⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

7 opinions for “United States v. Ramesh Balwani”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-02-24 · Published · cited 5× · 129 F.4th 636
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-10312 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 5:18-cr-00258- v. EJD-1 ELIZABETH A. HOLMES, OPINION Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-10338 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-12-22 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-10312 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 5:18-cr-00258- v. EJD-1 ELIZABETH A. HOLMES, ORDER AND AMENDED Defendant-Appellant. OPINION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-10338 Plaintiff-Appellee,
Illinois Supreme Court · 2024-03-21 · Published · cited 14× · 2024 IL 129227
2024 IL 129227 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 129227) PROJECT44, INC., Appellee, v. FOURKITES, INC., Appellant. Opinion filed March 21, 2024.
Illinois Supreme Court · 2024-03-21 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 IL 129227
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest Illinois Official Reports to the accuracy
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2018-04-23 · Published · cited 0×
EFiled: Apr 23 2018 08:00AM EDT Transaction ID 61943412 Case No. 12816-VCL IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE PARTNER INVESTMENTS, L.P., a ) Delaware limited partnership, PFM ) HEALTHCARE MASTER FUND, L.P., A ) Cayman Islands limi
District Court, D. Arizona · 2018-04-10 · Published · cited 4× · 308 F. Supp. 3d 1026
H. Russel Holland, United States District Judge Motions to Dismiss Defendants move to dismiss plaintiffs' second amended consolidated class action complaint.1 These motions are opposed.2 Oral argument was requested and has been heard. Background Plaintiffs are A.R., B.B., B.P., D.L., L.M., M.P., R.C., R.G., S.
District Court, D. Arizona · 2017-06-13 · Published · cited 13× · 256 F. Supp. 3d 1009; 2017 WL 2556763; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90965
*1019ORDER H. Russel Holland, United States District Judge Motions to Dismiss Defendants move to dismiss plaintiffs’ first amended consolidated class action complaint.1 The motions to dismiss are opposed.2 Oral argument was not requested and is not deemed necessary.<