture/1985 Dodge Rampublic domain
959 F.2d 967 U.S.v.Forfeiture/1985 Dodge Ram* NO. 91-1892 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Mar 27, 1992 1 Appeal From: N.D.Tex. 2
Ram v. De Galanpublic domain
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
962 F.2d 9 U.S.v.Forfeiture/1985 Dodge Ram Pickup, Knapp (Amy) NO. 91-1892 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Apr 27, 1992 N.D.Tex., 959 F.2d 967 1 DENIALS OF REHEARING EN BANC.
Marshall v. Chrysler Dodge Jeep Rampublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TAMIKA BENSON MARSHALL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-02368 (UNA) ) CHRYSLER DODGE JEEP RAM, et al.,
United States v. Haigler (Eddie), A/K/A Rampublic domain
934 F.2d 320 U.S.v.Haigler (Eddie), a/k/a Ram NO. 90-5322 United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. MAY 28, 1991 1 Appeal From: D.S.C. 2 AFFIRMED IN PART, REMANDED IN PAR