Cases

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. RICARDO CORREA (SC 20246) Robinson, C. J., and Palmer, McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn and Ecker, Js.* Syllabus The defendant was convicted, following a conditional plea of nolo conten- dere, of the crimes of conspiracy to possess a controlled substance with intent to sell, conspiracy to possess narcotics with intent to sell by a person who is not drug-dependent, and cons

517 F.3d 904 (2008) Francisco RAMIREZ-CANALES (05-4504); Jose Luis Garcia Correa (06-3990), Petitioners, v. Michael MUKASEY, Respondent. Nos. 05-4504, 06-3990. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: October 23, 2007. Decided and Filed: February 27, 2008. *905 *906

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. After a jury convicted Defendants-Appellants José Laureano-Salgado, Pedro Ramirez-Rivera, and Ismael Cruz-Ramos (collectively, “the Defendants”) 1 of *12 numerous drug and gun crimes, a district court judge sentenced t

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 30, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-12-01050-CV JORGE CORREA AND FELIX RAMIREZ, Appellants V. HOUSTON SURGICAL ASSISTANT SERVICES, INC, Appellee On Appeal from the 165th District Court Harris County, Texas

OPINION AND ORDER1 BESOSA, District Judge. Plaintiff Luz Pizarro-Correa (“Pizarro”) brought this action against the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Department; also known as Departamento de Hacienda (“Hacienda”), the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“Commonwealth”), and Alberto Cardona-Crespo (“Cardona”) (collectively “defendants”) alleging violations of the Americans with Disabiliti

ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On

540 U.S. 1012 AZANON-RODASv.UNITED STATESMERCADO-VARGAS, AKA BERRONES VARGAS, AKA PEREZv.UNITED STATESMOLINA-RODRIGUEZv.UNITED STATESNUNEZ-VILLAv.UNITED STATESORTIZ-RAMIREZv.UNITED STATESPACHECO-HERRERAv.UNITED STATESRAMIREZ-BOVADILLA, AKA CORREA-ESQUIVELv.UNITED STATESSEGURA-CARRERAv.UNITED STATESCISNEROS-PEREZv.UNITED STATESGUARDIOLA-SALAS<

(Reported below: 73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 82);

(Reported below: 73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 82);

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1938 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. KELECHI COLLINS UMEH, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1685 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. DOMINICK BAILEY, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Nathaniel M. Gorton, U.S. District Judge] [Hon. Douglas P. Woodloc

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1763 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. FRANCIS CAHILL, a/k/a Bruce Cossett, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE [Hon. Lance E. Walker, U.S. District Judge]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 23-1208, 23-1211 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. JAIRO HUERTAS-MERCADO; ERICK PIZARRO-MERCADO, Defendants, Appellants. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1956 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ALLAN GIOVANNY CORDERO-VELÁZQUEZ, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. Francisco A. Besosa, U.S. District Judge]

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 17, 2012 Session ALVERAZ RAMIREZ RIGOBERTO AKA RIGOBERTO A. RAMIREZ v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Williamson County No. CR075801 Timothy L. Easter, Judge No. M2011-02690-CCA-R3-PC - Filed December 10, 2012 The Petitioner, Alveraz Ramirez Rigoberto, appeals

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 08a0096p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - FRANCISCO RAMIREZ-CANALES (05-4504)

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 18-1687 19-1750 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. NOE SALVADOR PÉREZ-VÁSQUEZ, a/k/a Crazy, Defendant, Appellant. Nos. 19-1027 19-1745 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v

357 F.Supp.2d 416 (2005) Reinaldo RAMÍREZ, et al., Plaintiffs v. Edgardo ARLEQUÍN, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 03-2376(SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. February 23, 2005. *418 Pedro R. Vazquez, III, Pedro R. Vazquez Law Office, Guaynabo, PR, for Plaintiffs. Gina Ismalia Gutierrez-Galang, Johanna M. Emm